Skip to main content

Agent-based Simulation for Research in Economics

  • Chapter
Handbook on Information Technology in Finance

Part of the book series: International Handbooks Information System ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Financial theory and financial markets are complex constructs that are not always easy to understand. It is even not possible to explain the function of financial markets on basis of theoretical analysis, since theory normally assumes fully rational agents. [37] have presented the so called “No trade theorem” stating that in a state of efficient equilibrium there will be no trade on markets as long as all participants are fully rational (no noise traders or other uninformed traders) and the structure of information acqusition is common knowledge. It is obvious that the assumptions do not hold in real markets, since we observe asymmetric informed participants or technical traders who base their decisions on the analysis of market movements (and not on the assessment of the underlying value of a stock).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni JA, Miller JH (1990) Auctions with adaptive arti?cialy intelligent agents. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper, No. 90-01-004

    Google Scholar 

  • Arifovic J (1994) Genetic algorithm learning and the cobweb model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB, Holland J, LeBaron B, Palmer R, Tayler P (1996) Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an arti?cial stock market. Technical report, Santa Fe Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1987) Evolving new strategies – the evolution of strategies in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. In Davis L, editor, Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing, Pitman and Morgan Kaufman, pp. 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (2003) Advancing the art of simulation in the social science. Japanese Journal for Management Information System, 12(3), Special Issue on Agent-Based Modeling

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell R (2000) Why agents? on the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent Simulation: Applications, Models and Tools, IL, Argonne National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks J (1998) Principles of simulation. In Banks J, editor, Handbook of Simulation, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman RE (1957) Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman RE (1957) A markov decision process, Journal of Mathematical Mechanics, 6:679–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn JM (1936) Acquisition of skill: An analysis of learning curves, IHRB Report, No. 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulationg human systems, in Adaptive Agents, Intelligence, and Emergent Human Organization: Capturing Complexity Through Agent-Based Modeling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS), 99 (3), Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences of the USA, pp. 7280–7287

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling M, Veloso M (2000) An analysis of stochastic game theory for multiagent reinforcement learning, Technical Report CMU-CS00-165, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/ bowling/papers/00tr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai G, Wurman PR (2005) Monte carlo approximation in incomplete information, sequential auction games, Decision Support Systems, Special Issue: Decision Theory and Game Theory 39(2):153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania C (1999) Thorndike’s legacy: Learning, selection, and the law of effect, Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72(3):425–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein J, Axtell R (1996) Growing Arti?cial Societies – Social Science From the BottomUp, MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Erev I, Roth AE (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria, The American Economic Review, 88(4):848–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Filar J, Vrieze K (1997) Competitive Markov Decision Processes, Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman D (1998) On economic applications of evolutionary game theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8(1):15–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N, Troitzsch K (2005) Simulation for the Social Scientist, Open University Press, Graw-Hill Education, Berkshire, England, second edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Gode D, Sunder, S (1993) Allocative e?ciency of markes with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality, Journal of Political Economy, 101:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall. On an experimental determination of pi, Messeng. Math., 2:113–114, 1873

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley JM, Handscomb DC (1964) Monte Carlo Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Co Ltd, London and Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Arti?cial Systems, MIT Press, Boston, 1st MIT-Press edition (book was originally published 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH, Miller JH (1991) Arti?cial adaptive agents in economic theory, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 81:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommes CH (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and ?nance, in: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL, editors, Handbook of Computational Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RA (1960) Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Wellman, MP (1998) Multiagent reinforcement learning: Theoretical framework and an algorithm, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd KL (1997) Computational economics and economic theory: Substitutes or complements? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(6):907–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW (1996) Reinforcement learning: A survey, Journal of Arti?cial Intelligence Research, 4:237–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman A, The structure of economic interaction: Individual and collective rationality, in: Bourgine P, Nadal JP, editors, Cognitive Economics: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Chapter 18, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 293–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1996) What economists can learn from evolutionary theorists, talk given to the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, http://www.mit.edu/krugman/evolute.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzelmann M, Mäkiö J (2005) Pegged and bracket order as a success factor in stock exchange competition, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference FinanceCom05, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Littman, ML (1994) Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, pp. 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Marimon R (1993) Adaptive learning, evolutionary dynamics and equilibrium selection in games, European Economic Review, 37:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Ulam, S (1949) The monte carlo method, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(247):335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P, Stokey NL (1982) Information, trade, and common knowledge, Journal of Economic Theory, 26(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH (1986) A genetic model of adaptive economic behaviour, Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann D (2004) Market Engineering – A Structured Design Process for Electronic Markets, PhD thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaisen J, Petrov V, Tesfatsion, L (2001) Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(5):504–523, http://www. econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/mpeieee.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Optimatics (2004) Genetic Algorithm Technology for the Water Industry, information on http://www.optimatics.com/GAhistory.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom TM (1988) Computer simulation: The third symbol system, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(5):381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen G (1982) Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, second edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Puterman ML (1994) Markov Decision Processes – Discrete Stochastic Dynmaic Programming, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Puterman ML, Shin MC (1978) Modi?ed policy iteration algorithms for discounted markov decision processes, Management Science, 24:1127–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechmann T (2002) Genetic algorithm learning and economic evolution, in: Chen SH, editor, Evolutionary Computation in Economics and Finance, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC, Models of segregation, The American Economic Review, 59(2):488–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Weiss G (1999) Learning in multiagent systems, In Weiss G, editor, Multiagent Systems, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) pp. 259–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS (1953) Stochastic games, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 39(10):1095–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiglitz K, Honig ML, Cohen LM (1996) A computational market model based on individual action, in Clearwater S, editor, Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation, Hong Kong, 1996, World Scienti?c, see http://www.cs.princeton.edu/ ken/scott.ps

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (2002), Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion L (2002) Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom-up, ISU Economics Working Paper No. 1, February 2002, http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals, Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, II(4, Whole No. 8)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1901) The Human Nature Club; an Introduction to the Study of Mental Life, Longman, Green and Co., New York, 2nd, enl. edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1907) The Elements of Psychology, A.G. Seiler, New York, 2nd edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1909) Darwin’s contribution to psychology, University of California Chronicle, 12:65–80, 1909

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1911) Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies, The Animal Behavior Series. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J (1966) Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins C. (1989) Learning from Delayed Rewards, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins C, Dayan P (1992) Qlearning, Machine Learning, 8(3–4):279–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Dinther, C. (2008). Agent-based Simulation for Research in Economics. In: Seese, D., Weinhardt, C., Schlottmann, F. (eds) Handbook on Information Technology in Finance. International Handbooks Information System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49487-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics