Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Methods to Develop Breast Models for Simulation of Breast Tomosynthesis and CT

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5116))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dedicated x-ray computed tomography (CT) of the breast using a cone-beam flat-panel detector system is a modality under investigation by a number of research teams. Several teams, including ours, have fabricated prototype, bench-top flat-panel CT breast imaging (CTBI) systems. We also use computer simulation software to optimize system parameters. We are developing a methodology to use high resolution, low noise CT reconstructions of fresh mastectomy specimens in order to generate an ensemble of 3D digital breast phantoms that realistically model 3D compressed and uncompressed breast anatomy. The resulting breast models can then be used to simulate realistic projection data for both Breast Tomosynthesis (BT) and Breast CT (BCT) systems thereby providing a powerful evaluation and optimization mechanism for research and development of novel breast imaging systems as well as the optimization of imaging techniques for such systems. Having the capability of using breast object models and simulation software is clinically significant because prior to a clinical trial of any prototype breast imaging system many parameter tradeoffs can be investigated in a simulation environment. This capability is worthwhile not only for the obvious benefit of improving patient safety during initial clinical trials but also because simulation prior to prototype implementation should result in reduced cost and increased speed of development. The main goal of this study is to compare results obtained using two different methods to develop breast object models in order to select the better technique for developing the entire ensemble.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pisano, E.D., et al.: Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. New England Journal of Medicine 353, 1773–1783 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerlikowske, K., et al.: Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 273(2), 149–154 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johns, P.C., Yaffe, M.J.: X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 32(6), 675–695 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Niklason, L.T., et al.: Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205, 399–406 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett, H.H., Myers, K.J.: Foundations of Image Science. John Wiley, Hoboken (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett, H.H., et al.: Model observers for assessment of image quality. In: Images of Science: Science of Images, National Academy of Sciences, Washington (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burgess, A.E.: Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, SPIE, San Diego (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burgess, A.E., Jacobson, F.L., Judy, P.F.: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med. Phys. 28(4), 419–437 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rowland, J.P., Barrett, H.H.: Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 649–658 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bakic, P.R., Albert, M.: Mammogram synthesis using 3D simulation. 1. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. Med. Phys. 29(9), 2131–2139 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor, J.M., et al.: Characterization of a prototype table-top x-ray CT breast imaging system. In: Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, San Diego (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Altunbas, M.C., et al.: A post-reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography. Med. Phys. 34(7), 3109–3117 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vedula, A.A., Glick, S.J., Gong, X.: Computer simulation of CT mammography using a flat-panel imager. In: SPIE Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 5030, pp. 349–360 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Connor, J.M., Das, M., Didier, C., Mah’D, M., Glick, S.J. (2008). Comparison of Two Methods to Develop Breast Models for Simulation of Breast Tomosynthesis and CT. In: Krupinski, E.A. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70537-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70538-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics