Skip to main content

Exploring Robustness Enhancements for Logic-Based Passage Filtering

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5177))

Abstract

The use of logic in question answering (QA) promises better accuracy of results, better utilization of the document collection, and a straightforward solution for integrating background knowledge. However, the brittleness of the logical approach still hinders its breakthrough into applications. Several proposals exist for making logic-based QA more robust against erroneous results of linguistic analysis and against gaps in the background knowledge: Extracting useful information from failed proofs, embedding the prover in a relaxation loop, and fusion of logic-based and shallow features using machine learning (ML). In the paper, we explore the effectiveness of these techniques for logic-based passage filtering in the LogAnswer question answering system. An evaluation on factual question of QA@CLEF07 reveals a precision of 54.8% and recall of 44.9% when relaxation results for two distinct provers are combined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burger, J., Cardie, C., Chaudhri, V., Gaizauskas, R., Harabagiu, S., Israel, D., Jacquemin, C., Lin, C., Maiorano, S., Miller, G., Moldovan, D., Ogden, B., Prager, J., Riloff, E., Singhal, A., Shrihari, R., Strzalkowski, T., Voorhees, E., Weishedel, R.: Issues, tasks, and program structures to roadmap research in question & answering (Q&A). NIST (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peñas, A., Rodrigo, Á., Sama, V., Verdejo, F.: Overview of the answer validation exercise 2006. In: Working Notes for the CLEF 2006 Workshop (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., Dolan, B.: The third PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, June 2007, pp. 1–9. ACL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moldovan, D., Bowden, M., Tatu, M.: A temporally-enhanced PowerAnswer in TREC 2006. In: Proc. of TREC-2006, Gaithersburg, MD (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haghighi, A.D., Ng, A.Y., Manning, C.D.: Robust textual inference via graph matching. In: Proc. of HLT/EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, BC, pp. 387–394 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glöckner, I.: University of Hagen at QA@CLEF 2007: Answer validation exercise. In: Working Notes for the CLEF 2007 Workshop, Budapest (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bos, J., Markert, K.: When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesn’t). In: Proc. of 2nd PASCAL RTE Challenge Workshop (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glöckner, I.: Towards Logic-Based Question Answering under Time Constraints. In: Proc. of ICAIA 2008, Hong Kong, pp. 13–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hartrumpf, S.: Hybrid Disambiguation in Natural Language Analysis. Der Andere Verlag, Osnabrück (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helbig, H.: Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Leveling, J.: IRSAW – towards semantic annotation of documents for question answering. In: CNI Spring 2007 Task Force Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining. Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pelzer, B., Wernhard, C.: System Description: E-KRHyper. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603, pp. 508–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Baumgartner, P., Furbach, U., Pelzer, B.: Hyper Tableaux with Equality. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baumgartner, P., Furbach, U., Niemelä, I.: Hyper Tableaux. In: Orłowska, E., Alferes, J.J., Moniz Pereira, L. (eds.) JELIA 1996. LNCS, vol. 1126, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.: The TPTP Problem Library: CNF Release v1.2.1. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(2), 177–203 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ignac Lovrek Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Glöckner, I., Pelzer, B. (2008). Exploring Robustness Enhancements for Logic-Based Passage Filtering. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85563-7_77

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85563-7_77

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85563-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics