Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation and Management of the Habitats of Two Relict Butterflies in the Belgian Ardenne: Proclossiana eunomia and Lycaena helle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Relict Species

Abstract

Habitat preservation and restoration are crucial for species conservation and to tackle its main challenges. In many cases, this implies management actions, especially for semi-natural ecosystems. We address here the question of management actions suitable for maintaining viable populations of two relict butterfly species inhabiting wet meadows and peat bogs in the Belgian Ardenne: the bog fritillary Proclossiana eunomia and the violet copper Lycaena helle. Habitat loss due to natural vegetation succession towards forest can be prevented either by mowing (traditional way of management) or by extensive grazing (with cattle or horses).

Results from field studies and experiments conducted on several sites in the Belgian Ardenne led to two conclusions. Mowing can strongly affect the populations of both species, the impact being particularly pronounced on larval stages due to the removal of grass tussocks and the export of hay containing host plant on which caterpillars feed. Grazing also has a negative effect on both species, with adult density being lower on grazed biotopes compared to abandoned ones. However, the negative impact is more limited for grazing than for mowing.

As both management methods have more or less pronounced negative impacts on populations of these two butterfly species, they should be applied with caution. We suggest that mowing should be applied in long-term rotation, with the preservation of sufficient refuge areas every year, and that grazing should be applied in late summer, every other year, with a low stocking rate (< 0.2 LU/ha/year). More particularly, to ensure their effectiveness in maintaining a favorable state, both the biotope and the associated populations using it as their habitat, management actions must be designed according to the species habitat requirements, and adapted to carefully monitor their implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ausden M, Treweek J (1995) Grasslands. In: Sutherland WJ, Hill DA (eds) Managing habitats for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker JP, Londo G (1998) Grazing for conservation management in historical perspective. In: WallisDeVries MF (ed) Grazing and conservation management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 23–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer O, Erhardt A (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for central european butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conserv Biol 14(3):746–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barascud B, Descimon H (1992) Deux papillons “reliques glaciaires” en France: Lycaena helle (Lycaenidae) et Proclossiana eunomia (Nymphalidae): biogéographie, génétique et conservation. Insectes 87(4):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin J (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv Biol 18(6):1482–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourn NAD, Thomas JA (2002) The challenge of conserving grassland insects at the margins of their range in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock JM, Pakeman RJ (1997) Grazing of lowland heath in England: management methods and their effects on heathland vegetation. Biol Conserv 79:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Delescaille L-M (2002) Nature conservation and pastoralism in Wallonia. In: Redecker R (ed) Pasture landscapes and nature conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Descimon H, Zimmermann M, Cosson E, Barascud B, Nève G (2001) Diversité génétique, variation géographique et flux géniques chez quelques lépidoptères rhopalocères français. Genet Sel Evol 33(suppl. 1):S223-S249

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Geyer A (1997) Influence of management on butterflies of rare grassland ecosystems in Germany. J Insect Conserv 1:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen H, Beinlich B, Plachter H (1997) Effects of large-scale cattle grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerion and Lasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). J Insect Conserv 1:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis S (2003) Habitat quality and management for the Northern brown argus butterfly Aricia artaxerxes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in North East England. Biol Conserv 113:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera : sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt A, Thomas JA (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland in Europe. In: Collins NM, Thomas J (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic, London, pp 213–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Feber RE, Smith H (1995) Butterfly conservation on arable farmland. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 84–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Feber RE, Smith H, Macdonald DW (1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J Appl Ecol 33:1191–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichefet V, Barbier Y, Baugnée J-Y, Dufrêne M, Goffart P, Maes D, Van Dyck H (2008) papillons de jour de Wallonie (1985-2007). Publication du Groupe de Travail Papillons de jour Lycaena et du Centre de Recherche de la Nature, des Forêts et du Bois (MRW-DGRNE), Gembloux

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger A, Schmitt Th, Zachos Fr E, Meyer M, Assmann Th, Habel Jc (2009) The genetic status of the violet copper Lycaena Lelle-a relict of the cold past in times of global warming. Ecography 32:382–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K, Burkhard B, Plachter H (1999) Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the Violet Copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv 3(1):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffart Ph, Waeyenbergh M (1994) Exigences écologiques et gestion des populations de deux papillons des prairies humides ardennaises: le Cuivré et le Nacré de la Bistorte (Lycaena helle, Proclossiana eunomia). Cahiers des Réserves Naturelles RNOB 7:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffart Ph, Baguette M, De Bast B (1992) La situation des Lépidoptères Rhopalocères en Wallonie ou Que sont nos papillons devenus? Bulletin and Annales de la Société royale belge d’Entomologie 128:355–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffart Ph, Baguette M, Dufrêne M, Mousson L Nève G, Sawchik J, Weiserbs A, Lebrun P (2001) Gestion des milieux semi-naturels et restauration de populations menacées de papillons de jour. Travaux n°25, Publication de la Région wallonne, Division de la Nature et des Forêts, Jambes

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1997) Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. TREE 19(2):101–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Dreshsler M, Thomas J, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy J, Pullin AS (1997) The effects of flooding on the survival and behaviour of overwintering large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia larvae. Biol Conserv 82:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Maradova M, Benes J, Fric Z, Kepka P (2003) Uphill shifts in distribution of butterflies in the Czech Republic: effects of changing climate detected on a regional scale. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12(5):403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Wilson JD, Bradbury RB, Siriwardena GM (1999) The second silent spring? Nature 400:611–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity. Biol Conserv 106:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna O (2002) The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Oedippus 20:1–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert J (1963) Recherches phytosociologiques sur les prairies de la moyenne Ardenne. Agricultura 1:1-198 vol. XI, 2ème série

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (North Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (1980) Une sous-espèce méconnue de Lycaena helle D. and Schiff., 1775 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Linneana Belg Pars VIII(3):130–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (1981a) Révision systématique, chorologique et écologique de Lycaena helle D. and Schiff., 1775 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) ; 1ère partie: la systématique. Linneana Belg Pars VIII(6):238–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (1981b) Révision systématique, chorologique et écologique de Lycaena helle D. and Schiff., 1775 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae), 2ème partie: la chorologie. Linneana Belg Pars VIII(8):345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MG (2000) The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands. Biol Conserv 95:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munguira ML, Thomas JA (1992) Use of road verges by butterfly and burnet populations, and the effect of roads on adult dispersal and mortality. J Appl Ecol 29:316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nève G, Barascud B, Descimon H, Baguette M (2000) Genetic structure of Proclossiana eunomia populations at the regional scale (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Heredity 84:657–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oates MR (1995) Butterfly conservation within the management of grassland habitats. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 98–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Eriksson AK, Smith HG (2006) Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. Biol Conserv 133:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Descimon H, Huntley B, Kaila L, Kullberg J, Tammaru T, Tennent WJ, Thomas JA, Warren M (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:579–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyri J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2004) Restoration of butterfly and moth communities to in semi-natural grasslands by cattle grazing. Ecol Appl 14(6):1656–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyri J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2005) Responses of butterfly and moth species to restored cattle grazing in semi-natural grasslands. Biol Conserv 122:465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyri J, Luoto M, Paukkunen J, Pykälä J, Raatikainen K, Kuussaari M (2006) Different responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient of vegetation height : an indicator of the vertebrate grazing intensity and successional age. Oikos 115:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards SA (2005) Testing ecological theory using the information-theoretic approach: examples and cautionary results. Ecology 86(10):2805–2814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2009) (Meta)population viability analysis: a crystal ball for the conservation of endangered butterflies. In: Settele J, Konvicka M, Shreeve T, Van Dyck H (eds), Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, chapter 22, pp. 339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Turlure C, Baguette M (2007) Grazing management impacts on the viability of the threatened bog fritillary butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Biol Conserv 136(4):651–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwälder B et al (1997) Habitat utilization by the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia ssp. celadussa (Rott.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in montane grasslands of different management. Biol Conserv 82:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severns P, Boldt L, Villegas S (2006) Conserving a wetland butterfly: quantifying early lifestage survival through seasonal flooding, adult nectar, and habitat preference. J Insect Conserv 10(4):361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. TREE 17(10):474–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanescu C, Penuelas J, Filella I (2005) Butterflies highlight the conservation value of hay meadows highly threatened by land-use changes in a protected Mediterranean area. Biol Conserv 126:234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W (2002) Openness in management. Nature 418:834–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svenning J-C (2002) A review of natural vegetation openness in North-Western Europe. Biol Conserv 104:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swengel AB (1996) Effects of fire and hay managements on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 76:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swengel AB (1998) Effects management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens. Biol Conserv 83(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A, Swengel S (2007) Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites. J Insect Conserv 11(3):263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The Scientific management of temperate communities for conservation, 31st symposium of the British ecological society, Southampton, 1989. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 149–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlure C, Van Dyck H, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2009) Resource-based habitat definition, niche overlap and conservation of two sympatric glacial relict butterflies. Oikos 118:950–960

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay C, Warren M (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and environment, n 99. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay C, Warren M, Loïs G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10(2):189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wieren SE (1991) The management of populations of large mammals. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The Scientific management of temperate communities for conservation, 31st symposium of the British ecological society, Southampton, 1989. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wieren SE (1995) The potential role of large herbivores in nature conservation and extensive land use in Europe. Biol J Linn Soc 56(suppl.):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JA, Debinski DM, Koford RR, Miller JR (2007) Butterfly responses to prairie restoration through fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 140(1-2):78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, Raemakers I (2001) Does extensive grazing benefit butterflies in coastal dunes? Restor Ecol 9(2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, Bakker JP, Van Wieren SE (eds) (1998) Grazing and conservation management. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss SB (1999) Cars, cows, and checkerspot butterflies: nitrogen deposition and management of nutrient-poor grasslands for a threatened species. Conserv Biol 13(6):1476–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein W, Schmid B (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on buterflies and grasshoppers. J Appl Ecol 36:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White P, Kerr JT (2006) Contrasting spatial and temporal global change impacts on butterfly species richness during the 20th century. Ecography 29(6):908–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Michel Waeyenbergh, Anne Weiserbs, Gabriel Nève, Isabelle Convié, Isabelle Brasseur, Catherine Burnotte, Julie Choutt, Michel Baguette, Philippe Fayt, and Michel Pirnay who helped during field work. We are very grateful to Philippe Lebrun, Michel Baguette, Hans Van Dyck, Marc Dufrêne, and Pierre Gérard, who provided support at different stages of the work and Thomas Schmitt who commented on an earlier version of the manuscript. Camille Turlure acknowledges a PhD grant from the FRIA institution. Nicolas Schtickzelle is research associate of the Fund for Scientific Research-FNRS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département de 1’Étude du Milieu naturel et agricde (DEMna), Service Public Wallon (SPW), 23, Avenue Maréchal Juin, B-5030, Gembloux, Belgium

    Philippe Goffart

  2. Biodiversity Research Centre, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Nicolas Schtickzelle & Camille Turlure

Authors
  1. Philippe Goffart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Schtickzelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Camille Turlure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Goffart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Musée National d´Histoire Naturelle Luxembourg, 25, rue Münster, 2160, Luxembourg

    Jan Christian Habel

  2. Institute of Ecology and Environmental Chemistry, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany

    Thorsten Assmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goffart, P., Schtickzelle, N., Turlure, C. (2010). Conservation and Management of the Habitats of Two Relict Butterflies in the Belgian Ardenne: Proclossiana eunomia and Lycaena helle . In: Habel, J.C., Assmann, T. (eds) Relict Species. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92160-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation