Skip to main content

Introduced Lagomorphs as a Threat to “Native” Lagomorphs: The Case of the Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Northern Italy

  • Chapter
Lagomorph Biology

Eastern cottontails were introduced in Pinerolo (southwest of Torino), Italy, near the Pellice River, in 1966 (Spagnesi 2002). By the 1980s, the population expanded into the region of Piemonte with localized groups in the province of Alessandria (Prigioni et al. 1992), reaching 25–27 cottontails/km2 in the late 1990s, and the percentage of cottontails in the total of all mammals killed on roads rose from 2.2% in 1995 to 6.0% in 1997 (Silvano et al. 2000). At the end of the 1990s, the species was present in the western part of Lombardia and in some localities in the south side of the Po River (Fig. 1). Presently, Eastern cottontails are also present in the regions of Veneto, Emilia Romagna, Marche, and Toscana in response to population growth and additional releases to increase the potential for small game harvesting. Meriggi (2001) observed that in release sites, cottontails preferred the successional and weedy vegetation with dense brushy cover along rivers where they can find cover from predators. He also speculated that cottontails might compete with native Lagomorphs (European hare, Lepus europaeus, and European rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus), especially in poor habitats, limiting their population size to a low level. A prerequisite of competition would be that Eastern cottontails have similar habitat requirements as other native Lagomorphs. In this chapter, we analysed the potential competition between Eastern cottontails, European hares and European rabbits by investigating the habitat requirements of Eastern cottontails in two areas of northern Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bruna JF (1952) Kentucky rabbit investigations. Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resource, Pittman-Robertson Proj. No 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvete C, Estrada R, Angulo E, Cabezas-Ruiz S (2004) Habitat factors related to wild rabbit conservation in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecol 19:531–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho JC, Gomes P (2004) Influence of herbaceous cover, shelter and land cover structure on wild rabbit abundance in NW Portugal. Acta Theriol 49:63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JA, Harman AL, Samuel DE (1977) Reproductive and physiological cycles in cottontail complex in western Maryland and nearby West Virginia. Wildl Monogr 56:1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis JL, Forgeard F, Didillon MC (1985) Etude de Sylvilagus floridanus en région méditerranéenne dans des conditions de semi-liberté. Régime alimentaire au cours d'un cycle annuel par l'analyse micrographique des fèces. Gibier Faune Sauvage 2:59–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PM (1993) The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 290–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards WR, Havera SP, Labisky RF, Ellis JA, Werner RE (1981) The abundance of cottontails in relation to agricultural land use in Illinois (U.S.A.) 1956–1978, with comments on mechanism of regulation. In: Myers K, MacInnes CD (eds) Proceedings of the world lagomorph conference. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, pp 761–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1972) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friley CE Jr (1955) A study of cottontail habitat preferences on a southern Michigan farming area. University of Michigan, Department of Conservation (Pittman-Robertson Proj. No. 48).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazier DS, Ecket SE (2002) Competitive ability, body size and geographical range size in small mammals. J Biogeogr 29:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RH (1974) Multivariate niche analysis with temporally varying environmental factors. Ecology 55:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon MS, Bartholomew GA, Grinnell AD, Jorgenson CB, White FN (1968) Animal function: principles and adaptations. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried BM (1979) Small mammal populations in woodlot islands. Am Midl Nat 102:105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen K (1992) Reproduction in European hare in a Danish farmland. Acta Theriol 37:27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesterberg T, Moore DS, Monaghan S, Clipson A, Epstein R (2005) Bootstrap methods and permutation test. In: Moore DS, McCabe GP (eds) Introduction to the practice of statistics, 5th edn. WH Freeman, New York, pp 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurements of food selection. Oecologia 14:413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE, South AB, Walls SS (2003) Ranges 6 V.1.204: for the analysis of tracking and location data. Anatrack LTQ, Wareham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavazza A, Tizziani P, Cappucci L, Meneguz PG (2001) Problematiche sanitarie legate alla presenza della Minilepre. Osservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale della Lombardia 4: http://www.oevr.org/static/ArticoliOsservatorio/2001–5/f_sommario5_01.htm

  • Linder RL, Hendrickson GO (1956) Use of rearing cover by Mearns cottontail. Proc Iowa Acad Sci 63:732–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi L, Fernandez N, Moreno S, Villafuerte R (2003) Habitat-related differences in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) abundance, distribution, and activity. J Mamm 84:26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL (1993) Resource selection by animals. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A (2001) Sylvilagus floridanus (Allen JA 1890), Silvilago, Minilepre. In: Prigioni C, Cantini M, Zilio A (eds) Atlante dei mammiferi della Lombardia. Regione Lombardia & Università degli Studi di Pavia, Milano, pp 144–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Alieri R (1989) Factors affecting brown hares density in northern Italy. Ethol Ecol Evol 1:255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Verri A (1990) Population dynamics and habitat selection of European hare on poplar monocultures in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 35:69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Ferloni M, Geremia R (2001) Studio sul successo dei ripopolamenti di Lepre. Greentime, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Gariboldi A, Magnani B (1992) Habitat requirements of the bobwhite quail in northern Italy. Boll Zool 59:73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noon BR (1981) The distribution of an avian guild along a temperate elevational gradient: the importance and expression of competition. Ecol Monogr 51:105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1981) Competition and niche theory. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology. Principles and applications. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigioni C, Spanò S, Malacarne G (1992) Piano faunistico provinciale. Assessorato Ambiente Provincia, Provincia di Alessandria, pp 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert BL, Litvaitis JA (1996) Behavioural interactions between invading and endemic lagomorphs: implications for conserving a declining species. Biol Conserv 76:289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvano F, Acquarone C, Cucco M (2000) Distribution of the eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus in the province of Alessandria. Hystrix 11:75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RK, Jennings NV, Harris S (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mamm Rev 35:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spagnesi M (2002) Silvilago Sylvilagus floridanus. In: Spegnesi M, De Marinis AM (eds) Mammiferi d'Italia. Quaderni di Conservazione della Natura, No. 14, Ministero Ambiente-Istituto Nazionale Fauna Selvatica, Bologna, pp 156–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Yahner RH (1984) Winter use of insular habitat patches by eastern cottontail. Acta Theriol 29:45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance RD (1976) Changes in land use and wildlife populations in south-eastern Illinois. Wildl Soc Bull 4:11–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosin, A.V., Gilio, N., Meriggi, A. (2008). Introduced Lagomorphs as a Threat to “Native” Lagomorphs: The Case of the Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Northern Italy. In: Alves, P.C., Ferrand, N., Hackländer, K. (eds) Lagomorph Biology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72446-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics