Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 117))

With the increasing importance of cognitive aspects in decision making, this research addresses how human cognitive abilities, mainly situation awareness and mental models, can be used to drive the decision process in complex decision situations. Cognitive orientation has long been regarded as an important consideration in the development and application of decision support systems (DSS). Rather than cognitive orientation, a data-driven DSS emphasizes access to and manipulation of a series of company internal and external data, compared to a model-driven DSS underpinned by statistical, financial, optimization or simulation models. A business intelligence (BI) system is essentially a kind of data-driven DSS therefore shares the similar drawbacks with traditional DSS. A framework of cognitive BI system is firstly developed. A model of cognition-driven decision process is then proposed based on the system framework. In this framework and decision model, data retrieval, information filtering and knowledge presentation are based on the tacit knowledge elicited from the decision-maker. The final decision is no longer the direct output of a computer system, but the result of decision-making cycles of human-machine interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M.J., Tenney, Y.J. & Pew, R.W. 1995, Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems, Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnott, D. & Pervan, G. 2005, A critical analysis of decision support systems research, Journal of Information Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, R. 2002, Experience Management: Foundations, Development Methodology, and Internet-Based Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, C.-H. & Ge, X. 2006, The design of a web-based cognitive modeling system to support ill-structured problem solving, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, J.Q. & Lee, S.M. 2003, An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making, Decision Support Systems, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2006, What do companies want from business intelligence? vol. 2006, no. 11, http://www.eiu.com/

  7. Eden, C. 1988, Cognitive mapping, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, T.J., Reising, J.M. & Britten-Austin, H.G. 1987, Workload and situation awareness in future aircraft, SAE Technical Paper, no. 871803

    Google Scholar 

  9. Endsley, M.R. 1995, Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Endsley, M.R. 2000, Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review, in M.R. Endsley & D.J. Garland (eds), Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  11. Endsley, M.R., Bolte, B. & Jones, D.G. 2003, Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design, 1st edn, Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flach, J.M. 1995, Situation awareness: proceed with caution, Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gnyawali, D.R. & Tyler, B.B. 2005, Cause mapping in strategic management research: processes, issues, and observations, in J. David, J. Ketchen & D.D. Bergh (eds), Research Methodology in Strategic and Management, vol. 2, Elsevier, San Diego, pp. 225–257

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gruman, G. 2007, Rethinking business intelligence, InfoWorld, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton, W.L. 1987, Situation awareness metrics program, SAE Technical Paper, no. 871767

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson-Laird, P.N., Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. 1998, Mental models: a gentle guide for outsiders, Sistemi Intelligenti, vol. 9, pp. 68–33

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klein, G.A. & Crandall, B.W. 1995, The role of mental simulation in naturalistic decision making, in P. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caird & K. Vincente (eds), Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems, vol. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 324–358

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klein, G.A., Calderwook, R. & Macgregor, D. 1989, Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: System and Humans, vol. 19, pp. 462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo, F.-Y. 1998, Managerial intuition and the development of executive support systems, Decision Support Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lipshitz, R., Klein, G., Orasanu, J. & Salas, E. 2001, Taking stock of naturalistic decision making, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mintzberg, H. 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Porac, J.F. & Thomas, H. 1990, Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition, Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 224–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Resnick, M.L. 2003, Situation awareness applications to executive dashboard design, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Conference, 2003, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, http://www.entrepreneurship.fiu.edu/downloads/publications/articles/situationAwareness.doc

  24. Sarter, N.B. & Woods, D.D. 1991, Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwenk, C.R. 1984, Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shim, J.P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J.F., Power, D.J., Sharda, R. & Carlsson, C. 2002, Past, present, and future of decision support technology, Decision Support Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon, H.A. 1977, The New Science of Management Decision, Revised edition, Prentice Hall College Div, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, S.K., Watson, H.J. & Watson, R.T. 2002, EIS support for the strategic management process, Decision Support Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smalltree, H. 2006, BI’s founding father speaks: Q&A with Howard Dresner, viewed 23 April 2007 http://searchdatamanagement.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid91_gci1174419,00.html

  30. Smith, K. & Hancock, P.A. 1995, Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness, Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanners, M. & French, H.T. 2005, An empirical study of the relationship between situation awareness and decision making, DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory, http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/corporate/reports/DSTO-TR-1687.pdf

  32. Sutcliffe, K.M. & Weber, K. 2003, The high cost of accurate knowledge, Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vidulich, M.A. 1995, The role of scope as a feature of situation awareness metrics, Proceedings of the International Conference on Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press, FL, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walters, B.A., Jiang, J.J. & Klein, G. 2003, Strategic information and strategic decision making: the EIS/CEO interface in smaller manufacturing companies, Information &Management, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yadav, S.B. & Khazanchi, D. 1992, Subjective understanding in strategic decision making: an information systems perspective, Decision Support Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rouse, W.B. & Morris, N.M. 1985, On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Technical Report. Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Man-Machine Systems Research, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niu, L., Lu, J., Zhang, G. (2008). Cognitive Orientation in Business Intelligence Systems. In: Da Ruan, Hardeman, F., van der Meer, K. (eds) Intelligent Decision and Policy Making Support Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78308-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78308-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78306-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78308-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics