Skip to main content

Correction of Timing Errors of Artificial Neural Network Rainfall-Runoff Models

  • Chapter
Practical Hydroinformatics

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 68))

Abstract

In this study, multi-layer feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed for forecasting the runoff from the Geer catchment in Belgium. The models produced a good overall approximation of the hydrograph, but the forecasts tended to be plagued by timing errors. These were caused by the use of previous discharge as ANN input, which became dominant and effectively caused lagged forecasts. Therefore, an aggregated objective function was tested that punishes the ANN model for having a timing error. The gradient-based training algorithm that was used had difficulty with finding good optima for this function, but nevertheless some hopeful results were found. There seems to be a trade-off between having good overall fit and having correct timing, so further research is suggested to find balanced ANN models that satisfy both objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Abrahart RJ, See L (2000) Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments. Hydrol. Process. 14(11): 2157–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anctil F, Michel C, Perrin C, Andréassian V (2004) A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for streamflow forecasting. J. Hydrol. 286: 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Campolo M, Andreussi P, Soldati, A (1999) River flood forecasting with a neural network model. Water Resour. Res. 35(4): 1191–1197

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway AJ, Macpherson KP, Brown JC (1998) Delayed time series predictions with neural networks. Neurocomputing 18: 81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos NJ, Rientjes THM (2005) Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall–runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 9: 111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Solomatine DP (2001) River flow forecasting using artificial neural networks. Phys. Chem. Earth (B) 26(1): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Edijatno N, Nascimento O, Yang X, Makhlouf Z, Michel C (1999) GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters. Hydrol. Sci. J. 44(2): 263–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue TS, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Holz A, Braatz D (2000) A multistep automatic calibration scheme for river forecasting models. J. Hydrometeorol. 1: 524–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu KL, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res. 31(10): 2517–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Srinivasulu S (2004) Development of effective and efficient rainfall–runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. Water Resour. Res. 40(4): W04302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis PK, Bras RL (1980) Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model, 2, applications and results. Water Resour. Res. 16(6): 1034–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minns AW, Hall MJ (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J. 41(3): 399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models; part I – a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10: 282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2003) Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J. Hydrol. 279: 275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamseldin AY (1997) Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling. J. Hydrol. 199: 272–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Eli RN (1995) Neural-network models of rainfall-runoff process. J. Water Resour. Plng. Mgmt. 121(6): 499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth E, Brath A, Montanari A (2000) Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. J. Hydrol. 239: 132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Vos, N., Rientjes, T. (2009). Correction of Timing Errors of Artificial Neural Network Rainfall-Runoff Models. In: Abrahart, R.J., See, L.M., Solomatine, D.P. (eds) Practical Hydroinformatics. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 68. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics