Skip to main content

Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Management of Oil Spill Responses

  • Conference paper
Applications of Soft Computing

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 58))

Abstract

The selection of combat strategy to oil spill when multi-criteria and multiperson are involved in the decision process is not an easy task. In case of oil spill, urgent decisions must be made so that the available options of responses are activated in such a way that the environmental, social and economic impacts are minimized. In this context, the decision agents involved in the decision process are the environmental agency, a non-governmental organization (NGO), and a company that get in conflict during the decision process because each one defends its own interests. So, a consensus to reach the best viable solution is desirable. The advantages and disadvantages of different types of combat strategy should be weighted, taking into account the preferences and the different point of view of the decision agents. In this context, the process to form a consensus and to elaborate the response strategies necessarily involves a process of decision making with multi-objectives and multi-person (decision agents) so that the importance of social, economic and environmental factors is considered. In this work, the fuzzy evaluationmethod is applied in order to automatically find the best combat response. The method is applied to evaluate combat response to oil spill in the south coast of the Espirito Santo state, Brazil. Simulation results show the viability of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANP: Agência Nacional do Petróleo. Brasília, Brasil. Anuário Estatístico 2004. Distribuição Percentual das Reservas Provadas de Petróleo, segundo Unidades da Federação (2004) (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, Brasil. Resolução N0 293, de 12 de dezembro de 2001. – ANEXO III Critérios para o Dimensionamento da Capacidade Mínima de Resposta, p. 14, DOU 29/04/2002 (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mackay, D., Paterson, S., Trudel, K.: A Mathematical Model of Oil Spill Behavior. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada (1980a)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mackay, D., Paterson, S., Trudel, K.: Oil Spill Processes and Models. Report EE-8, Environmental Protection Service, Canada (1980b)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mackay, D., Shui, W., Houssain, K., Stiver, W., McCurdy, D., Paterson, S.: Development and Calibration of an Oil Spill Behavior Model. Report No. CG-D027-83, US Coast Guard Research and Development Center, Groton, CT (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCay, D.F., Rowe, J.J., Whittier, N., Sankaranarayanan, S., Etkin, D.S.: Estimation of Potential Impacts and Natural Resource Damages of Oil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 107, 11–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reed, M., Aamo, O.M., Daling, P.S.: Quantitative Analysis of Alternate Oil Spill Response Strategies using OSCAR. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 2, 67–74 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reed, M., Daling, P.S., Lewis, A., Ditlevsen, M.K., Brors, B., Clark, J., Aurand, D.: Modelling of Dispersant Application to Oil Spills in Shallow Coastal Waters. Environmental Modelling and Software 19, 681–690 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehr, W., Jones, R., Evans, M., Simeck-Beatty, D., Overstreet, R.: Revisions of the ADIOS Oil Spill Model. Environmental Modelling and Software 17, 191–199 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, Y., Wang, B., Wang, G., Li, W.: Multi-person Multiobjective Fuzzy Decision Making Model for Reservoir Flood Control Operation. Water Resources Management 18, 111–124 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems. Kluwer, Boston (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matos, M.A.: Eliciting and Aggregating Preferences with Fuzzy Inference Systems. In: Antunes, C.H., Figueira, J., Clýmaco, J. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 213–227. CCDRC/FEUC, Coimbra (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X., Wirtz, K.W.: Consensus Oriented Fuzzified Decision Support for Oil Spill Contingency Management. Journal of Hazardous Materials 134, 27–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wirtz, K.W., Baumberger, N., Adam, S., Liu, X.: Oil Spill Impact Minimization under Uncertainty: Evaluating Contingency Simulations of the Prestige Accident. Ecological Economics 61, 417–428 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferreira, J.P.: Análise de estratégias de resposta a derramamento de óleo pesado no litoral do Espírito Santo utilizando modelagem computacional (in Portuguese). Msc. Dissertation, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental, UFES (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. CEPEMAR: Centro de Pesquisas do Mar, Vitória, Brasil. EIA – Estudo de Impacto Ambiental para as Atividades de Produção e Escoamento de Petróleo do Campo de Jubarte – Fase 1 do Desenvolvimento da Produção. RT 017/04 (in Portuguese) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASA: OILMAP – Oil Spill Model Assessment Package. Applied Science Associates (2004), www.appsci.com

  19. Ji, S., Li, X., Du, R.: Tolerance Synthesis using Second-Order Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Genetic Algorithm. International Journal of Production Research 38, 3471–3483 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krohling, R.A., Rigo, D. (2009). Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Management of Oil Spill Responses. In: Mehnen, J., Köppen, M., Saad, A., Tiwari, A. (eds) Applications of Soft Computing. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 58. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89619-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89619-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89618-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89619-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics