Skip to main content

Before or After: Prepositions in Spatially Constrained Systems

  • Conference paper
Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction (Spatial Cognition 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4387))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Cognitive agents use different strategies to identify relevant spatial information in communication. The chosen strategy depends on the agents’ conceptualization of the spatial situation at hand. This situation is determined by structural and functional aspects that are induced by the environment and the actions performed or intended therein. In this paper, we are interested in conceptualizations in the context of route directions. We focus on the meaning of prepositions used to characterize movements (actions) in spatially constrained systems such as street networks. We report on different strategies employed by people to disambiguate turning actions at intersections and demonstrate how these can be reflected in automatically generated route directions, again concentrating on the assignment of prepositions for anchoring movement. Including methods that focus on the most successful strategies people use in computational systems is a prerequisite for route directions that respect for human conceptualizations of spatial situations and that become, thus, cognitively ergonomic route directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wahlster, W., Reithinger, N., Blocher, A.: SmartKom: Towards multimodal dialogues with anthropomorphic interface agents. In: Wolf, G., Klein, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Status Conference Human-Computer Interaction, DLR, Berlin, pp. 22–34 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Habel, C.: Representational commitment in maps. In: Duckham, M., Goodchild, M., Worboys, M. (eds.) Foundations of Geographic Information Science, Taylor and Francis, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Retz-Schmidt, G.: Various views on spatial prepositions. AI Magazine 9(2), 95–105 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Regier, T.: The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, seeing and acting. The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. In: Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C. (eds.) Essays in Cognitive Psychology Series, p. 201. Psychology Press, Hove, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schweizer, K., Katz, S., Janzen, G.: Orientierung im Raum - kognitive Grundlagen und sprachliche Realisierung. Tourismus Journal 4(1), 79–104 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tversky, B., Lee, P.U.: How space structures language. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1404, pp. 157–175. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Denis, M.: The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers Psychologie Cognitive 16(4), 409–458 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Habel, C.: Pictorial representations of routes: Chunking route segments during comprehension. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition III. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2685, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dale, R., Geldof, S., Prost, J.P.: Using natural language generation in automatic route description. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 37(1), 89–105 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R.: Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 65–82. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Golledge, R.G.: Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior — Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, pp. 5–46. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michon, P.E., Denis, M.: When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 400–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klippel, A.: Wayfinding Choremes — Conceptualizing Wayfinding and Route Direction Elements. PhD thesis, Universität Bremen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Montello, D.R.: Navigation. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 257–294. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Klippel, A., Tenbrink, T., Montello, D.R.: The role of structure and function in conceptualization of directions (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klippel, A., Hansen, S., Davies, J., Winter, S.: A high-level cognitive framework for route directions. In: Proceedings of the SSC 2005 Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis: The National Bienneal Conference of the Spatial Science Institute (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lakoff, G.: Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4), 458–508 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Vorwerg, C.: Raumrelationen in Wahrnehmung und Sprache. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richter, K.F., Klippel, A.: A model for context-specific route directions. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds.) Spatial Cognition IV. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3343, pp. 58–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen, S., Richter, K.F., Klippel, A.: Landmarks in OpenLS - a data structure for cognitive ergonomic route directions. In: Raubal, M., Miller, H.J., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2006. LNCS, vol. 4197, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Klippel, A., Winter, S.: Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zwaan, R.A., Radvansky, G.A.: Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123(2), 162–185 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Speech Acts. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Daniel, M.P., Denis, M.: Spatial descriptions as navigational aids: A cognitive analysis of route directions. Kognitionswissenschaft 7, 45–52 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tversky, B., Lee, P.U.: Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 51–64. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richter, K.F., Klippel, A., Freksa, C.: Shortest, fastest, - but what next? A different approach to route directions. In: Raubal, M., Sliwinski, A., Kuhn, W. (eds.) Beiträge zu den Münsteraner GI-Tagen 2004, Münster, IfGIprints, pp. 205–217 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schlieder, C.: Reasoning about ordering. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Elias, B.: Extracting landmarks with data mining methods. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Klippel, A., Richter, K.F., Hansen, S.: Structural salience as a landmark. In: Workshop Mobile Maps 2005, Salzburg, Austria (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richter, KF., Klippel, A. (2007). Before or After: Prepositions in Spatially Constrained Systems. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4387. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75665-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75666-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics