Skip to main content

Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2009)

Abstract

In this paper we explore findings from three experiments that use minimally invasive sensors with a web based geometry tutor to create a user model. Minimally invasive sensor technology is mature enough to equip classrooms of up to 25 students with four sensors at the same time while using a computer based intelligent tutoring system. The sensors, which are on each student’s chair, mouse, monitor, and wrist, provide data about posture, movement, grip tension, arousal, and facially expressed mental states. This data may provide adaptive feedback to an intelligent tutoring system based on an individual student’s affective states. The experiments show that when sensor data supplements a user model based on tutor logs, the model reflects a larger percentage of the students’ self-concept than a user model based on the tutor logs alone. The models are further expanded to classify four ranges of emotional self-concept including frustration, interest, confidence, and excitement with over 78% accuracy. The emotional predictions are a first step for intelligent tutor systems to create sensor based personalized feedback for each student in a classroom environment. Bringing sensors to our children’s schools addresses real problems of students’ relationship to mathematics as they are learning the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8(1), 30–43 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shute, V.J., Psotka, J.: Intelligent tutoring systems past, present and future. In: Jonassen, D. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Scholastic Publications (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N.: Digital chameleons. Psychological Science 16(10), 814–819 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Florea, A., Kalisz, E.: Embedding emotions in an artificial tutor. In: SYNASC 2005 (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arroyo, I., Beal, C., Murray, T., Walles, R., Woolf, B.P.: Web-based intelligent multimedia tutoring for high stakes achievement tests. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 468–477. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, J., Wang, X.: Multimodal affective user interface using wireless devices for emotion identification, pp. 7155–7157 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McQuiggan, S., Lee, S., Lester, J.: Early prediction of student frustration. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 698–709 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McQuiggan, S., Mott, B., Lester, J.: Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(1), 81–123 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Royer, J.M., Walles, R.: Influences of gender, motivation and socioeconomic status on mathematics performance. In: Berch, D.B., Mazzocco, M.M.M. (eds.) Why is Math so Hard for Some Children, pp. 349–368. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Catsambis, S.: The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education 67(3), 199–215 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tobias, S.: Overcoming Math Anxiety, Revised and Expanded. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strauss, M., Reynolds, C., Hughes, S., Park, K., McDarby, G., Picard, R.: The handwave bluetooth skin conductance sensor. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 699–706 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Qi, Y., Picard, R.: Context-sensitive bayesian classifiers and application to mouse pressure pattern classification. In: Proceedings. 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 448–451 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kapoor, A., Burleson, W., Picard, R.W.: Automatic prediction of frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(8), 724–736 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burleson, W., Picard, R.W.: Gender-specific approaches to developing emotionally intelligent learning companions. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(4), 62–69 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. el Kaliouby, R.: Mind-reading Machines: the automated inference of complex mental states from video. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. D’Mello, S., Picard, R.W., Graesser, A.: Toward an affect-sensitive autotutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(4), 53–61 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cooper, D.G., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Christopherson, R. (2009). Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom. In: Houben, GJ., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5535. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02246-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02247-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics