Aristotle states that everything worth doing is worth doing well. The economist James Buchanan claims that this is not the principle of economics, which states rather that it is not worth it to do everything well. Aristotle founded his ethics on the principle of arete or excellence, literally bestness. The human being should aim at excellence in all actions. Economics, however, is founded on the principle of efficiency. Everything worth doing should be done efficiently. It is not efficient to do too well, and there are actions and things that should not be done or made too well. Therefore, not everything worth doing is worth doing well. It is worth making mass products, but it is not worth making them in such a way that they are as good as possible. It would be rather beside the point to make mass products so well. They would be too expensive and not mass products anymore. The economist has to adopt his actions to economic demand, not to conceptions of intrinsic excellence. It is also, economically speaking, not good to produce goods that are excellent but do not succeed in the market.
Ethics and economics are inimical brothers since their normative content seems to be contradictory. In ethics, the task of the human, to ergon tu anthropu as Aristotle says, is to realize the best. In economics, the task is to realize the efficient; in technology, to realize the effective. If we look closer, however, ethical and economic theory are not as contradictory as first appears. Doing the best for mass demand means not producing the best but producing the best suited to the needs of the market, i.e. consumer demand. On the other hand, it is also a postulate of ethics to consider the circumstances that might distinguish the best in a given situation from the best as a whole. It might under given circumstances, for instance, be the best to realize a solution that is considered to be only second best if circumstances are improved. It is worth realizing mass production well, although the result of the action will not be the best possible product but a mass product.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BOWIE, NORMAN E.: “A Kantian Approach to Business Ethics”, in: ROBERT E. FREDERICK (Ed.): A Companion to Business Ethics, Oxford (Blackwell) 2002, pp. 3-16.
BUCHANAN, JAMES M.: “Die konstitutionelle Ökonomik der Ethik”, in: PETER KOSLOWSKI (Ed.): Neuere Entwicklungen in der Wirtschaftsethik und Wirtschaftsphilosophie, Berlin (Springer) 1992, pp. 21-46.
COLEMAN, JAMES S.: “Social Organization of the Corporation”, in: THOMAS DONALDSON, PATRICIA H. WERHANE (Eds.): Ethical Issues in Business. A Philosophical Approach, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. (Prentice Hall), 4th edition 1993, pp. 172-190.
DE LA COURT, PIETER: Interest van Holland (The True Interest, and Political Maxims of the Republick of Holland and West-Friesland), 1662, 2nd edition 1669 under the title Aanwysing der heilsame politike gronden en maximen van de republike van Holland, Chapter IX. English translation of the 2nd edition by John Campbell, Nourse 1742, under the title Political Maxims of the State of Holland, reprinted in excerpts in: Commerce, Culture, and Liberty. Readings on Capitalism Before Adam Smith, edited by Henry C. Clark, Indianapolis (Liberty Fund) 2003.
DONALDSON, THOMAS; DUNFEE, THOMAS W.: “Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory”, in: Academy of Management Review, 19 (1994), pp. 252-279.
EVAN, WILLIAM M.; FREEMAN, R. EDward: “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism”, in: THOMAS DONALDSON, PATRICIA H. WERHANE (Eds.): Ethical Issues in Business. A Philosophical Approach, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. (Prentice Hall) 4th edition 1993, pp. 166-171.
GAUTHIER, DAVID: Morals by Agreement, Oxford (Oxford University Press) 1985.
GERWEN, JEF VAN: “Corporate Culture and Ethics”, in: JOHAN VERSTRAETEN (Ed.): Business Ethics. Broadening the Perspectives. Leuven (Peeters) 2000, pp. 43-78.
HOBBES, THOMAS: Leviathan, edited by W. G. Pogson Smith, Oxford (Clarendon Press) 1909. Reprint of the edition of 1651, Chap. XIII. Of the Natural Condition of Mankind, As Concerning Their Felicity, And Misery, reprinted as online edition in: The Online Library of Liberty, Liberty Fund 2005.
HOMANN, KARL: Vorteile und Anreize, Tübingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2002.
KOSLOWSKI, PETER (1985): “Maximum Coordination of Entelechial Individuals. The Metaphysics of Leibniz and Social Philosophy”, in: Ratio. An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 27 (1985), pp. 160-177.
KOSLOWSKI, PETER (1985b): “Religion, Ökonomie, Ethik. Eine sozialtheoretische und ontologische Analyse ihres Zusammenhanges“, in: PETER KOSLOWSKI (Ed.): Die religiöse Dimension der Gesellschaft. Religion und ihre Theorien, Tübingen (Mohr Siebeck) 1985, pp. 76-96.
KOSLOWSKI, PETER: Principles of Ethical Economy, Dordrecht (Kluwer) 2002, paperback edition. German original: Prinzipien der Ethischen Ökonomie. Grundlegung der Wirtschaftsethik, Tübingen (Mohr Siebeck) 1988.
KOSLOWSKI, PETER: Philosophien der Offenbarung. Antiker Gnostizismus, Franz von Baader, Schelling, Paderborn (Ferdinand Schöningh), 2nd edition 2003.
KOSLOWSKI, PETER: “What Is Christianity Good For?”, in: Philosophia Reformata. Orgaan van de Vereniging voor Calvinistische Wijsbegeerte, 72 (2007), pp. 34-52.
KOSLOWSKI, PETER: “Argumentum ethico-oeconomicum. The Argument for the Existence of God from Ethical Economy”, in: STEFANO SEMPLICI (Ed.): Philosophy of Religion Today? In Memoriam Marco M. Olivetti. Archivio di Filosofia - Archives of Philosophy, Pisa, Roma (Fabrizio Serra) 2008 (forthcoming).
KRINGS, HERMANN: System und Freiheit, Freiburg im Breisgau (Alber) 1980.
MUSSCHENGA,ALBERT W.: “Integrity - Personal, Moral, and Professional”, in: ALBERT W. MUSSCHENGA, WOUTER VAN HAAFTEN, BEN SPIECKER, MARC SLORS (Eds.): Personal and Moral Identity, Dordrecht (Kluwer) 2002, pp. 169-201.
RATZINGER, JOSEPH (POPE BENEDICT XVI): Marktwirtschaft und Kirche, 1985, English translation: Market Economy and the Church, online in: http://www.acton. org/publicat/occasionalpapers/ratzinger.html.
SCHELLING, F. W. J.: Philosophical Inquiries into the Nature of Human Freedom (1809), translated by James Gutmann, La Salle, Illinois (Open Court) 1936.
SEN, AMARTYA: “Isolation, Assurance, and the Social Rate of Discount”, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81 (1967), pp. 112-124.
SHACKLE, G.L.S.: Imagination and the Nature of Choice, Edinburgh (Edinburgh University Press) 1979.
SPAEMANN, ROBERT: “Nebenwirkungen als moralisches Problem”, in: R. SPAEMANN. Kritik der politischen Utopie, Stuttgart (Klett Cotta) 1977, pp. 167-182.
TAYLOR, CHARLES: Sources of the Self, Cambridge, Mass. (Harvard University Press) 1989.
WEBER, MAX: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen (Mohr Siebeck) 1922.
WEBER, MAX: The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism (1904/5), translated by Talcott Parsons with an introduction by Anthony Giddens, London (Routledge Classics) 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koslowski, P. (2008). Some Principles of Ethical Economy. In: Trends in Business and Economic Ethics. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79472-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79472-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79471-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79472-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)