Skip to main content

Abstract

Many real-world problems require the enumeration of all solutions of combinatorial search problems, even though this is often infeasible in practice. However, not always all parts of a solution are needed. We are thus interested in projecting solutions to a restricted vocabulary. Yet, the adaption of Boolean constraint solving algorithms turns out to be non-obvious provided one wants a repetition-free enumeration in polynomial space. We address this problem and propose a new algorithm computing projective solutions. Although we have implemented our approach in the context of Answer Set Programming, it is readily applicable to any solver based on modern Boolean constraint technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.: GRASP: A search algorithm for propositional satisfiability. IEEE Transactions on Computers 48(5), 506–521 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Moskewicz, M., Madigan, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver. In: Proc. DAC 2001, pp. 530–535. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, D.: A SAT solver primer. Bulletin of the EATCS 85, 112–133 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Neumann, A., Schaub, T.: Conflict-driven answer set solving. In: Proc. IJCAI 2007, pp. 386–392. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davies, J., Bacchus, F.: Using more reasoning to improve #SAT solving. In: Proc. AAAI 2007, pp. 185–190. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Dechter, R.: Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, M., Putnam, H.: A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM 7, 201–215 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem-proving. Communications of the ACM 5, 394–397 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Giunchiglia, E., Maratea, M.: Solving optimization problems with DLL. In: Proc. ECAI 2006, pp. 377–381. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Neumann, A., Schaub, T.: Conflict-driven answer set enumeration. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4483, pp. 136–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, L., Madigan, C., Moskewicz, M., Malik, S.: Efficient conflict driven learning in a Boolean satisfiability solver. In: Proc. ICCAD 2001, pp. 279–285. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan, L.: Efficient algorithms for clause-learning SAT solvers. MSc’s thesis, SFU (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Järvisalo, M., Junttila, T.: Limitations of restricted branching in clause learning. Constraints (to appear), http://www.tcs.hut.fi/textasciitildemjj/

  15. Pipatsrisawat, K., Darwiche, A.: A lightweight component caching scheme for satisability solvers. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 294–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gebser, M., Schaub, T., Thiele, S., Usadel, B., Veber, P.: Detecting inconsistencies in large biological networks with answer set programming. In: Garcia De La Banda, M., Pontelli, E. (eds.) ICLP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5366, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T. (2009). Solution Enumeration for Projected Boolean Search Problems. In: van Hoeve, WJ., Hooker, J.N. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. CPAIOR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5547. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01929-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01929-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01928-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01929-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics