Skip to main content

Toward a Large Scale E-Market: A Greedy and Local Search Based Winner Determination

  • Conference paper
New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4570))

Abstract

Combinatorial auction is one of the most popular market mechanisms and it has a huge effect on electronic markets and political strategies. On large scale e-markets, we need a good approximation algorithm for winner determination that is robust for changing the distribution and the number of bids in an auction. We proposed approximate algorithms for combinatorial auctions with massively large number of (more than 100,000) bids. In this paper, we show the robustness of our winner determination algorithms for combinatorial auctions with large number of bids. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed algorithms are robust on changing the distribution and the number of bids in an auction. Finally, we shortly describe a theoretical limitation about our algorithms that concerns with giving truthfulness of the auction mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sandholm, T., Suri, S., Gilpin, A., Levine, D.: Cabob: A fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Management Science 51(3), 374–390 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McMillan, J.: Selling spectrum rights. The Journal of Economic Perspectives (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein, R., Henriquez, L., Catalan, J., Weintraub, G.Y., Martinez, C., Espejo, F.: A combinatorial auction improves school meals in chile: A case of or in developing counteries. International Transactions in Operational Research 11, 593–612 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., Steinberg, R.: Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y.: Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approarches. In: Proc. of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI99), pp. 548–553 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lehmann, D., O’Callaghan, L.I., Shoham, Y.: Truth revelation in rapid, approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. Journal of the ACM 49, 577–602 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zurel, E., Nisan, N.: An efficient approximate allocation algorithm for combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of the Third ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2001), pp. 125–136. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukuta, N., Ito, T.: Towards better approximation of winner determination for combinatorial auctions with large number of bids. In: Proc. of The 2006, WIC/IEEE/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology(IAT2006), pp. 618–621 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Vries, S., Vohra, R.V.: Combinatorial auctions: A survey. International Transactions in Operational Research 15(3), 284–309 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leyton-Brown, K., Pearson, M., Shoham, Y.: Towards a universal test suite for combinatorial auction algorithms. In: Proc. of EC 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dobzinski, S., Schapira, M.: An improved approximation algorithm for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In: SODA ’06: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm, pp. 1064–1073. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lavi, R., Swamy, C.: Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming. In: 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’05), pp. 595–604 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoos, H.H., Boutilier, C.: Solving combinatorial auctions using stochastic local search. In: Proc. of the AAAI2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guo, Y., Lim, A., Rodrigues, B., Zhu, Y.: A non-exact approach and experiment studies on the combinatorial auction problem. In: Proc. of HICSS2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hiroshi G. Okuno Moonis Ali

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fukuta, N., Ito, T. (2007). Toward a Large Scale E-Market: A Greedy and Local Search Based Winner Determination. In: Okuno, H.G., Ali, M. (eds) New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4570. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73325-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73325-6_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73322-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73325-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics