Abstract
Current graphical notations for XML Schema do not raise the level of abstraction for XML schemata in the same way traditional conceptual models raise the level of abstraction for data schemata. Traditional conceptual models, on the other hand, do not accommodate several XML Schema structures. Thus, there is a need to enrich traditional conceptual models with new XML Schema features. After establishing criteria for XML conceptual modeling, we propose an enrichment to represent the XML features missing in traditional models. We argue that our solution can be adapted generally for traditional conceptual models and show how it can be adapted for two popular conceptual models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AL-Kamha, R.: Translating XML Schema to Conceptual XML. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Brigham Young University (November 2006)
AL-Kamha, R.: Translating Conceptual XML to XML Schema. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Brigham Young University (in progress)
Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (1999)
Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)
Conrad, R., Scheffner, D., Freytag, J.C.: XML conceptual modeling using UML. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1920, pp. 558–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Embley, D.W., Kurtz, B.D., Woodfield, S.N.: Object-oriented Systems Analysis: A Model-Driven Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1992)
A Formal Semantics for UML Workshop (October 2006), http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~stl/internal/uml2/MoDELS2006/
Goldstein, R.C., Storey, V.C.: Some findings on the intuitiveness of entity-relationship constructs. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach (ER 1989),Toronto, Canada, pp. 9–23, North-Holland (October 1989)
Liddle, S.W., Embley, D.W., Woodfield, S.N.: Cardinality constraints in semantic data models. Data & Knowledge Engineering 11(3), 235–270 (1993)
Necasky, M.: Conceptual modeling for XML: A survey. In: Proceedings of the DATESO 2006 Annual International Workshop on Databases, Texts, Specifications and Objects (DATESO 2006), Desna, Czech Republic, pp. 40–53 (April 2006)
Visual Studio.NET, Microsoft. http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio
Sengupta, A., Mohan, S.: Formal and Conceptual Models for XML Structures—The Past, Present, and Future. Technical Report 137–1, Indiana University, Information Systems Department, Bloomington, Indiana (April 2003)
Sengupta, A., Mohan, S., Doshi, R.: XER — extensible entity relationship modeling. In: Proceedings of XML 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (December 2003)
Sengupta, A., Wilde, E.: The Case for Conceptual Modeling for XML. Technical Report No. 242, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich (February 2006)
XMLSpy, Altova, http://www.xmlspy.com
Stylus Studio, http://www.stylusstudio.com/xml_schema_editor.html
Teorey, T.J., Yang, D., Fry, J.P.: A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model. ACM Computing Surveys 18(2), 197–222 (1986)
UML 2.0 superstructure specification (August 2005)
Wilde, E.: Towards conceptual modeling for XML. In: Proceedings of the Berliner XML Tage 2005 (BXML2005), Berlin, Germany, pp. 213–224 (September 2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Al-Kamha, R., Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W. (2007). Augmenting Traditional Conceptual Models to Accommodate XML Structural Constructs. In: Parent, C., Schewe, KD., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2007. ER 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4801. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75563-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75563-0_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75562-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75563-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)