Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Voice and Respiratory Function

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery of Larynx and Trachea

Abstract

Voice is multidimensional. Audio recording is the most important basic requisite for voice quality assessment. Once a high-quality complete recording has been attained, it can be stored and remains available. Existing research does not support the complete substitution of instrumental measures for auditory perceptual assessment. To be valuable, however, perceptual assessment should follow a standard procedure, as does the voice recording. A currently used scale for making perceptual judgments is the GRBAS scale. Videolaryngostroboscopy is the main clinical tool for diagnosing the etiology of voice disorders, but it can also be used to assess the quality of vocal fold vibration and thus evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment. The simplest aerodynamic parameter of voicing is the maximum phonation time (MPT), in seconds. It consists of the prolongation of an /a:/ for as long as possible after maximal inspiration and at a spontaneous, comfortable pitch and loudness. A reduction of possible bias (e.g., supportive respiratory capabilities compensating for poor membranous vocal fold closure) is possible by computing the ratio or quotient : Averaged phonation airflow or PQ = VC (ml)/MPT (s). Accu­rate estimation of subglottal pressure can be achieved by measuring the intraoral air pressure produced during the repeated pronunciation of /pVp/ syllables (i.e., a vowel between two ­plosive consonants). Among Voice Range Profile parameters, the highest and lowest frequencies and the softest intensity (decibels, or dBA, at 30 cm) seem most sensitive for changes in voice quality. Although subjective by definition, self-­evaluation is of great importance in clinical practice. Careful quantification is needed for self-evaluation to be compared and correlated with the objective as­­sessment provided by the voice, an important adjuvant technique, laboratory. The Voice Handicap Index is a largely diffused, validated protocol. Electromyography (EMG), an important adjuvant technique, is an electrophysiological investigation of neuromuscular function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dejonckere PH (2000) Perceptual and laboratory assessment of dysphonia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am;33:731-750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Titze I (1995) Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Sum­mary Statement. National Center for Voice and Speech. The University of Iowa, Denver Co, 36 pp

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sataloff RT (1997) Professional Voice. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watson C (1994) Database management of the voice clinic and laboratory. J Voice;3:99-106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, van Wijck-Warnaar I, Dejonckere PH (2003) Effects of voice therapy on the voice range profiles of dysphonic patients. J Voice;17:544-556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dejonckere PH (1998) Effect of louder voicing on acoustical measurements in dysphonic patients. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol;23:79-84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dejonckere PH, Lebacq J (2001) Plasticity of voice quality: a prognostic factor for outcome of voice therapy? J Voice;15:251-256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dejonckere PH (2007) Améliorer la fiabilité de l’analyse perceptive de la voix pathologique par un support visuel sonagraphique. In: Klein-Dallant C (Éd). Voix parlée et chantée. Editions Ortho, Paris, pp. 35-45

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dejonckere PH (2007) Critères acoustiques de fluence pour l’évaluation des dysphonies spasmodiques. In: Klein-Dallant C (Éd). Voix parlée et chantée. Editions Ortho, Paris, pp. 63-73

    Google Scholar 

  10. Revis J, Barberis S,Giovanni A (2000) Definition of a new temporal voice onset measurement. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord);121:291-296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirano M (1981) Clinical Examination of Voice. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dejonckere PH, Lebacq J (1996) Acoustic, perceptual, aerodynamic and anatomical correlations in voice pathology. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec;58:326-332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Bodt, M, Wuyts, F,Van de Heyning, P, Croeckx, C (1997) Test - re-test Study of GRBAS-Scale. J Voice;11:74-80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier Buchman L, Millet B (1996) Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol;117:219-224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen N, Wilson JA (2004) The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol;261: 429-434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nawka T, Anders LC, Wendler J (1994) Die auditive Beurteilung heiserer Stimmen nach dem RBH-System. Sprache Stimme Gehör;18:130-133

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wuyts F, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PH (1999) Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than of an ordinal scale ? An experiment with the GRBAS-scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice;13:508-517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moerman M, Martens JP, Dejonckere PH (2004) Application of the voice handicap index in 45 patients with substitution voicing after total laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otolaryngol;261:423-428

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moerman M, Pieters G, Martens JP, Van Der Borgt MJ, Dejonckere PH (2004) Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol;261:541-547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, Dejonckere PH (2004) The use of acoustic parameters for the evaluation of voice therapy for dysphonic patients. Acta Acustica United Acustica;90:520-527

    Google Scholar 

  21. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, Dejonckere PH (2004) Documentation of progress in voice therapy: perceptual, acoustic and laryngostroboscopic findings pretherapy and postterapy. J Voice;18:325-339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, Dejonckere PH (2004) Self-assessment of voice therapy for chronic dysphonia. Clin Otolaryngol;29:66-74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dejonckere PH, Crevier L, Elbaz E, Marraco M, Millet B, Remacle M, Woisard V (1999) Quantitative rating of videolar­yng­ostroboscopy: factor analysis of the vibratory ­characteristics. In: Dejonckere PH, Peters H (Eds). Communication and its Disorders: A Science in Progress. Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen, pp. 170-171

    Google Scholar 

  24. Södersten M, Hertegard S, Hammarberg B (1995) Glottal closure, transglottal air flow and voice quality in healthy middle-aged women. J Voice;9:182-197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sulter AM, Schutte HK, Miller DG (1996) Standardized laryngeal videostroboscopic rating: differences between untrained and trained male and female subjects, and effects of varying sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age. J Voice;10:175-189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, Hosseini EG, Kempen PA, Kersing W, Dejonckere PH (2002) Effects of voice therapy as objectively evaluated by digitized laryngeal stroboscopic imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol;111:902-908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dejonckere PH, Wieneke GH, Lebacq J (1989) Laryngostro­boscopy and glottic dysrhythmia’s. Acta Otorhi­nolaryngol Belg;43:19-29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirano M, Bless DM (1993) Videostroboscopic Examination of the Larynx. Singular Publishing, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  29. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, Kersing W, Dejonckere PH (2005) Accuracy of measurements on videostroboscopic images of the vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol;114:443-450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eysholdt U, Rosanowski F, Hoppe U (2003) Measurement and interpretation of irregular vocal fold vibrations. HNO;51: 710-716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Imagawa H, Kiritani S, Hirose H (1987) High speed digital image recording system for observing vocal fold vibration using an image sensor. J Med Electron Biol Eng;25: 284-290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Neubauer, J, Mergell P, Eysholdt U, Herzl, H (2001) Spatio-temporal analysis of irregular vocal fold oscillations: biphonation due to desynchronization of spatial modes. J Acoust Soc Am;110:3179-3192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Svec JG, Schutte HK (1996) Videokymography: high-speed linescanning of vocal fold vibration. J Voice;10:201-205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dejonckere PH, Versnel H (2005) High speed imaging of vocal fold vibration: analysis by 4 synchronous line-scans of onset, offset and register breaks. Proceedings IFOS Congress, Rome, 9pp*

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hirano M (1989) Objective evaluation of the human voice: clinical aspects. Folia Phoniatr;41:89-144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Neiman GS, Edeson B (1981) Procedural aspects of eliciting maximum phonation time. Folia Phoniatr;33:285-293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kent RD, Kent JF, Rosenbek JC (1987) Maximum performance tests of speech production. J Speech Hear Res;52:367-387

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rau D, Beckett RL (1984) Aerodynamic assessment of vocal function using hand-held spirometers. J Speech Hear Dis;49:183-188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Morris S, Jawad MSM, Eccles R (1992) Relationships between vital capacity, height and nasal airway resistance in asymptomatic volunteers. Rhinology;30:259-264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Colton RH, Casper JK (1996) Understanding Voice Problems. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  41. Verdolini K (1994) Voice disorders. In: Tomblin JB, Morris HL, Spriesterbach OC (Eds). Diagnosis in Speech-Langu­age Patho­l­ogy. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, pp. 247-306

    Google Scholar 

  42. Woo P, Casper J, Colton R, Brewer D (1994) Aerodynamic and stroboscopic findings before and after microlaryngeal phonosurgery. J Voice;8:186-194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Woo P, Colton RH, Shangold L (1987) Phonatory air flow analysis in patients with laryngeal disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol;96:549-555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schutte HK (1980) The efficiency of voice production, Thesis. University of Groningen. Kemper, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schutte HK (1992) Integrated aerodynamic measurements. J Voice;6:127-134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fritzell B, Hallen O, Sundberg J (1974) Evaluation of teflon injection procedures for paralytic dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr;26:414-421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hirano M, Koike Y, von Leden H (1968) Maximum phonation time and air usage during phonation. Folia Phoniatr;20:185-201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Murry T, Bone RC (1978) Aerodynamic relationships associated with normal phonation and paralytic dysphonia. Laryngoscope;88:100-109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rothenberg M (1973) A new inverse filtering technique for deriving the glottal airflow during voicing. J Acoust Soc Am;53:1632-1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Baken RJ, Orlikoff R (2000) Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice. Singular Thomson Learning, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rothenberg M (1982) Interpolating subglottal pressure from oral pressure. J Speech Hear Disord;47:218-224

    Google Scholar 

  52. Titze IR (1992) Phonation threshold pressure - a missing link in glottal aerodynamics. J Acoust Soc;91:2926-2935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Titze IR (1992) Acoustic interpretation of the voice profile (phonetogram). J Speech Hear Res;35:21-34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Colton RH, Woo P (1995) Measuring vocal fold function. In: Rubin JS, Sataloff RT, Korovin GS, et al (Eds). Diagnosis and Treatment of Voice Disorders. Igaku - Shoin, New York, pp. 290-315

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hyatt RE, Black LF (1973) The flow-volume curve: a current perspective. Am Rev Respir Dis;107:191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Robin ED (1982) Respiratory Medicine. In Medicine, Scientific American, New York, 14;III:1-7**

    Google Scholar 

  57. Slavit DH (1995) Role of the pulmonary junction in voice assessment. In: Rubin JS, Sataloff RT, Korovin GS, Gould WJ (Eds). Diagnosis and Treatment of Voice Disorders. Igaku - Shoin, New York, pp. 327-340

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wolfe V, Fitch J, Martin D (1997) Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types. Folia Phoniatr Logop;49:292-299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Titze I, Liang H (1993) Comparison of Fo extraction models for high precision voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res;36:1120-1133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yu P, Ouaknine M,Giovanni A (2000) Clinical significance of calculating the coefficients of Lyapunov in the objective assessment of dysphonia. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 5:301-305

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dejonckere PH, van Wijngaarden HA (2001) Retropharyngeal autologous fat transplantation for congenital short palate: a nasometric assessment of functional results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol;110:168-172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schultz-Coulon HJ (1990) Stimmfeldmessung. Berlin, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  63. Heylen L, Wuyts FL, Mertens F, De Bodt M, Dan de Heyning PH (2002) Normative voice range profiles of male and female professional voice users. J Voice;16:1-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Heylen L, Wuyts F, Mertens F, De Bodt M, Pattyn J, Croeckx C, Van de Heyning P (1998) Evaluation of the vocal performance of children using a voice range profile index. J Speech Lang Hear Res;41:232-238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Van de Heyning PH, et al (1996) Research work of the Belgian study group on voice disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg;50:321-386

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wuyts F, De Bodt M, Molenberghs G, Remacle M, Heylen L, Millet B, Van Lierde K, Raes J, Van de Heyning PH (2000) The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res;43:796-809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, Newman CW (1997) The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol;6:66-70

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T (2004) Development and validation of the voice handicap index - 10. Laryngoscope;114:1549-1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dejonckere PH (1996) Electroglottography: a useful method in voice investigation. In: Pais-Clemente M (Ed). Voice Update. Excerpta Medica. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 29-33

    Google Scholar 

  70. Fourcin A, Abberton E, Miller D, et al (1995) Laryngography. Eur J Disord Commun;30:101-115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Blitzer A (1995) Laryngeal electromyography. In: Rubin JS, Sataloff RT, Korovin GS, Gould WJ (Eds). Diagnosis and Treatment of Voice Disorders. Igaku - Shoin, New York, pp. 316-326

    Google Scholar 

  72. Dejonckere PH (1987) EMG of the Larynx. Press Productions, Liège

    Google Scholar 

  73. Dejonckere PH, Knoops P, Lebacq J (1988) Evoked muscular potentials in laryngeal muscles. Acta Otolaryngol Belg;42:494-501

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Munin MC, Murry T, Rosen CA (2000) Laryngeal electromyography. Otolaryngol clin North Am;33:759-770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sataloff RT, Mandel S, Mann EA, Ludlow CL (2004) Practice parameter: laryngeal electromyography (an evidence-based review). J Voice;18:261-274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Moerman M, Martens JP, Crevier-Buchman L, de Haan E, Grand S, Tessier C, Woisard V, Dejonckere PH (2006) The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol;263(5):435-439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Moerman M, Martens, JP,Van Der Borgt MJ, Pelemans M, Gillis M, Dejonckere PH (2006) Perceptual evaluation of substitution voices: development and evaluation of the (I)INFVo rating scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol;263:183-187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchmann L, Friedrich G, Van De Heyning P, Remacle M, Woisard V (2001) A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol;258:77-82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Mahieu HF (2000) Multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics following radiotherapy for early glottic cancer and the DSI. Eur Arch Otolaryngol; 257(Suppl 1):S20

    Google Scholar 

  80. Dejonckere PH, Crevier L, Elbaz E, Marraco M, Millet B, Remacle M, Woisard V (2000) Clinical implementation of a multidimensional basic protocol for assessing functional results of voice therapy. In: Jahnke K, Fischer M (Eds). Proceedings EUFOS Congress. Monduzzi editore, Berlin, pp. 561-565

    Google Scholar 

  81. Friedrich G, Dejonckere PH (2005) The voice evaluation protocol of the European Laryngological Society. First results of a multicenter study. Laryngorhinootologie;84:744-752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Dejonckere PH, Crevier-Buchman L, Marie JP, Moerman M, Remacle M, Woisard V (2003) Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) - basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol;124:279-283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Institute of Phoniatrics and Logopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, AZU F.02.504, 85500, Nl-3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Philippe H. Dejonckere

Authors
  1. Philippe H. Dejonckere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe H. Dejonckere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Mont-Godinne, Univ. Hospital of Louvain at, Yvoir, 5530, Belgium

    Marc Remacle

  2. Hals-Nasen-Ohren Abteilung, Landeskrankenhaus Klagenfurt, St. Veiter Str. 47, Klagenfurt, 9026, Austria

    Hans Edmund Eckel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dejonckere, P.H. (2009). Assessment of Voice and Respiratory Function. In: Remacle, M., Eckel, H. (eds) Surgery of Larynx and Trachea. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79136-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79136-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79135-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79136-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation