Skip to main content

Using Ontologies to Search Learning Resources

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2007 (ICCSA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4705))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Even if the keyword-based search played an important role in finding the learning resources, it cannot satisfy users’ needs because of lack of the semantics of learning resources. This paper used two kinds of ontologies, core and domain, to search learning resources relevant to given users’ query. The general semantics of learning resources are represented by the core ontology, constructed from the metadata of learning resources. In our prototype, we built the domain ontology about middle school Mathematics with help of domain experts. And our system used the OWL-DL and SWRL to represent ontologies, and the reasoning engine, KAON2 and BOSSAM to handle these ontologies. This system will be used by the EDUNET - the largest nationwide service of sharing learning resources, that is operated by KERIS for students and instructors throughout Korea. Our performance results show that the proposed mechanism is better than the keyword-based mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. EDUNET. http://edunet4u.net

  2. KERIS(Korea Education & Research Information Service), http://www.keris.or.kr

  3. Shon, J.-G., Cho, Y.-S., Chung, K.-S.: Research on Metadata(KEM v3.0) for Higher Educational Information and Digital Rights Management. Research Report KR-2005-27, KERIS (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgins, W., et al.: Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. IEEE 1484.12.1-2002 (2002), http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

  5. Nilsson, M., Palmer, M., Naeve, A.: A Sematic Web Meta-data for e-learning – some Architectural Guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Wide Web Conference(WWW2002), Hawaii, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antonious, G., van Harmelen, F.: A semantic web primer. The MIT Press, Cambridge ch. 1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taibi, D., Gentile, M., Seta, L., Semantic, A.: Search Engine for Learning Resources. In: Proceedings of the Third International conference on Multimedai and Information and Communication Technologies in Education, m-ICTE2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kindle, C.: Ontology-supported Information Retrieval. In: Proceedings of EUROCON 2005 (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reasoning in Description Logics with a Concrete Domain in the Framework of Resolution. In: Proc. of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI, Valencia, Spain, August, 2004, pp. 353–357 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jang, M.: Bossam: an extended rule engine for the web. In: Antoniou, G., Boley, H. (eds.) RuleML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3323, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lassila, O., Swick, R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) model and syntax specification (1999), http://www.w3c.org/TR/,/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/

  12. Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., Brase, J.: The LOM RDF Binding - Principles and Implementation. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual ARIADNE conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, http://dublincore.org/

  14. Cha, J., Cho, Y.-S., Choe, H., Choi, Y.-S, Moon, N.: Research on Enchancing the Education Resource management with ontology. Research Report KR-2006-xx, KERIS (December 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: Racer: An OWL Reasoning Agent for the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applications, Products and Services of Web-based Support Systems, in conjunction with the 2003 IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence, Ê Halifax, Canada, October 13, pp. 91–95. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A tableaux decision procedure for SHOIQ. In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pp. 448–453 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Protee- (2000), http://protege.stanford.edu

  18. SPARQL, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  19. SWRL. http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/

  20. Firefox, http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Osvaldo Gervasi Marina L. Gavrilova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chang, B., Ham, Dh., Moon, Ds., Choi, Y.S., Cha, J. (2007). Using Ontologies to Search Learning Resources. In: Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2007. ICCSA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4705. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74472-6_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74472-6_95

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74468-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74472-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics