Skip to main content

Ready Simulation for Concurrency: It’s Logical!

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4596))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper provides new insight into the connection between the trace-based lower part of van Glabbeek’s linear-time, branching-time spectrum and its simulation-based upper part. We establish that ready simulation is fully abstract with respect to failures inclusion, when adding the conjunction operator that was proposed by the authors in [TCS 373(1–2):19–40] to the standard setting of labelled transition systems with (CSP-style) parallel composition. More precisely, we actually prove a stronger result by considering a coarser relation than failures inclusion, namely a preorder that relates processes with respect to inconsistencies that may arise under conjunctive composition. Ready simulation is also shown to satisfy standard logic properties and thus commends itself for studying mixed operational and logic languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, M., Plotkin, G.D.: A logical view of composition. TCS 114(1), 3–30 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstra, J.A., Ponse, A., Smolka, S.A.: Handbook of Process Algebra. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom, B., Istrail, S., Meyer, A.R.: Bisimulation can’t be traced. J. ACM 42(1), 232–268 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and modal logic. In: Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 995–1072. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Glabbeek, R.: The linear time – branching time spectrum II (1993), available at http://theory.stanford.edu/~rvg/abstracts.html#26

  6. van Glabbeek, R.: The linear time – branching time spectrum I. In: Handbook of Process Algebra, ch. 1, pp. 3–99. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Graf, S., Sifakis, J.: A logic for the description of non-deterministic programs and their properties. Inform. & Control 68(1–3), 254–270 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurshan, R.P.: Computer-Aided Verification of Coordinating Processes: The Automata-Theoretic Approach. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lamport, L.: The temporal logic of actions. TOPLAS 16(3), 872–923 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lüttgen, G., Vogler, W.: Conjunction on processes: Full-abstraction via ready-tree semantics. TCS 373(1–2), 19–40 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lüttgen, G., Vogler, W.: Ready simulation for concurrency: It’s logical! Techn. rep. 2007-4, Inst. f. Informatik, Univ. Augsburg (2007), http://www.informatik.uni-augsburg.de/forschung/reports/

  13. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Olderog, E.-R.: Nets, Terms and Formulas. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 23. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Olderog, E.-R., Hoare, C.A.R.: Specification-oriented semantics for communicating processes. Acta Informatica 23(1), 9–66 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Steen, M., Derrick, J., Boiten, E., Bowman, H.: Consistency of partial process specifications. In: Haeberer, A.M. (ed.) AMAST 1998. LNCS, vol. 1548, pp. 248–262. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Veglioni, S., De Nicola, R.: Possible worlds for process algebras. In: Sangiorgi, D., de Simone, R. (eds.) CONCUR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1466, pp. 179–193. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Lars Arge Christian Cachin Tomasz Jurdziński Andrzej Tarlecki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lüttgen, G., Vogler, W. (2007). Ready Simulation for Concurrency: It’s Logical!. In: Arge, L., Cachin, C., Jurdziński, T., Tarlecki, A. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4596. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73419-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73420-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics