Skip to main content

Impossibility of a Quantum Speed-Up with a Faulty Oracle

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5125))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider Grover’s unstructured search problem in the setting where each oracle call has some small probability of failing. We show that no quantum speed-up is possible in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Grover, L.K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pp. 212–219 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, C.H., Bernstein, E., Brassard, G., Vazirani, U.: Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM J. Comput. 26(5), 1510–1523 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer, M., Brassard, G., Høyer, P., Tapp, A.: Tight bounds on quantum searching. Fortschritte der Physik 46, 493–505 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ambainis, A.: Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, New York, pp. 636–643 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambainis, A.: Quantum search algorithms. SIGACT News 35(2), 22–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrow, A.: Personal communication (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shenvi, N., Brown, K.R., Whaley, K.B.: Effects of a random noisy oracle on search algorithm complexity. Phys. Rev. A 68(5), 052313 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Zurek, W.H.: Resilient quantum computation. Science 279(5349), 342–345 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Long, G.L., Li, Y.S., Zhang, W.L., Tu, C.C.: Dominant gate imperfection in Grover’s quantum search algorithm. Physical Review A 61, 042305 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapira, D., Mozes, S., Biham, O.: Effect of unitary noise on Grover’s quantum search algorithm. Phys. Rev. A 67(4), 42301 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brassard, G., Høyer, P., Mosca, M., Tapp, A.: Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. In: Quantum computation and information. Contemp. Math, vol. 305, pp. 53–74. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Høyer, P., Mosca, M., de Wolf, R.: Quantum search on bounded-error inputs. In: Proceedings of ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 291–299. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buhrman, H., Newman, I., Röhrig, H., de Wolf, R.: Robust polynomials and quantum algorithms. Theory Comput. Syst. 40(4), 379–395 (2007); Preliminary version in STACS 2005

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwama, K., Raymond, R., Yamashita, S.: General bounds for quantum biased oracles. IPSJ Journal 46(10), 1234–1243 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki, T., Yamashita, S., Nakanishi, M., Watanabe, K.: Robust quantum algorithms with ε-biased oracles. In: Chen, D.Z., Lee, D.T. (eds.) COCOON 2006. LNCS, vol. 4112, pp. 116–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Magniez, F., Nayak, A., Roland, J., Santha, M.: Search via quantum walk. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, New York, pp. 575–584 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Høyer, P., Lee, T., Špalek, R.: Negative weights make adversaries stronger. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pp. 526–535 (2007) quant-ph/0611054

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beals, R., Buhrman, H., Cleve, R., Mosca, M., de Wolf, R.: Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. J. ACM 48(4), 778–797 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaye, P., Laflamme, R., Mosca, M.: An introduction to quantum computing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Regev, O., Schiff, L. (2008). Impossibility of a Quantum Speed-Up with a Faulty Oracle. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5125. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70575-8_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70575-8_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70574-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70575-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics