Skip to main content

Augmenting Traditional Conceptual Models to Accommodate XML Structural Constructs

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling - ER 2007 (ER 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4801))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Current graphical notations for XML Schema do not raise the level of abstraction for XML schemata in the same way traditional conceptual models raise the level of abstraction for data schemata. Traditional conceptual models, on the other hand, do not accommodate several XML Schema structures. Thus, there is a need to enrich traditional conceptual models with new XML Schema features. After establishing criteria for XML conceptual modeling, we propose an enrichment to represent the XML features missing in traditional models. We argue that our solution can be adapted generally for traditional conceptual models and show how it can be adapted for two popular conceptual models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AL-Kamha, R.: Translating XML Schema to Conceptual XML. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Brigham Young University (November 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. AL-Kamha, R.: Translating Conceptual XML to XML Schema. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Brigham Young University (in progress)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Conrad, R., Scheffner, D., Freytag, J.C.: XML conceptual modeling using UML. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1920, pp. 558–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Embley, D.W., Kurtz, B.D., Woodfield, S.N.: Object-oriented Systems Analysis: A Model-Driven Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A Formal Semantics for UML Workshop (October 2006), http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~stl/internal/uml2/MoDELS2006/

  8. Goldstein, R.C., Storey, V.C.: Some findings on the intuitiveness of entity-relationship constructs. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach (ER 1989),Toronto, Canada, pp. 9–23, North-Holland (October 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liddle, S.W., Embley, D.W., Woodfield, S.N.: Cardinality constraints in semantic data models. Data & Knowledge Engineering 11(3), 235–270 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Necasky, M.: Conceptual modeling for XML: A survey. In: Proceedings of the DATESO 2006 Annual International Workshop on Databases, Texts, Specifications and Objects (DATESO 2006), Desna, Czech Republic, pp. 40–53 (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Visual Studio.NET, Microsoft. http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio

  12. Sengupta, A., Mohan, S.: Formal and Conceptual Models for XML Structures—The Past, Present, and Future. Technical Report 137–1, Indiana University, Information Systems Department, Bloomington, Indiana (April 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sengupta, A., Mohan, S., Doshi, R.: XER — extensible entity relationship modeling. In: Proceedings of XML 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (December 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sengupta, A., Wilde, E.: The Case for Conceptual Modeling for XML. Technical Report No. 242, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich (February 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. XMLSpy, Altova, http://www.xmlspy.com

  16. Stylus Studio, http://www.stylusstudio.com/xml_schema_editor.html

  17. Teorey, T.J., Yang, D., Fry, J.P.: A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model. ACM Computing Surveys 18(2), 197–222 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. UML 2.0 superstructure specification (August 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilde, E.: Towards conceptual modeling for XML. In: Proceedings of the Berliner XML Tage 2005 (BXML2005), Berlin, Germany, pp. 213–224 (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christine Parent Klaus-Dieter Schewe Veda C. Storey Bernhard Thalheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Al-Kamha, R., Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W. (2007). Augmenting Traditional Conceptual Models to Accommodate XML Structural Constructs. In: Parent, C., Schewe, KD., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2007. ER 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4801. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75563-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75563-0_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75562-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75563-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics