Skip to main content

Weaving Variability into Domain Metamodels

  • Conference paper
Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2009)

Abstract

Domain-Specific Modeling Languages (DSMLs) describe the concepts of a particular domain and their relationships, in a metamodel. From a given DSML, it is possible to describe a wide range of different models. These models often share a common base and vary on some parts. Current approaches tend to distinguish the variability language from the DSMLs themselves, implying greater learning curve for DSMLs stakeholders and a significant overhead in product line engineering of DSMLs. We propose to consider variability as an independent aspect to be woven into the DSML to introduce variability capabilities. In particular we detail how variability is woven and how to perform product line derivation. We validate our approach through the weaving of variability into two very different metamodels: Ecore and SmartAdapter, our Aspect-Oriented modeling weaver, thus adding flexibility in the weaving process itself. These results emphasize how new abilities of the language can be provided by this means.

This work was realized in the context of the MOVIDA and the FAROS projects, funded by the ANR (French National Research Agency).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Secaucus (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Perrouin, G., Klein, J., Guelfi, N., Jézéquel, J.M.: Reconciling automation and flexibility in product derivation. In: 12th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2008), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 339–348. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language OMG UML, Superstructure Version 2.2. Technical Report formal/2007-02-03, Object Management Group (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lahire, P., Morin, B., Vanwormhoudt, G., Gaignard, A., Barais, O., Jézéquel, J.M.: Introducing variability into aspect-oriented modeling approaches. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 498–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray, J., Sztipanovits, J., Schmidt, D.C., Bapty, T., Neema, S., Gokhale, A.: Two-level aspect weaving to support evolution in model-driven synthesis, pp. 681–709. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schobbens, P.-Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.-C., Bontemps, Y.: Feature Diagrams: A Survey and A Formal Semantics. In: RE, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C., Bontemps, Y.: Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Computer Networks 51, 456–479 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Formalizing Cardinality-based Feature Models and their Specialization. Software Process Improvement and Practice 10, 7–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Griss, M.L., Favaro, J., d’ Alessandro, M.: Integrating Feature Modeling with the RSEB. In: ICSR, Washington, DC, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., Huh, M.: FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain-Specific Reference Architectures. Ann. Softw. Eng. 5, 143–168 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haugen, O., Moller-Pedersen, B., Oldevik, J., Olsen, G.K., Svendsen, A.: Adding standardized variability to domain specific languages. In: Software Product Line Conference, pp. 139–148 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramos, R., Barais, O., Jézéquel, J.M.: Matching model-snippets. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Batory, D.S.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. PureSystems. Pure:: Variants Website (2006), http://www.pure-systems.com/

  16. Czarnecki, K., Antkiewicz, M.: Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach based on Superimposed Variants. In: Glück, R., Lowry, M. (eds.) GPCE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3676, pp. 422–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Benavides, D., Segura, S., Trinidad, P., Ruiz-Cortes, A.: FAMA: Tooling a framework for the automated analysis of feature models. In: Proceeding of the First International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VAMOS), pp. 129–134 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Metzger, A., Pohl, K., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.-Y., Saval, G.: Disambiguating the documentation of variability in software product lines: A separation of concerns, formalization and automated analysis. In: IEEE Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 243–253. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Muller, P.-A., Fleurey, F., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Weaving executability into object-oriented meta-languages. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 264–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziadi, T., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Product Line Engineering with the UML: Deriving Products. In: Families Research Book. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Voelter, M., Groher, I.: Product line implementation using aspect-oriented and model-driven software development. In: 11th International Software Product Line Conference, Kyoto, Japan, p. 10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morin, B., Perrouin, G., Lahire, P., Barais, O., Vanwormhoudt, G., Jézéquel, JM. (2009). Weaving Variability into Domain Metamodels. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5795. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04424-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04425-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics