Skip to main content

Network Formation with Closeness Incentives

  • Chapter
Networks, Topology and Dynamics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 613))

  • 2024 Accesses

Closeness centrality is an index that has been widely used to assess the strength of an agent's position in a network of relationships. We study the formation of networks in a strategic setting, where every agent tries to optimize his closeness centrality. We investigate how the curvature of the benefit function (decreasing vs. increasing marginal returns) affects the set of stable networks and compare the results to the well-known connections model of Jackson and Wolinsky (JET 71, 1996). It turns out that our model can “replicate” the connections model in the sense that each result is translatable from one model into the other and the sets of stable networks coincide for certain specifications. We conclude that the two models incorporate the same kind of linking behavior and that grouping these “closeness-type” models means a first step in organizing network formation models by the type of incentives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bala V, Goyal S (2000) A noncooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68:1181–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloch F, Jackson M (2006) Equilibrium definitions in network formation games. Int J Game Theory 34:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgatti S, Everett M (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc Networks 28:466–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buechel B, Buskens V (2008) The dynamics of closeness and betweenness. Bielefeld University, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burger M, Buskens V (2006) Social context and network formation: experimental studies. ISCORE 234, Utrecht University

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buskens V, Van de Rijt A (2008) Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. Am J Sociol (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calvó -Armengol A, Ilkilic¸ R (2007) Pairwise-stability and nash equilibria in network formation games. Working paper (2007-01), Univ. Autnoma de Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman L (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(3):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galeotti A, Goyal S, Kamphorst J (2006) Network formation with heteregeneous players. Games Econ Behav 54:353–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal S, Joshi S (2006) Unequal connections. Int J Game Theory 34:319–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goyal S, Vega-Redondo F (2008) Structural holes in social networks. J Econ Theory (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson M, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J Econ Theory 71:44–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamphorst J (2007) Network formation with decreasing marginal benefits of information. Utrecht School of Economics, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Myerson RB (1991) Game theory: analysis of conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in the biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41:116–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers B (2006) A strategic model of network status. Working paper (2006-01), Caltech, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  17. Song S, Nerur S, Teng J (2007) An exploratory study on the roles of network structure and knowledge processing orientation in work unit knowledge management. ACM SIGMIS Database 38:8–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Valente TW, Foreman RK (1998) Integration and radiality: measuring the extent of an individual's connectedness and reachability in a network. Soc Networks 20:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Buechel Berno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berno, B. (2009). Network Formation with Closeness Incentives. In: Naimzada, A.K., Stefani, S., Torriero, A. (eds) Networks, Topology and Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 613. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68409-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics