Abstract
The introduction of road pricing has important budgetary and income distribution consequences. In countries like Denmark, due to high marginal rates of taxation, raising government revenue and redistributing income is associated with substantial distortionary costs and administrative costs. This chapter argues that an evaluation of the introduction of road pricing needs to take into account not only the effects on congestion and on the environment, but also the effects on the government’s budget and the income distribution consequences. A stylised Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model which represents the interaction of the consumption of transport and of traffic congestion with leisure is used to illustrate this point. In addition, model simulations show that the introduction of road pricing may increase environmental damage, may make it desirable to reduce transport infrastructure and potentially may be associated with a significant double dividend.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bovenberg, L.A. (1999). Green tax reform and the double dividend: a updated reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2: 157–183.
Corlett, W.J., Hague, D.C. (1953). Complementarity and the excess burden of taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 21: 21–30.
Dixit, A, Munk, K.J. (1977). Welfare effect of tax and price changes. A correction. Journal of Public Economics, 8: 103–107.
Goulder, L.H., Parry, I.W.H., Williams, R.C., Burtraw, D. (1999). The Cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72: 329–360.
Mayeres, I., Proost, S. (1997). Optimal tax and public investment rules and the congestion type of externalities. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(22): 261–279.
Mayeres, I., Proost, S. (2001). Marginal tax reform, externalities and income distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 79: 343–363.
Munk, K.J. (2000). Administrative costs and the double dividend. Working Paper, EPRU, University of Copenhagen.
Munk, K.J. (2002). What determines the optimal commodity tax structure from an intuitive point of view?, Working Paper, EPRU, University of Copenhagen.
Munk, K.J. (2003). Computable general equilibrium models and their use for transport policy analysis. Report 4, Danish Transport Research Institute
Sandmo, A. (1975). Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities. Swedish Journal of Economics, 77: 86–98.
Sandmo, A. (2000). Public economics and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Munk, K.J. (2008). Evaluation of the Introduction of Road Pricing Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model. In: Jensen-Butler, C., Sloth, B., Larsen, M.M., Madsen, B., Nielsen, O.A. (eds) Road Pricing, the Economy and the Environment. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77150-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77150-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77149-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77150-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)