Skip to main content

Is a Voting Approach Accurate for Opinion Mining?

  • Conference paper
Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5182))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on classifying documents according to opinion and value judgment they contain. The main originality of our approach is to combine linguistic pre-processing, classification and a voting system using several classification methods. In this context, the relevant representation of the documents allows to determine the features for storing textual data in data warehouses. The conducted experiments on very large corpora from a French challenge on text mining (DEFT) show the efficiency of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benamara, F., Cesarano, C., Picariello, A., Reforgiato, D., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Sentiment analysis: Adjectives and adverbs are better than adjectives alone. In: Proceedings of ICWSM conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bi, Y., McClean, S., Anderson, T.: Combining rough decisions for intelligent text mining using dempster’s rule. Artificial Intelligence Review 26(3), 191–209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brill, E.: Some advances in transformation-based part of speech tagging. In: AAAI, Vol. 1, pp. 722–727 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cornuéjols, A., Miclet, L.: Apprentissage artificiel, Concepts et algorithmes. Eyrolles (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley, Chichester (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, X., Liu, B.: The utility of linguistic rules in opinion mining (poster paper). In: SIGIR 2007, Amsterdam, 23-27 July (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: PageRanking wordnet synsets: An application to opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2007), Prague, CZ, pp. 424–431 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grouin, C., Berthelin, J.-B., El Ayari, S., Heitz, T., Hurault-Plantet, M., Jardino, M., Khalis, Z., Lastes, M.: Présentation de deft 2007 (défi fouille de textes). In: Proceedings of the DEFT 2007 workshop, Plate-forme AFIA, Grenoble, France (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, H., Srivastava, D.: The data warehouse of newsgroups. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Database Theory. LNCS, pp. 471–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Review spam detection (poster paper). In: WWW 2007, Banff, Canada, May 8-12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joachims, T.: Text categorisation with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuncheva, L.I.: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Chichester (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Landauer, T., Dumais, S.: A solution to plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104(2), 211–240 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K.J.: Introduction to WordNet: an on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4), 235–244 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parks, J., Sandberg, I.W.: Universal approximation using radial-basis function networks. Neural Computation 3, 246–257 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Plantié, M.: Extraction automatique de connaissances pour la décision multicritre. PhD thesis, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint Etienne et de l’Université Jean Monnet de Saint Etienne, Nîmes (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Platt, J.: Machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Schoelkopf, B., Burges, C., Smola, A. (eds.) Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rahman, A.F.R., Alam, H., Fairhurst, M.C.: Multiple Classifier Combination for Character Recognition: Revisiting the Majority Voting System and Its Variation, pp. 167–178 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Salton, G., Yang, C.S., Yu, C.T.: A theory of term importance in automatic text analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26, 33–44 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turney, P.D.: Mining the Web for synonyms: PMI–IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In: Proceedings of ECML conference. LNCS, pp. 491–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Turney, P.D., Littman, M.: Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 21(4), 315–346 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y., Hodges, J., Tang, B.: Classification of web documents using a naive bayes method. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 560–564 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, H., Si, L., Callan, J.: Knowledge transfer and opinion detection in the trec 2006 blog track. In: Notebook of Text REtrieval Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Il-Yeol Song Johann Eder Tho Manh Nguyen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Plantié, M., Roche, M., Dray, G., Poncelet, P. (2008). Is a Voting Approach Accurate for Opinion Mining?. In: Song, IY., Eder, J., Nguyen, T.M. (eds) Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5182. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85835-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85836-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics