Skip to main content

An Ontology-Based Bayesian Network Approach for Representing Uncertainty in Clinical Practice Guidelines

  • Conference paper
Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I (URSW 2006, URSW 2007, URSW 2005)

Abstract

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) play an important role in improving quality of care and patient outcomes. Although several machine-readable representations of practice guidelines have been implemented with semantic web technologies, there is no implementation to represent uncertainty in activity graphs in clinical practice guidelines. In this paper, we explore a Bayesian Network(BN) approach for representing the uncertainty in CPGs based on ontologies. Using this representation, we can evaluate the effect of an activity on the whole clinical process, which can help doctors judge the risk of uncertainty for other activities when making a decision. A variable elimination algorithm is applied to implement the BN inference and a validation of an aspirin therapy scenario for diabetic patients is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sage diabetes guideline, http://sage.wherever.org/cpgs/diabetes/diabetes_html/phtml.html

  2. Aronsky, D., Haug, P.J.: Diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia with a bayesian network. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 632–636 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atoui, H., Fayn, J., Gueyffier, F., Rubel, P.: Cardiovascular risk stratification in decision support systems:a probabilistic approach. application to phealth. Computers in Cardiology 33, 281–284 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, J., Tu, S., Mansfield, J., Boyer, J., McClay, J., Parker, C., Ram, P., Scheitel, S., McDonald, K.: The sage guideline model:a knowledge representation framework for encoding interoperable cpgs. Stanford Medical Informatics Report SMI-2003-0962 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cozman, F.G.: Generalizing variable elimination in bayesian networks. In: Workshop on Probabilistic Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 27–32 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dechter, R.: Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for probabilistic inference. In: Jordan, M.I. (ed.) Learning in Graphical Models, pp. 75–104. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hripcsak, G.: Writing arden syntax medical logic modules. Comput. Biol. Med. 24, 331–363 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashyap, V., Morales, A., Hongsermeier, T.: Creation and maintenance of implementable clinical guideline specifications. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, N.L., Poole, D.: Exploiting causal independence in bayesian network inference. Artificial Intelligence Research, 301–328 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical SocietyB 50(2), 157–224 (1988)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mani, S., Pazzani, M.J.: Guideline generation from data by induction of decision tables using a bayesian network framework. JAMIA supplement, 518–522 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, A.H.: Developing and implementing computerized protocols for standardization of clinical decisions. Annal of Internal Medicine 132(5), 373–383 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Musen, M., Tu, S., Das, A., Shahar, Y.: Eon:a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directedtherapy. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2, 367–388 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohno-Machado, L.: Representing uncertainty in clinical practice guidelines. In: An Invitational Workshop: Towards Representations for Sharable Guidelines (March 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohno-Machado, L., Murphy, S.N., Oliver, D.E., Greenes, R.A., Barnett, G.O.: The guideline interchange format: A model for representing guidelines. Journal of the Americal Medical Informatics Association 5(4), 357–372 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, SanMateo (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ram, P., Berg, D., Tu, S., Mansfield, G., Ye, Q., Abarbanel, R., Beard, N.: Executing clinical practice guidelines using the sage execution engine. Medinfo., 251–255 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoufflet, P., Ohno-Machado, L., Deibel, S., Lee, D., Greenes, R.: Geode-cm:a state-transition framework for clinical management. In: 20th Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care, p. 924 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zheng, HT., Kang, BY., Kim, HG. (2008). An Ontology-Based Bayesian Network Approach for Representing Uncertainty in Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: da Costa, P.C.G., et al. Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I. URSW URSW URSW 2006 2007 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89764-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89765-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics