Abstract
The design of complex inter-enterprise business processes (IEBP) is generally performed in a modular way. Each process is designed separately from the others and then the whole IEBP is obtained by composition. Even if such a modular approach is intuitive and facilitates the design problem, it poses the problem that correct behavior of each business process of the IEBP taken alone does not guarantee a correct behavior of the composed IEBP (i.e. properties are not preserved by composition). Proving correctness of the (unknown) composed process is strongly related to the model checking problem of a system model. Among others, the symbolic observation graph based approach has proven to be very helpful for efficient model checking in general. Since it is heavily based on abstraction techniques and thus hides detailed information about system components that are not relevant for the correctness decision, it is promising to transfer this concept to the problem rised in this paper: How can the symbolic observation graph technique be adapted and employed for process composition? Answering this question is the aim of this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bryant, R.E.: Symbolic boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams. ACM Computing Surveys 24(3), 293–318 (1992)
Bultan, T., Su, J., Fu, X.: Analyzing conversations of web services. IEEE Internet Computing 10(1), 18–25 (2006)
Dehnert, J., Rittgen, P.: Relaxed soundness of business processes. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 157–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Grefen, P., Aberer, K., Hoffner, Y., Ludwig, H.: Crossflow: Cross-organizational workflow management in dynamic virtual enterprises. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering 15(5), 277–290 (2000)
Grigori, D., Corrales, J.C., Bouzeghoub, M.: Behavioral matchmaking for service retrieval. In: ICWS 2006: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 145–152. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)
Haddad, S., Ilié, J.-M., Klai, K.: Design and evaluation of a symbolic and abstraction-based model checker. In: Wang, F. (ed.) ATVA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3299, pp. 196–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Klai, K., Petrucci, L.: Modular construction of the symbolic observation graph. In: Billington, J., Duan, Z., Koutny, M. (eds.) ACSD, pp. 88–97. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)
Klai, K., Poitrenaud, D.: MC-SOG: An LTL model checker based on symbolic observation graphs. In: van Hee, K.M., Valk, R. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5062, pp. 288–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Lohmann, N., Massuthe, P., Stahl, C., Weinberg, D.: Analyzing interacting ws-bpel processes using flexible model generation. Data Knowl. Eng. 64(1), 38–54 (2008)
Martens, A.: On Usability of Web Services. In: Calero, C., Daz, O., Piattini, M. (eds.) Proceedings of 1st Web Services Quality Workshop (WQW 2003), Rome, Italy (2003)
Martens, A.: Analyzing web service based business processes. In: Cerioli, M. (ed.) FASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3442, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Martens, A.: Simulation and Equivalence between BPEL Process Models. In: Proceedings of the Design, Analysis, and Simulation of Distributed Systems Symposium (DASD 2005), Part of the 2005 Spring Simulation Multiconference (SpringSim 2005), San Diego, California (April 2005)
Martens, A., Simon, M., Achim, G., Karoline, F.: Analyzing compatibility of bpel processes. In: AICT-ICIW 2006: Proceedings of the Advanced Int’l Conference on Telecommunications and Int’l Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, Washington, DC, USA, p. 147. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)
Massuthe, P., Wolf, K.: An Algorithm for Matching Nondeterministic Services with Operating Guidelines. Informatik-Berichte 202, Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin (2006)
Pankratius, V., Stucky, W.: A formal foundation for workflow composition, workflow view definition, and workflow normalization based on Petri nets. In: APCCM 2005: Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific conference on Conceptual modelling, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, pp. 79–88. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2005)
Read, R., Corneil, D.: The Graph Isomorphism Disease. Graph Theory 1, 339–363 (1977)
Siegeris, J., Zimmermann, A.: Workflow model compositions preserving relaxed soundness. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 177–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M.: The P2P approach to interorganizational workflows. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 140–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
van Dijk, A.: Contracting workflows and protocol patterns. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 152–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Klai, K., Tata, S., Desel, J. (2009). Symbolic Abstraction and Deadlock-Freeness Verification of Inter-enterprise Processes. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5701. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03847-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03848-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)