Skip to main content

An Approach to Probabilistic Data Integration for the Semantic Web

  • Conference paper
Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I (URSW 2006, URSW 2007, URSW 2005)

Abstract

Probabilistic description logic programs are a powerful tool for knowledge representation in the Semantic Web, which combine description logics, normal programs under the answer set or well-founded semantics, and probabilistic uncertainty. The task of data integration amounts to providing the user with access to a set of heterogeneous data sources in the same fashion as when querying a single database, that is, through a global schema, which is a common representation of all the underlying data sources. In this paper, we make use of probabilistic description logic programs to model expressive data integration systems for the Semantic Web, where constraints are expressed both over the data sources and the global schema. We describe different types of probabilistic data integration, which aim especially at applications in the Semantic Web.

This paper is a significantly extended and revised version of a position paper that appeared in: Proceedings URSW-2006. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 218, CEUR-WS.org, 2006.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T.: Weaving the Web, Harper, San Francisco, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W3C: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/

  3. van Keulen, M., de Keijzer, A., Alink, W.: A probabilistic XML approach to data integration. In: Proceedings ICDE 2005, pp. 459–470. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pan, R., Ding, Z., Yu, Y., Peng, Y.: A Bayesian network approach to ontology mapping. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 563–577. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 17–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web. Artif. Intell. 172(12/13), 1495–1539 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Well-founded semantics for description logic programs in the Semantic Web. In: Antoniou, G., Boley, H. (eds.) RuleML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3323, pp. 81–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lukasiewicz, T.: A novel combination of answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 384–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Giugno, R., Lukasiewicz, T.: P-\(\mathcal{SHOQ}({\bf D})\): A probabilistic extension of \(\mathcal{SHOQ}({\bf D})\) for probabilistic ontologies in the Semantic Web. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Leone, N., Ianni, G. (eds.) JELIA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2424, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lukasiewicz, T.: Expressive probabilistic description logics. Artif. Intell. 172(6/7), 852–883 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. da Costa, P.C.G.: Bayesian Semantics for the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. da Costa, P.C.G., Laskey, K.B.: PR-OWL: A framework for probabilistic ontologies. In: Proceedings FOIS 2006, pp. 237–249. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Udrea, O., Deng, Y., Hung, E., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Probabilistic ontologies and relational databases. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic description logic programs. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 45(2), 288–307 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Calì, A., Lukasiewicz, T.: Tightly integrated probabilistic description logic programs for the Semantic Web. In: Dahl, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) ICLP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4670, pp. 428–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Baral, C., Gelfond, M., Rushton, J.N.: Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. In: Lifschitz, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) LPNMR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2923, pp. 21–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kersting, K., De Raedt, L.: Bayesian logic programs. CoRR cs.AI/0111058 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poole, D.: The independent choice logic for modelling multiple agents under uncertainty. Artif. Intell. 94(1–2), 7–56 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lukasiewicz, T.: Tractable probabilistic description logic programs. In: Prade, H., Subrahmanian, V.S. (eds.) SUM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4772, pp. 143–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Data complexity of query answering in description logics. In: Proceedings KR 2006, pp. 260–270. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and deductive databases. New Generation Computing 17, 365–387 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings PODS 2002, pp. 233–246. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, M., Levy, A.Y., Millstein, T.D.: Navigational plans for data integration. In: Proceedings AAAI 1999, pp. 67–73. AAAI Press/ MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Calì, A.: Reasoning in data integration systems: Why LAV and GAV are siblings. In: Zhong, N., Raś, Z.W., Tsumoto, S., Suzuki, E. (eds.) ISMIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2871, pp. 562–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Dalvi, N.N., Suciu, D.: Management of probabilistic data: Foundations and challenges. In: Proceedings PODS 2007, pp. 1–12. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Calì, A., Lukasiewicz, T. (2008). An Approach to Probabilistic Data Integration for the Semantic Web. In: da Costa, P.C.G., et al. Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I. URSW URSW URSW 2006 2007 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89764-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89765-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics