Abstract
Cognitive agents use different strategies to identify relevant spatial information in communication. The chosen strategy depends on the agents’ conceptualization of the spatial situation at hand. This situation is determined by structural and functional aspects that are induced by the environment and the actions performed or intended therein. In this paper, we are interested in conceptualizations in the context of route directions. We focus on the meaning of prepositions used to characterize movements (actions) in spatially constrained systems such as street networks. We report on different strategies employed by people to disambiguate turning actions at intersections and demonstrate how these can be reflected in automatically generated route directions, again concentrating on the assignment of prepositions for anchoring movement. Including methods that focus on the most successful strategies people use in computational systems is a prerequisite for route directions that respect for human conceptualizations of spatial situations and that become, thus, cognitively ergonomic route directions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wahlster, W., Reithinger, N., Blocher, A.: SmartKom: Towards multimodal dialogues with anthropomorphic interface agents. In: Wolf, G., Klein, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Status Conference Human-Computer Interaction, DLR, Berlin, pp. 22–34 (2001)
Habel, C.: Representational commitment in maps. In: Duckham, M., Goodchild, M., Worboys, M. (eds.) Foundations of Geographic Information Science, Taylor and Francis, London (2003)
Retz-Schmidt, G.: Various views on spatial prepositions. AI Magazine 9(2), 95–105 (1988)
Regier, T.: The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996)
Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, seeing and acting. The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. In: Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C. (eds.) Essays in Cognitive Psychology Series, p. 201. Psychology Press, Hove, New York (2004)
Schweizer, K., Katz, S., Janzen, G.: Orientierung im Raum - kognitive Grundlagen und sprachliche Realisierung. Tourismus Journal 4(1), 79–104 (2000)
Tversky, B., Lee, P.U.: How space structures language. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1404, pp. 157–175. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Denis, M.: The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers Psychologie Cognitive 16(4), 409–458 (1997)
Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Habel, C.: Pictorial representations of routes: Chunking route segments during comprehension. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition III. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2685, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Dale, R., Geldof, S., Prost, J.P.: Using natural language generation in automatic route description. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 37(1), 89–105 (2005)
Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R.: Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 65–82. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Golledge, R.G.: Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior — Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, pp. 5–46. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)
Michon, P.E., Denis, M.: When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 400–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Klippel, A.: Wayfinding Choremes — Conceptualizing Wayfinding and Route Direction Elements. PhD thesis, Universität Bremen (2003)
Montello, D.R.: Navigation. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 257–294. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Klippel, A., Tenbrink, T., Montello, D.R.: The role of structure and function in conceptualization of directions (submitted)
Klippel, A., Hansen, S., Davies, J., Winter, S.: A high-level cognitive framework for route directions. In: Proceedings of the SSC 2005 Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis: The National Bienneal Conference of the Spatial Science Institute (2005)
Lakoff, G.: Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4), 458–508 (1973)
Vorwerg, C.: Raumrelationen in Wahrnehmung und Sprache. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden (2001)
Richter, K.F., Klippel, A.: A model for context-specific route directions. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds.) Spatial Cognition IV. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3343, pp. 58–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Hansen, S., Richter, K.F., Klippel, A.: Landmarks in OpenLS - a data structure for cognitive ergonomic route directions. In: Raubal, M., Miller, H.J., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2006. LNCS, vol. 4197, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Klippel, A., Winter, S.: Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Zwaan, R.A., Radvansky, G.A.: Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123(2), 162–185 (1998)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Speech Acts. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Daniel, M.P., Denis, M.: Spatial descriptions as navigational aids: A cognitive analysis of route directions. Kognitionswissenschaft 7, 45–52 (1998)
Tversky, B., Lee, P.U.: Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 51–64. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Richter, K.F., Klippel, A., Freksa, C.: Shortest, fastest, - but what next? A different approach to route directions. In: Raubal, M., Sliwinski, A., Kuhn, W. (eds.) Beiträge zu den Münsteraner GI-Tagen 2004, Münster, IfGIprints, pp. 205–217 (2004)
Schlieder, C.: Reasoning about ordering. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Elias, B.: Extracting landmarks with data mining methods. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Klippel, A., Richter, K.F., Hansen, S.: Structural salience as a landmark. In: Workshop Mobile Maps 2005, Salzburg, Austria (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Richter, KF., Klippel, A. (2007). Before or After: Prepositions in Spatially Constrained Systems. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4387. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75665-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75666-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)