Skip to main content

Principal Component Analysis of Lifting Kinematics and Kinetics in Pregnant Subjects

  • Conference paper
13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 23))

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is estimated to affect 50–90% of women during pregnancy with more than a third of women reporting it as a severe problem compromising their ability to work during pregnancy and affecting normal daily life and sleep patterns. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in kinematics and kinetics of lifting in pregnant subjects.

Methodology

Fifteen maternal subjects (age: 32.0±2.3 yrs; height: 165.3±5.5cm; weight: 71.7±6.4kg) were tested at the third trimester of pregnancy (32-38 weeks). Twenty-seven retro reflective markers were placed on the various bony landmarks of the subjects. An eight-camera motion analysis system (VICON 512, VICON, Oxford, UK) was used to record movements of the body segment and synchronised force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) parameters in three dimensions. Eight non-pregnant subjects (age: 29.6±3.1yrs; height:167.3±5.6cm; weight:65.4±8.4kg) were used as controls.

Each subject lifted a 4 kg plastic box (dimension: 31.5x25x20 cm), which is representative of commonly lifted items. Motion of the ankle, knee and hip joints and pelvic segments were investigated. Principal component (PC) analysis was applied to 23 kinematic and kinetic variables from each group. The total PC score for each subject was calculated, and a one-tail student-t test was used to test for significant differences between the groups.

Results

Significant group differences (p<0.05) were found for three of the PC scores. Parameters found to be major contributors to these differences included minimum hip flexion extension moment; maximum knee flexion moment; maximum ankle plantar flexion and knee flexion angles and average hip flexion extension angles.

Discussion

PCA was able to identify different lifting kinematics and kinetics in pregnant subjects and important biomechanical differences when compared with the control group. This is the first study to identify such lifting differences during pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. MacEvilly M and B. D, Back pain and pregnancy: a review. Pain, 1996. 64: p. 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chau, T., A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 1: fuzzy, statistical and fractal methods. Gait & Posture, 2001. 13(1): p. 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joliffe, I., Principal component analysis. 1986, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Olney, S., M. Griffin, and I. McBride, Multivariate Examination of Data from Gait Analysis of Persons with Stroke. Physical Therapy, 1998. 78(8): p. 814–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto, S., et al., Quantitative gait evaluation of hip diseases using principal component analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 1983. 16(9): p. 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadeghi, H., et al., Principal component analysis of the power developed in the flexion/extension muscles of the hip in able-bodied gait. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2000. 22(10): p. 703–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wrigley, A.T., et al., Differentiating lifting technique between those who develop low back pain and those who do not. Clinical Biomechanics., 2005. 20(3): p. 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wrigley, A.T., et al., Principal component analysis of lifting waveforms. Clinical Biomechanics., 2006. 21(6): p. 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalaf, K.A., et al., Feature extraction and quantification of the variability of dynamic performance profiles due to the different sagittal lift characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering., 1999. 7(3): p. 278–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daffertshofer, A., et al., PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clinical Biomechanics, 2004. 19(4): p. 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinnerton, S., et al. Weight gain and lifting during pregnancy. in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society. 1993. Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nicholls, J. and D. Grieve, Performance of physical tasks in pregnancy. Ergonomics, 1992. 35: p. 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cherry, N., Physical demands of work and health complaints among women working late in pregnancy. Ergonomics, 1987. 30: p. 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen, T.C., Reynolds, K.J. (2009). Principal Component Analysis of Lifting Kinematics and Kinetics in Pregnant Subjects. In: Lim, C.T., Goh, J.C.H. (eds) 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_468

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_468

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92840-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92841-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics