Skip to main content

Integration of Remote Sensing Techniques in Different Stages of Landslide Response

  • Chapter
Progress in Landslide Science

Abstract

Recent advances in remote sensing techniques have yielded numerous new applications which provide benefits for all stages of landslide management. This paper describes how the data produced from different types of sensors and platforms have been used to estimate, model and mitigate landslide risk in sites in Italy and in other parts of the world. EO data have been utilized to update landslide inventories, with the identification of new landslides and the ratification or modification of landslide boundaries and states of activity, and to improve landslide hazard and risk assessment procedures at regional scales. Radar data provided a global topographic dataset that was used to model lahar inundation hazard while an example of the millimetric resolutions attainable from repeat-pass satellite radar data, with its beneficial implications for landslide monitoring, is also illustrated. Ground-based systems are shown to be innovative early warning systems for slow-moving landslides while coupled techniques involving both optical and radar images can provide support for the management of emergencies. The illustration of these case histories demonstrates the increasing importance of remote sensing in all facets of landslide management, with significant advantages for both policy makers and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antonello G, Casagli N, Farina P, Leva D, Nico G, Sieber AJ, Tarchi D (2004) Ground-based SAR interferometry for monitoring mass movements. Landslides 1(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamler R (1999) The SRTM Mission: A World-wide 30 m Resolution DEM from SAR interferometry in 11 days. Photogrammetric Week 1999:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardino P, Costantini M, Franceschetti G, Iodice A, Pietranera L, Rizzo V (2003) Use of differential SAR interferometry in monitorino and modelling large slope instability at Maratea (Basilicata, Italy). Eng Geol 68(1–2):31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. Pergamon, Ottawa, 198 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Casagli N, Guerri L, Righini G, Ferretti A, Colombo D, Prati C (2005) Integrated use of PS and very high resolution optical images for supporting landslide risk management. In: URSI, Commission F (ed) Symposium on Microwave Remote Sensing of the Earth, Oceans, Ice and Athmosphere, 20–21 April 2005, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005a) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River Basin. Landslides 2(4):329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Farina P, Moretti S, Nico G, Strozzi T (2005b) On the application of SAR interferometry to geomorphological studies: estimation of landform attributes and mass movements. Geomorphology 66:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG, van Western CJ (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information system in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 107–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo D, Farina P, Gontier E, Fumagalli A, Moretti S (2003) Integration of Permanent Scatterers analysis and high resolution optical images within landslide risk analysis. In: Proceedings of FRINGE 2003 Workshop, Advances in SAR interferometry from ERS and ENVISAT missions, ESA-ESRIN, Frascati, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsina A, Farina P, Antonello G, Barbieri M., Casagli N, Coren F, Guerri L, Ronchetti F, Sterzai P, Tarchi D (2006) Space-borne and ground-based SAR interferometry as tools for landslide hazard management in civil protection. Int J Rem Sens 27(12):2351–2369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier MJ (1984) Field assessment of slope instability. In: Brundsen D, Prior D (eds) Slope instability. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 103–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Duren R, Wong E, Breckenridge B, Shaffer S, Duncan C, Tubbs E, Salomon P (1998) Metrology, attitude, and orbit determination for spaceborne interferometric synthetic Aperture Radar, in SPIE AeroSense Conference on Acquisition, Tracking and Pointing XII, Orlando, Florida, pp 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falorni G, Teles V, Vivoni ER, Bras RL, Amaratunga K (2005) Analysis and characterization of the vertical accuracy of digital elevation models from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. J Geophys Res-Earth Surface 110(F2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina P, Colombo D, Fumagalli A, Marks F, Moretti S (2006) Remote Sensing techniques for landslide risk analysis: outcomes from the ESA-SLAM project. Eng Geol 88:200–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F (2001) Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE T Geosci Remote 39(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuzono T (1985) A new method for predicting the failure time of a slope. In: Proceedings of IVth International Conference and Field Workshop on Landslides, Tokyo, 23–31 August, Japan Landslide Society, 1, pp 145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall O, Falorni G, Bras RL (2005) Characterization and quantification of data voids in Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data. IEEE Geosci Remote Lett 2(2):177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretsch JL (2000) Shuttle radar topography mission overview. Applied imagery pattern recognition workshop, Washington, D.C., IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagmay AMF, Valdivia W (2006) Regional stress influence on the opening direction of crater amphitheaters in Southeast Asian volcanoes. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 158(1–2):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouginis-Mark PJ, Rowland SK, Garbeil H, Amelung F (2001) Topographic change on volcanoes from SRTM and other interferometric radars. 757 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation an mitigation. Sp. Rep. 247, Transportation Research Board, National research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 129–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Strozzi T, Farina P, Corsini A, Ambrosi C, Thuring M, Zilger J, Wiesmann A, Wegmüller U, Werner C (2005) Survey and monitoring of landslide displacements by means of L-band satellite SAR interferometry. Landslides. Journal of International Consortium on Landslides 2(3):193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarchi D, Casagli N, Fanti R, Leva D, Luzi G, Pasuto A, Pieraccini M, Silvano S (2003a) Landslide monitoring by using ground-based SAR interferometry: an example of application to the Tessina landslide in Italy. Eng Geol 68:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarchi D, Casagli N, Leva D, Moretti S, Sieber AJ (2003b) Monitoring landslide displacements by using ground-based SAR interferometry: application to the Ruinon landslide in the Italian Alps. J Geophys Res 108:2387–2401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zyl JJ (2001) The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): a breakthrough in remote sensing of topography. Acta Astronautica 48(5–12):559–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ, IAEG Commission on Landslides (1984) Landslide hazard zonation-a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF (1984) Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. IAEG Bull 21(3):337–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Canuti, P., Casagli, N., Catani, F., Falorni, G., Farina, P. (2007). Integration of Remote Sensing Techniques in Different Stages of Landslide Response. In: Sassa, K., Fukuoka, H., Wang, F., Wang, G. (eds) Progress in Landslide Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70965-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics