Skip to main content

Empirical Comparison of “Hard” and “Soft” Label Propagation for Relational Classification

  • Conference paper
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4894))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we differentiate between hard and soft label propagation for classification of relational (networked) data. The latter method assigns probabilities or class-membership scores to data instances, then propagates these scores throughout the networked data, whereas the former works by explicitly propagating class labels at each iteration. We present a comparative empirical study of these methods applied to a relational binary classification task, and evaluate two approaches on both synthetic and real–world relational data. Our results indicate that while neither approach dominates the other over the entire range of input data parameters, there are some interesting and non–trivial tradeoffs between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B.E., Indyk, P.: Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. In: Haas, L.M., Tiwary, A. (eds.) Proceedings of SIGMOD-1998, ACM International Conference on Management of Data, Seattle, US, pp. 307–318. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, N., Getoor, L., Koller, D., Pfeffer, A.: Learning probabilistic relational models. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-1999, pp. 1300–1309 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qin, T., Liu, T.Y., Zhang, X.D., Chen, Z., Ma, W.Y.: A study of relevance propagation for web search. In: SIGIR 2005: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 408–415. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Galstyan, A., Cohen, P.R.: Inferring useful heuristics from the dynamics of iterative relational classifiers. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-2005, 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galstyan, A., Cohen, P.R.: Relational classification through three–state epidemic dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, Florence, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Macskassy, S., Provost, F.: A simple relational classifier. In: Proceeding of the Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining in conjunction with KDD-2003 (MRDM-2003), Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macskassy, S., Provost, F.: Classification in networked data: A toolkit and a univariate case study. In: Working paper CeDER-04-08, Stern School of Business, New York University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Macskassy, S., Provost, F.: Netkit-srl: A toolkit for network learning and inference. In: Proceeding of the NAACSOS Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macskassy, S., Provost, F.: Suspicion scoring based on guilt-by-association, collective inference, and focused data access. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, VA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shakery, A., Zhai, C.: Relevance propagation for topic distillation uiuc trec 2003 web track experiments. In: TREC, pp. 673–677 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Szummer, M., Jaakkola, T.: Partially labeled classification with markov random walks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 14 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gyongyi, Z., Garcia-Molina, H., Pedersen, J.: Combating web spam with trustrank. In: Proceedings of the 30th VLDB Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tishby, N., Slonim, N.: Data clustering by markovian relaxation and the information bottleneck method. In: NIPS, pp. 640–646 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, X., Ghahramani, Z.: Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCallum, A., Nigam, K., Rennie, J., Seymore, K.: Automating the construction of internet portals with machine learning. Information Retrieval Journal 3, 127–163 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hendrik Blockeel Jan Ramon Jude Shavlik Prasad Tadepalli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Galstyan, A., Cohen, P.R. (2008). Empirical Comparison of “Hard” and “Soft” Label Propagation for Relational Classification. In: Blockeel, H., Ramon, J., Shavlik, J., Tadepalli, P. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4894. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78469-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78469-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78468-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78469-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics