Skip to main content

Decision Support for Emergency Situations

  • Chapter
Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2

Part of the book series: International Handbooks Information System ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Emergency situations occur unpredictably and cause individuals and organizations to shift their focus and attention immediately to deal with the situation. When disasters become large scale, all the limitations resulting from a lack of integration and collaboration among all the involved organizations begin to be exposed and further compound the negative consequences of the event. Often in large-scale disasters the people who must work together have no history of doing so; they have not developed a trust or understanding of one another’s abilities, and the totality of resources they each bring to bear have never before been exercised. As a result, the challenges for individual or group decision support systems (DSS) in emergency situations are diverse and immense. In this contribution, we present recent advances in this area and highlight important challenges that remain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agarwal, R. and E. Karahanna, “Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage,” MIS Quart, 24(4), 2000, 665-694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, L. and R. Von Solms, “A Formalized approach to the Effective Selection and Evaluation of Information Security Controls,” Comput Secur, 8(3), 2000, 185-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones, Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellardo, S., K.R. Karwan and W.A. Wallace, “Managing the Response to Disasters Using Microcomputers,” Interfaces, 14(2), 1984, 29-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigley, G. and K. Roberts, “The Incident Command System: High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task Environments,” Acad Manage J, 44(6), 2001, 1281-2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, T.X. and S.R. Sankaran, “Design Considerations for a virtual information center for humanitarian assistance/disaster relief using workflow modeling,” Decis Support Syst, 31, 2001, 165-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, K., “Business continuity: A Business Survival Strategy,” Inform Syst Contr J , 1, 2002, 28-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currion, P., Keynote address at the 3 rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2006, Newark, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, S., “Reducing Enterprise Risk with Effective Threat Management,” Inform Sec Manage, January/February, 2005, 37-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHO Humanitarian Aid Decision 230201, 2005. Decision Reference ECHO/THM/BUD/2005/02000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt, J. and A. Weiss, RODOS : Decision Support for Off-Site Nuclear Emergency Management in Europe, EUR19144EN, 2000, Luxemburg, European Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J.S., R.L. Lee, D.A. Sumkawa and T.J. Sullivan, “ARAC and Its Modernisation,” Radiat Prot Dosim, 73(1-4), 1997, 241-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA News release 1603-516, By the Numbers: Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Disaster Assistance Update, July 31, 2006. Accessed via http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=28379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H.W., “The Role of new Information Technologies in Emergency Mitigation, Planning, Response and Recovery,” Disast Prev Manage, 7(1), 1998, 28-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modeling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S., J. Bartzis, J. Ehrhardt, J. Lochard, M. Morrey, N. Papamichail, K. Sinkko and A. Sohier, “RODOS: Decision support for nuclear emergencies,” in Zanakis, S.H., Doukidis, G. and Zopounidis, G. (eds.), Recent Developments and Applications in Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000, pp. 379-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S. and C. Niculae, “Believe in the Model: Mishandle the Emergency,” J Home Sec Emergen Manage, 2(1), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S.R., J. Fjermestad, R. Ocker and M. Turoff, “Asynchronous Virtual Teams: Can Software Tools and Structuring of Social Processes Enhance Performance?,” in Galleta, D., Zhang, P. and Sharpe, M.E. (eds.), Volume II: Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Applications, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humanitarian ICT Yahoo! Group. Accessed via http://groups.yahoo.com/group/humanitarian-ict/.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 17799, 2005. Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security management. August 2005. Accessed via http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/popstds/informationsecurity.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczewski, L., and F. Xinli Shi, “Development of Information Security Baselines for Healthcare Information Systems in New Zealand,” Comput Secur, 21(2), 2002, 172-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L., Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennex, M., “Emergency Response Systems: the Utility Y2K Experience,” J Inform Technol Theor Appl, 6(3), 2004, 85-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., A. Tiwana and A. Bush, “Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study,” Inform Syst J, 12, 2002, 103-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., “VISTA, a visualization analysis tool for Humanitarian Situational Awareness,” in Van de Walle, B. and Turoff, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2006, pp. 11-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., “Crisis management and team effectiveness: a closer examination,” J Bus Ethics, 41(3), 2002, 235-249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, K., T. Ishigami and T. Akiyama, “COSTA: A Computerized Support System for Emergency Technical Advice,” Radiat Prot Dosim, 73(1-4), 1997, 277-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, H. and M. Turoff, (eds.), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison Wesley Advanced Book Program, 1975, now online via http://is.njit.edu/turoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Q. and M. Pearson, “ISO 17799: ‘Best practices’ in information security management?,” Commun ACM, 15, 2005, 577-591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markillie, P., “When the Supply Chain Breaks: Being too lean and mean is a dangerous things,” The Economist, June 17, 2006, 16-28, in a special section on “The Physical Internet: A survey of logistics,” 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. and E. Hollnagel, “Human interaction with technology: The accidental user,” Acta Psychol, 91, 1996, 345-358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowshowitz, A., Virtual Organization: Toward a Theory of Societal Transformation Stimulated by Information Technology. Westport, CN: Quorum, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowshowitz, A., “On the Theory of Virtual Organization,” Syst Res Behav Sci, 14(6), 1997, 373-384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niculae, C., “A socio-technical perspective on the use of RODOS in nuclear emergency management,” Ph. D. dissertation, Manchester Business School, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J.F., Jr., A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel and J.F. George, “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work: Theory and Practice at Arizona,” Commun ACM, 34(7), 1991, 40-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.B., Fighting Computer Crime, A New Framework for Protecting Information. New York, NY: Wiley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskob, W., V. Bertsch, J. Geldermann, S. Baig and F. Gering, “Demands to and experience with the Decision Support System RODOS for off-site emergency management in the decision making process in Germany,” in Van de Walle, B. and Carle, B. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International ISCRAM Conference ISCRAM2005, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R.E., “From Adversity to Diversity: Applications of Communication Technology to Crisis Management,” Adv Telecommun Manage, 3, 1990, 91-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K.H., “Managing High Reliability Organizations,” Calif Manage Rev, Summer 1990, 101-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. and R. Bea, “Must Accidents Happen?: Lessons from High Reliability Organizations,” Acad Manage Exec, 15(3), 2001, 70-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski, A.-F., B. Van de Walle, W. van Groenendaal and J. Pol, “When stakeholders perceive threats and risks differently: the use of group support systems to develop a common understanding and a shared response,” J Home Sec Emergen Manage, 2(1), 2005, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski, A.-F., B. Van de Walle and G. Van Den Eede, “The effect of GSS on the emergence of unique information in a risk management process: a field study,” in Proceedings of HICSS40, 2006, 9 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahana Wiki Community, 2006. Accessed via http://www.reliefsource.org/foss/index.php/Sahana

    Google Scholar 

  • Shershakov, V.M., R.V. Borodin and V.S. Kosykh, “Radioecological analysis support system (RECASS),” Radiat Prot Dosim, 50, 1993, 181-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillan, J.E. and M. Hough, “Crisis planning in small businesses: importance, impetus and indifference,” Eur Manage J, 21(3), 2003, 389-407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B., I. Sandelands and J. Dutton, “Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis,” Admin Sci Quart, 26, 1981, 501-524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoneburner, G., A. Goguen and A. Feringa, “Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems,” in Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST Special Publication 800-30, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, B. and I. Han, “The risk analysis based on a business model,” Inform Manage, 2003, 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terada, H., A. Furuno and M. Chino, “Improvement of worldwide version of system for prediction of environmental emergency dose information (WSPEEDI),” J Nucl Sci Technol, 41(5), 2004, 632-640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, M., “Past and Future Emergency Response Information Systems,” Commun ACM, 45(4), 2002, 29-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, M., M. Chumer, R. Hiltz, R. Klashner, M. Alles, M. Vasarhelyi and A. Kogan, “Assuring Homeland Security: Continuous Monitoring, Control, and Assurance of Emergency Preparedness,” J Inform Technol Theor Appl, 6(3), 2004, 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, M., M. Chumer, B. Van de Walle and X. Yao, “The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system,” J Inform Tech Theor Appl, 5(4), 2004, 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, M., M. Chumer and S.R. Hiltz, “Emergency Planning as a Continuous Game,” in Proceedings of ISCRAM 2006 (The third international Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management), NJIT, Newark NJ, May 2006, pp. 477-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.K. Airport News 2006. Accessed via http://www.uk-airport-news.info/heathrow-airport-news-140806b.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eede, G., B. Van de Walle and A.-F. Rutkowski, “Dealing with risk in incident management: an application of High Reliability Theory,” in Proceedings of HICSS40, 2006, 10 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eede, G., W. Muhren, R. Smals and B. Van de Walle, “Incident Response Information Systems Capability: the role of the DERMIS design premises,” in Van de Walle, B. and Turoff, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2006, 2006, pp.251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, B., B. De Baets and E.E. Kerre, “Characterizable Fuzzy Preference structures,” Ann Oper Res, 80, 1998, 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, B., “A relational analysis of decision makers’ preferences,” Int J Intell, 18, 2003, 775–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, B., and A.-F. Rutkowski, “A Fuzzy Decision Support System for IT Service Continuity Threat Assessment,” Decis Support Syst, 2006, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, B. and M. Turoff, “ISCRAM: growing a global R&D Community in Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management,” Int J Emerg Manage, 2006, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogus, T.J., and T.M. Welbourne, “Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations,” J Organ Behav, 24, 2003, 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Solms, R., “Information security management (3): the Code of Practice for Information Security Management (BS 7799),” Inform Manage Comput Sec, 6(5), 1998, 224-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., “Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability,” Calif Manage Rev, 29(2), 1987, 112-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E., K.M. Sutcliffe and D. Obstfeld “Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness,” Res Organ Behav, 21, 1999, 81-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. and K.M. Sutcliffe, Managing the unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco, CalCA: Wiley, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T.M., F. Ackermann and C. Eden, “Project Risk: Systemicity, cause mapping and a scenario approach,” in Kahkonen, K. and Artoo, K.A. (eds.), Managing Risks in Projects. London: E&FN spon, 1997, 343-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F., “Operationalizing and testing normal accidents in petrochemical plants and refineries,” Prod Oper Manag, 10(3), 2001, 292-305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Walle , B., Turoff, M. (2008). Decision Support for Emergency Situations. In: Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2. International Handbooks Information System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics