Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis under Fairness Constraints

  • Conference paper
Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5799))

Abstract

It is well-known that fairness assumptions can be crucial for verifying progress, reactivity or other liveness properties for interleaving models. This also applies to Markov decision processes as an operational model for concurrent probabilistic systems and the task to establish tight lower or upper probability bounds for events that are specified by liveness properties. In this paper, we study general notions of strong and weak fairness constraints for Markov decision processes, formalized in an action- or state-based setting. We present a polynomially time-bounded algorithm for the quantitative analysis of an MDP against ω-automata specifications under fair worst- or best-case scenarios. Furthermore, we discuss the treatment of strong and weak fairness and process fairness constraints in the context of partial order reduction techniques for Markov decision processes that have been realized in the model checker LiQuor and rely on a variant of Peled’s ample set method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A.: Reactive modules. Formal Methods in System Design: An International Journal 15(1), 7–48 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Arons, T., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.: Parameterized verification by probabilistic abstraction. In: Gordon, A.D. (ed.) FOSSACS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2620, pp. 87–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baier, C., Ciesinski, F., Größer, M.: Probmela: a modeling language for communicating probabilistic systems. In: Proc. MEMOCODE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baier, C., Ciesinski, F., Grösser, M., Klein, J.: Reduction techniques for model checking markov decision processes. In: Proc.QEST 2008. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baier, C., D’Argenio, P., Größer, M.: Partial order reduction for probabilistic branching time. In: Proc. QAPL. ENTCS, vol. 153(2) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baier, C., Größer, M., Ciesinski, F.: Partial order reduction for probabilistic systems. In: Proc. QEST 2004. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baier, C., Katoen, J.-P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Baier, C., Kwiatkoswka, M.: Model checking for a probabilistic branching time logic with fairness. Distributed Computing 11(3) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bianco, A., de Alfaro, L.: Model checking of probabilistic and nondeterministic systems. In: Thiagarajan, P.S. (ed.) FSTTCS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1026. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chrobak, M., Gasieniec, L., Rytter, W.: A randomized algorithm for gossiping in radio networks. In: Wang, J. (ed.) COCOON 2001. LNCS, vol. 2108, p. 483. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ciesinski, F., Baier, C.: LiQuor: a tool for qualitative and quantitative linear time analysis of reactive systems. In: Proc. QEST 2007. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, E., Emerson, E., Sistla, A.: Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM TOPLAS 8(2) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Courcoubetis, C., Yannakakis, M.: The complexity of probabilistic verification. Journal of the ACM 42(4) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D’Argenio, P.R., Niebert, P.: Partial order reduction on concurrent probabilistic programs. In: Proc. QEST 2004. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Alfaro, L.: Formal Verification of Probabilistic Systems. PhD thesis (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Alfaro, L.: Stochastic transition systems. In: Sangiorgi, D., de Simone, R. (eds.) CONCUR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1466, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. de Alfaro, L.: From fairness to chance. In: Proc. PROBMIV. ENTCS, vol. 22 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dijkstra, E.W.: Guarded commands, non-determinacy and the formal derivation of programs. Comm. ACM 18 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allen Emerson, E., Lei, C.-L.: Modalities for model checking: branching time logic strikes back. Sci. Comput. Program 8(3) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Francez, N.: Fairness. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Grädel, E., Thomas, W., Wilke, T. (eds.): Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games. LNCS, vol. 2500. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Größer, M.: Reduction Methods for Probabilistic Model Checking. PhD thesis (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hart, S., Sharir, M., Pnueli, A.: Termination of probabilistic concurrent programs. ACM TOPLAS 5(3) (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holzmann, G., Peled, D.: An improvement in formal verification. In: Proc. FORTE. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holzmann, G.: The model checker SPIN. Software Engineering 23(5) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klein, J., Baier, C.: On-the-fly stuttering in the construction of deterministic omega-automata. In: Holub, J., Žďárek, J. (eds.) CIAA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4783, pp. 51–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwiatkowska, M.: Survey of fairness notions. Inf. and Softw.Techn. 31(7) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., Parker, D.: PRISM: Probabilistic symbolic model checker. In: Field, T., Harrison, P.G., Bradley, J., Harder, U. (eds.) TOOLS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2324, p. 200. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lamport, L.: Specifying concurrent program modules. TOPLAS 5(2) (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lehmann, D., Pnueli, A., Stavi, J.: Impartiality, justice and fairness: the ethics of concurrent termination. In: Even, S., Kariv, O. (eds.) ICALP 1981. LNCS, vol. 115, Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lehmann, D., Rabin, M.O.: On the advantage of free choice: A symmetric and fully distributed solution to the Dining Philosophers problem (extended abstract). In: Proc. POPL (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peled, D.: All from one, one for all: On model checking using representatives. In: Courcoubetis, C. (ed.) CAV 1993. LNCS, vol. 697. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peled, D.: Partial order reduction: Linear and branching time logics and process algebras. In: Partial Order Methods in Verification, DIMACS, vol. 29(10) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.: Probabilistic verification. Information and Computation 103(1) (March 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Puterman, M.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosier, L.E., Yen, H.C.: On the complexity of deciding fair termination of probabilistic concurrent finite-state programs. Theoretical Computer Science (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schrijver, A.: Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Vardi, M.: Automatic verification of probabilistic concurrent finite-state programs. In: Proc. FOCS (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baier, C., Groesser, M., Ciesinski, F. (2009). Quantitative Analysis under Fairness Constraints. In: Liu, Z., Ravn, A.P. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5799. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04761-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04761-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04760-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04761-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics