Abstract
Most information about the external world comes from our visual brain. However, it is not clear how this information is processed. We will analyze brain responses using machine learning methods based on rough set theory. We will test the expertise of the visual area V4, which is responsible for shape classifications. Characteristic of each stimulus are treated as a set of learning attributes. We assume that bottom-up information is related to hypotheses, while top-down information is related to predictions. Therefore, neuronal responses are divided into three categories. Category 0 occurs if cell response is below 20 spikes/s (sp/s), indicating that the hypothesis is not valid. Category 1 occurs if cell activity is higher than 20 spikes, implying the hypothesis is valid. Category 2 occurs if cell response is above 40 sp/s; in this case we conclude that the hypothesis and prediction are valid. By using experimental data we make a decision table for each cell, and generate equivalence classes. We express the brains basic concepts by means of the learners basic categories. By approximating stimulus categories with concepts of different cells we determine core properties of cells, and differences between them. On this basis we have created profiles of their receptive field properties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets - Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, London, Dordrecht (1991)
Pollen, D.A., Przybyszewski, A.W., Rubin, M.A., Foote, W.: Spatial receptive field organization of macaque V4 neurons. Cereb Cortex 12, 601–616 (2002)
Mazer, J.A., Gallant, J.L.: Goal-related activity in V4 during free viewing visual search. Evidence for a ventral stream visual salience map. Neuron. 40, 1241–1250 (2003)
Przybyszewski, A.W., Gaska, J.P., Foote, W., Pollen, D.A.: Striate cortex increases contrast gain of macaque LGN neurons. Vis Neurosci. 17, 485–494 (2000)
Przybyszewski, A.W., Kon, M.A.: Synchronization-based model of the visual system supports recognition. In: Program No. 718.11. 2003 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner, Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC (2003)
David, S.V., Hayden, B.Y., Gallant, J.: Spectral receptive field properties explain shape selectivity in area V4. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 3492–3505 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Przybyszewski, A.W. (2007). Checking Brain Expertise Using Rough Set Theory. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Peters, J.F., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A. (eds) Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms. RSEISP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4585. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73451-2_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73451-2_78
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73450-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73451-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)