Skip to main content

Concepts and Applications of AquaCrop: The FAO Crop Water Productivity Model

  • Conference paper
Crop Modeling and Decision Support

Abstract

Predicting attainable yield under water-limiting conditions is an important goal in arid, semi-arid and drought-prone environments. To address this task, FAO has developed a model, AquaCrop, which simulates attainable yields of the major herbaceous crops in response to water. Compared to other models, AquaCrop has a significantly smaller number of parameters and attempts to strike a balance between simplicity, accuracy, and robustness. Root zone water content is simulated by keeping track of incoming and outgoing water fluxes. Instead of leaf area index, AquaCrop uses canopy ground cover. Canopy expansion, stomatal conductance, canopy senescence, and harvest index are the key physiological processes which respond to water stress. Low and high temperature stresses on pollination and harvestable yield are considered, as is cold temperature stress on biomass production. Evapotranspiration is simulated separately as crop transpiration and soil evaporation and the daily transpiration is used to calculate the biomass gain via the normalized biomass water productivity. The normalization is for atmospheric evaporative demand and carbon dioxide concentration, to make the model applicable to diverse locations and seasons, including future climate scenarios. AquaCrop accommodates fertility levels and water management systems, including rainfed, supplemental, deficit, and full irrigation. Simulations are routinely in thermal time, but can be carried out in calendar time. Future versions will incorporate salt balance and capillary raise. AquaCrop is aimed at users in extension services, consulting firms, governmental agencies, NGOs, farmers associations and irrigation districts, as well as economists and policy analysts in need of crop models for planning and assessing water needs and use of projects and regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper n. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir J and Sinclair TR (1991) A Model of Water Limitation on Spring Wheat Growth and Yield. Field Crop Res 28:59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S and Hsiao TC (2000) Canopy CO2 assimilation, energy balance, and water use efficiency of an alfalfa crop before and after cutting. Field Crop Res 67:191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam-Ali SN and Squire GR (2002) Principles of Tropical Agronomy, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DN, Lambert JR, McKinion JM (1983). GOSSYM: A simulator of cotton crop growth and yield. South Carolina Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmans C, Wesseling JG, Feddes RA (1983) Simulation of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE. J Hydrol 63:271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavero JI, Farre I, Debaeke P, Faci JM (2000) Simulation of maize yield under water stress with the EPICphase and CROPWAT models. Agron J 92:679–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J and Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper n. 33. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahani HJ, Izzi G, Oweis TY (2008). Parameterization and evaluation of AquaCrop for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Vila M, Fereres E, Mateos L, Orgaz F, Steduto P (2008) Deficit Irrigation Optimization of Cotton with AquaCrop. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M, Del Castillo C, Buytaert W (2006) Agro-climatic suitability mapping for crop production in the Bolivian Altiplano: A case study for quinoa. Agric Forest Meteorol 139:399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M, Miranda R, Cusicanqui JA, Taboada C, Mendoza J, Huanca R, Mamani A, Condori O, Mamani J, Morales B, Osco V, Steduto P (2008) Simulating Yield Response to Water of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) with FAO-AquaCrop. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gommes RA (1983). Pocket computers in agrometeorology. Plant production and Protection Paper n. 45. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR (2002) Future contributions of crop modeling:/from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. Eur J Agron 18:15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng LK, Hsiao TC, Steduto P, Evett SR, Howell TA, Raes D, Fereres E (2008) Validating the FAO AquaCrop Model on Irrigated and Water Deficient Field Maize. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC (1993) Effects of drought and elevated CO2 on plant water use efficiency and productivity. In: Jackson MD Black CR (eds) Global environmental change. Interacting stresses on plants in a changing climate. NATO ASI series. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC, Heng LK, Steduto P, Raes D, Fereres E (2008) AquaCrop — Model Parameterization and Testing for Maize. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CA and Kiniry JR (ed.) (1986) CERES-Maize: A simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM; a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster GS and Wilhelm WW (1997) Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric Forest Meteorol 87:291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penning de Vries FWT, van Laar HH, Chardon MCM (1983) Bioenergetics of growth of seeds, fruits and storage organs. In: Smith WH and Banta SJ (eds): Productivity of Field Crops Under Different Environments. IRRI, Los Baños, The Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip JR (1957) Evaporation, and moisture and heat fields in the soil. J Meteorol 14:354–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes D, Geerts S, Kipkorir E, Wellens J, Sahli A (2006) Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model. Agr Water Manage 81:335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Heng L (2008a) AquaCrop Calculation Procedures, Prototype Version 2.4. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2008b) AquaCrop — The FAO crop model for predicting yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research 8, 1204–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1983). Efficient water use in crop production: Discussion on the generality of relations between biomass production and evapotranspiration. In: HM Taylor et al. (ed.) Limitations to efficient water use in production. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCS (1993). ‘Irrigation water requirements’ National Engineering Handbook, part 623. Soil Conservation Service, US Dept. of Agriculture. Washington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P (2003). Biomass Water-Productivity. Comparing the Growth-Engines of Crop Models. FAO Expert Consultation on Crop Water Productivity Under Deficient Water Supply, 26–28 February 2003, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P and Albrizio R (2005). Resource use efficiency of field-grown sunflower, sorghum, wheat and chickpea. II. Water Use Efficiency and comparison with Radiation Use Efficiency. Agric Forest Meteorol 130:269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2007) On the conservative behaviour of biomass water productivity. Irrigation Science 25, 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Raes D, Fereres E (2008) AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Predict Yield Response to Water: I Concepts. Agron J special issue (under publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JI, Hagan RM, Pruitt WO (1974) Functions to predict optimal irrigation programs. J. Irr. Drain. Div. ASCE 100:179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CB and Sinclair TR (1983) Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Eds Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ittersum MK, Leffelaar PA, van Keulen H, Kropff MJ, Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J (2003) On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. Eur J Agron 18:201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang E, Robertson MJ, Hammer GL, Carberry PS, Holzworth D, Meinke H, Chapman SC, Hargreaves JNG, Huth NI, McLean G (2002) Development of a generic crop model template in the cropping system model APSIM. Eur J Agron 18:121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisler FD, Acock B, Baker DN, Fye RE, Hodges HF, Lambert JR, Lemmon HE, Mckinion JM, Reddy VR (1986) Crop simulation models in agronomic systems. Adv Agron 40:141–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler TR, Hong TD, Ellis RH, Batts GR, Morison JIL, Hadley P (1996) The duration and rate of grain growth, and harvest index, of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to temperature and CO2. J Exp Bot 47:623–630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu LK and Hsiao TC (2004) Predicted vs. measured photosynthetic water use efficiency of crops stands under dynamically changing field environments. J Exp Bot 55:2395–2411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X and Van Laar HH (2005) Crop Systems Dynamics: An Ecophysiological Simulation Model for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Steduto, P. et al. (2009). Concepts and Applications of AquaCrop: The FAO Crop Water Productivity Model. In: Cao, W., White, J.W., Wang, E. (eds) Crop Modeling and Decision Support. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01132-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics