Skip to main content

A Comparison of Five Methods for Signal Intensity Standardization in MRI

  • Conference paper
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2008

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Abstract

A major problem in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the lack of a pulse sequence dependent standardized intensity scale like the Hounsfield units in computed tomography. This affects the post processing of the acquired images as, in general, segmentation and registration methods depend on the observed image intensities. Different approaches dealing with this problem were proposed recently. In this article we will describe and compare five state-of-the-art standardization methods regarding speed, applicability and accuracy. As a quality measure the mean distance and the Kullback-Leibler divergence are considered. For the experiments 28 MRI head volume images, acquired during clinical routine, were used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jäger F, Deuerling-Zheng Y, Frericks B, et al. A new method for MRI intensity standardization with application to lesion detection in the brain. In: Kobbelt L, et al, editors. Vision Modeling and Visualization. Köln: Aka GmBH; 2006. p. 269–76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nyúl LG, Udupa JK, Zhang X. New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19(2):143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hellier P. Consistent intensity correction of MR images. Proc ICIP. 2003;1:1109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cox IJ, Roy S, Hingorani SL. Dynamic histogram warping of image pairs for constant image brightness. Proc ICIP. 1995; p. 2366–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weisenfeld N, Warfield S. Normalization of joint image-intensity statistics in MRI using the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2004;1:101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jäger F, Nyul L, Frericks B, et al. Whole body MRI intensity standardization. Proc BVM. 2007; p. 459–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bergeest, JP., Jäger, F. (2008). A Comparison of Five Methods for Signal Intensity Standardization in MRI. In: Tolxdorff, T., Braun, J., Deserno, T.M., Horsch, A., Handels, H., Meinzer, HP. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2008. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78640-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics