Skip to main content

Conceptual Models for Search Engines

  • Chapter
Web Search

Part of the book series: Information Science and Knowledge Management ((ISKM,volume 14))

Summary

Search engines have entered popular culture. They touch people in diverse private and public settings and thus heighten the importance of such important social matters as information privacy and control, censorship, and equitable access. To fully benefit from search engines and to participate in debate about their merits, people necessarily appeal to their understandings for how they function. In this chapter we examine the conceptual understandings that people have of search engines by performing a content analysis on the sketches that 200 undergraduate and graduate students drew when asked to draw a sketch of how a search engine works. Analysis of the sketches reveals a diverse range of conceptual approaches, metaphors, representations, and misconceptions. On the whole, the conceptual models articulated by these students are simplistic. However, students with higher levels of academic achievement sketched more complete models. This research calls attention to the importance of improving students’ technical knowledge of how search engines work so they can be better equipped to develop and advocate policies for how search engines should be embedded in, and restricted from, various private and public information settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belew RK (2000) Finding out about: a cognitive perspective on search engine technology and the WWW. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin NJ, Oddy RN, Brooks HM (1982) ASK for information-retrieval: 1. background and theory. Journal of Documentation 38: 61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman CL (1985) The user’s mental model of an information retrieval system. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp 268–273, June 5–7). Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman CL (1986) The user’s mental model of an information retrieval system: an experiment on a prototype online catalog. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24: 47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman CL (1996) Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information-retrieval studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37: 387–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual search engine. Paper presented at the 7th International World Wide Web Conference. Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://wwwdb.stanford.edu/.backrub/google.html

  • Brown, DR (2001) SuperModeler: hugh dubberly. Gain: AIGA Journal of Design for the Network Economy, 1: 1–8. Retrieved, June 1, 2004, from http://gain1.aiga.org/pdf/profile.pdf

  • Cohen R (2002, December 15) Is googling okay? New York Times Magazine, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards B (2004, April 13) Morning edition: search engine wars, Part II. (Radio Broadcast). Seattle, National Public Radio, KUOW

    Google Scholar 

  • Efthimiadis EN (1990) Progress in documentation: online searching aids: a review of front-ends, gateways and other interfaces. Journal of Documentation 46: 218–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efthimiadis EN (2003–2007) The IR toolbox. Available at http://irtoolbox.ischool.washington.edu

  • Efthimiadis EN, Freier NG (2007) IR-Toolbox: an experiential learning tool for teaching IR. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 23–27, 2007. SIGIR’07, ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Efthimiadis EN, Hendry DG (2005) Search engines and how students think they work. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Salvador, Brazil, August 15–19, 2005). SIGIR ‘05. ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 595–596. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1076034.1076145

  • Fidel R, Davies RK, Douglas MH, Holder JK, Hopkins CJ, Kushner EJ, Miyagishima BK, Toney CD (1999) A visit to the information mall: web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of American Society for Information Science 50: 24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Giaccardi E, Ye Y, Sutcliffe AG, Mehandjiev N (2004) Meta-design: a manifesto for end-user development. Communications of the ACM 47: 33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr (2003) Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko JA and Sears A (eds), The human–computer interaction handbook (pp 1177–1201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman B, Howe D, and Felten E (2002) Informed consent in the Mozilla browser: implementing value sensitive design. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ‘02) Vol 8 (January 7–10, 2002). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from www.hicss.hawaii.edu/HICSS_35/HICSSpapers/PDFdocuments/OSPEI01.pdf

  • Gauch S, Smith J (1993) An expert system for automatic query reformulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 44: 124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D, Stevens AL (eds) (1983) Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick J (2004, March 21) Get out of my namespace. New York Times Magazine: 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene SL, Devlin SJ, Cannata PE, Gomez LM (1990) No IFs, ANDs, ORs: a study of database querying. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 32: 303–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen K (2003) Students’ conceptions of information retrieval: implications for the design of learning environments. Library and Information Science Research 25: 307–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen K, Jarvelin K (2005) Assessing learning outcomes in two information retrieval learning environments. Information Processing and Management 41: 949–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansell S (2003, December 8) Foes of bush enlist google in group prank. New York Times, p C.8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry DG (2006) Sketching with conceptual metaphors to explain computational processes. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages/Human-Centric Computing 2006, September 4–7, 2006, Brighton, UK (pp 95–102). IEEE Computer Society Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry DG, Efthimiadis EN (2004) Students’ mental models of information retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, ASIST’04, Providence, Rhode Island, November 13–18, 2004. 41: 580–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450410186

  • Hendry DG, Harper DJ (1997) An informal information-seeking environment. Journal of American Society of Information Science (Special Issue on Human–Computer Interaction) 48: 1036–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman D (2004, March 14) In searching we trust. New York Times, p 9.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland D, Quinn N (eds) (1987) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen P (1996) Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation 52: 3–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen BJ (2005) Seeking and implementing automated assistance during the search process. Information Processing and Management 41: 909–928

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton W (1987) Two theories of home heat control. In: D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds) Cultural models in language and thought (pp 223–242) Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenemann J, Belkin NJ (1996) A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground (pp 205–212). ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis J, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Fallows D (2004) Content creation online: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved 1 June 2004 from http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Content_Creation_Report.pdf

  • Liddy E (2001) How a search engine works. Searcher 9(5). (Also Retrieved 1 June 2004 from http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/may01/liddyhtm)

  • Lombard MJ, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28: 587–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke (2004, 1 June) Lucene Index Toolbox. Retrieved 1 June 2004 from http://www.getoptorg/luke/

  • McNichol T (2004, January 22) Your message here. New York Times, p G.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Media Metrix (2004) Press Release, RESTON, Va. March 19, 2004. Retrieved 1 June 2004 from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=443

  • Miller JD (1998) The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muramatsu J, Pratt W (2001) Transparent queries: investigating users’ mental models of search engines. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, LO

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi Y (2004, February 9) Online search engines help lift cover of privacy. Washington Post, p A01

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner D, Stevens A (eds) Mental models (pp 7–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes MP, Taylor MJ (1998) Automated assistance in the formulation of search statements for bibliographic databases. Information Processing and Management 34: 645–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne S (1991) A descriptive study of mental models. Behaviour & Information Technology. 10: 3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne S (2003) Users’ mental models: the very ideas. In: Carroll JM (ed) HCI models, theories, and frameworks (pp. 135–156). Morgan Kaufmann, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M, Lee S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science 11: 33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemo J (2004, January 28) Online auctions, misspelling in ads often spells cash. New York Times, p A1

    Google Scholar 

  • n H (1996) The Sciences of the artificial (3rd ed). MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Slone D (2002) The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during web interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(13):1152–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoerri A (1993) InfoCrystal: a visual tool for information retrieval & management. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp 11–20). New York: ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Topi H, Lucas W (2005) Mix and match: combining terms and operators for successful web searches. Information Processing and Management 41: 801–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totty M, Mangalindan M (2003, February 26) As google becomes web’s gatekeeper, sites fight to get in. Wall Street Journal, p A11.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurman RS (2001) Information anxiety 2. Que, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Young D, Shneiderman B (1993) A graphical filter/flow representation of boolean queries: a prototype implementation and evaluation. Journal of American Society for Information Science 44: 327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendry, D.G., Efthimiadis, E.N. (2008). Conceptual Models for Search Engines. In: Spink, A., Zimmer, M. (eds) Web Search. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75828-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75829-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics