Skip to main content

Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems

  • Chapter
Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1

Part of the book series: International Handbooks Information System ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

With negotiation being an often difficult process involving complex problems, computerbased support has been employed in its various phases and tasks. This chapter provides a historical overview of software used to support negotiations, aid negotiators, and automate one or more negotiation activities. First, it presents several system classifications, architectures and configurations. Then, it focuses on negotiation support systems (NSSs) and related systems introduced in the early 1980s, and on e-negotiation systems (ENSs), which are deployed on the web. These broad categories are discussed from four perspectives: reallife applications, systems used in research and training, research results, and research frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Accenture, “Accenture and Moai Bring Online Negotiation Solutions to Market,” in Accenture Newroom. 2000. Available via http://accenture.tekgroup.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=3641. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accenture, “Accenture and TradeAccess Form Global Alliance to Introduce Negotiation Solutions for B2B eCommerce,” in Accenture Newsroom, 2000. Available via http://accenture.tekgroup.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=3582. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichler, M., G. Kersten and S. Strecker, “Towards the Structured Design of Electronic Negotiation Media,” Group Decis Negot, 12(4), 2003, 311-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biz-To-Biz, “Buzz 03/29/00,” in Newsbytes PM, 2000. Available via http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HDN/is_2000_March_29/ai_60969424. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronisz, P., L. Krus and A.P. Wierzbicki, “Towards Interactive Solutions in a Bargaining Problem,” in Lewandowski, A. and Wierzbicki, A. (eds.), Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems. Berlin, Springer, 1988, pp. 251-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffam, W. J., E-Business and IS Solutions: An Architectural Approach to Business Problems and Opportunities. Boston, Addison-Wesley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, T., J. Yen, J. Hu, et al., “A Multi-Attribute Negotiation Support System with Market Signaling for Electronic Markets,” Group Decis Negot, 10(6), 2001, 515-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., B.C. Herniter and J.F. Nunamaker, “Labor-management Contract Negotiations in an Electronic Meeting Room: A Case Study,” Group Decis Negot, 2(1), 1993, 27-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G.R., G. Calori, H. Hayami, et al., “The MICS-Asia study: Model Intercomparison of Long-range Transport and Sulphur Deposition in East Asia,” Atmos Environ 36, 2002, 175-199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J.I., “Technology and International Negotiations,” Am J Int Law, 76(1), 2002, 78-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E., G.E. Kersten and R. Vahidov, “Agent-supported Negotiations on Emarketplace,” Int J Electro Bus, 3(1), 2004, 28-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chidambaram, L. and B. Jones, “Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings,” MIS Quart, 17(4), 1993, 465-491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B. and S. Zionts, “Restricted Bargaining for Organizations with Multiple Objectives,” Econometrica 36, 1968, 397-414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R.T., “Look at Me When You Say That: An Electronic Negotiation Simulation,” Simulat Gaming, 30(1), 1999, 23-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cybersettle, I., “Cybersettle.com,” 2006. Available via www.cybersettle.com. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, A. and D. Olson, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making Models in Group Decision Support,” Group Decis Negot, 7(1), 1998, 55-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quart, 13, 1989, 318-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, M.M., A. Foroughi and W.C. Perkins, “An Empirical Study of the Efficacy of a Computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS),” Decis Support Syst 20, 1997, 185-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., J.F. George, L.M. Jessup, et al., “Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings,” MIS Quart, 12(4), 1988, 591-624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. and R.B. Gallupe, “A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems,” Manag Sci, 33(5), 1987, 589-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., J.N. Druckman and T. Arai, “e-Mediation: Evaluating the Impacts of an Electronic Mediator on Negotiating Behavior,” Group Decis Negot, 13(6), 2004, 481-511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., E. Kopelman and A.K. Schneider, Beyond Machiavelli. Tools for Coping with Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J. and S.R. Hiltz, “An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results,” J Manag Inform Syst, 15(3), 1999, 7-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi, A., W.C. Perkins and M.T. Jelassi, “An Empirical-Study of An Interactive, Session-Oriented Computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS),” Group Decis Negot, 4(6), 1995, 485-512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, R., A Methodology for Client/Server and Web Application Development. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N.M. and K.W. Hipel, Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York, N.Y.: North-Holland, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R.P., “Online Group Decision-Support by Preference Programming In Traffic Planning,” Group Decis Negot, 5(4-6), 1984, 485-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R.P., E. Kettunen, M. Marttunen, et al., “Evaluating a Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support in Water Resources Management,” Group Decis Negot 10(4), 2001, 331-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, C., “Viewing Control Structures as Patterns of Passing Messages,” Artif Intell, 8(3), 1977, 323-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C.W., H. Lai and A.B. Whinston, “Analysis of Negotiation Support System Research,” J Comput Inform Syst, 35(3), 1995, 2-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hordijk, L., “Use of the RAINS Model in Acid Rain Negotiation in Europe,” Environ Sci Technol, 25(4), 1991, 596-603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insua, D.R., J. Holgado and R. Moreno, “Multicriteria e-Negotiation Systems for e-Democracy,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(2), 2003, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarke, M., M.T. Jelassi and M.F. Shakun, “MEDIATOR: Towards a Negotiation Support System,” Eur J Oper Res, 31(3), 1987, 314-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N.R., P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, et al., “Automated Negotiations: Prospects, Methods and Challenges,” Group Decis Negot, 10(2), 2001, 199-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B.H., Analytical Negotiation: An Empirical Examination of Effects of Computer Support for Different Levels of Conflict in Two-party Bargaining. Dissertation, School of Business, Indiana University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E., “NEGO – Group Decision Support System,” Inform Manag, 8(5), 1985, 237-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E., “The Science and Engineering of E-negotiation: An Introduction,” in Proc Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci, 2003, 27-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E., “E-negotiation Systems: Interaction of People and Technologies to Resolve Conflicts,” The Magnus Journal of Management, 1(3),2005, 71-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • .Kersten, G.E., E. Chen, D. Neumann, et al., “On Comparison of Mechanisms of Economic and Social Exchanges: The Times Model,” in Dagstuhl-Seminar: Negotiation and Market Engineering, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. and H. Lai, “Satisfiability and Completeness of Protocols for Electronic Negotiations,” Eur J Oper Res, 2007, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. and G. Lo, “Aspire: Integration of Negotiation Support System and Software Agents for E-Business Negotiation,” Int J Internet Enterprise Manag, 1(3), 2003, 293-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. and W. Michalowski, “A Cooperative Expert System for Negotiation With a Hostage-Taker,” Int J Expert Syst, 2(3/4), 1989, 357-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. and S.J. Noronha, “WWW-based Negotiation Support: Design, Implementation, and Use,” Decis Support Syst, 25, 1999, 135-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettelle, J., “When Three’s Not a Crowd,” ORMS Today, 33(5), 2006, 20-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D.M., “Negotiation Support Using the Decision-Support System GMCR,” Group Decis Negot, 5(4-6), 1996, 371-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P., H. Moskowitz, J. Wallenius, et al., “An Interactive Approach to Multiple Criteria Optimization with Multiple Decision-Makers,” Nav Res Logist Q, 33, 1986, 589-602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köszegi, S., R. Vetschera and G.E. Kersten, “Cultural Influences on the Use and Perception of Internet-based NSS – An Exploratory Analysis,” Int Negot J, 9(1), 2002, 79-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., “Multiagent Negotiation under Time Constraints,” Artif Intell, 75(2), 1995, 297-345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreifelts, T. and F. v.Martial, “A Negotiation Framework for Autonomous Agents,” in Demazeau, Y. and Muller, J.-P. (eds.), Decentralized Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1991, pp. 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, H., A Theoretical Basis for Negotiation Support Systems. Dissertation, Krannert School of Management Purdue University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, H., H.-S. Doong, C.-C. Kao, et al., “Understanding Behavior and Perception of Negotiators from Their Strategies,” Group Decis Negot, 15(5), 2006, 429-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.C., I. Kang and J.S. Kim, “Exploring the User Interface of Negotiation Support Systems from the User Acceptance Perspective,” Comput Hum Behav, 23(1), 2007, 220-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, P.M., “A Bad Treaty Returns. The Case of the Law of the Sea Treaty,” World Aff, 160(3),1998, 134-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempereur, A., “Innovation in Teaching Negotiation: Towards a Relevant Use of Multimedia Tools,” Int Negot J 9(1), 1998, 141-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.J. and J.A. Litterer, Negotiation. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J., “An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of NSS and Proximity on Negotiation Outcomes,” Behav Inform Tech, 19(5), 2000, 329-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L.-H. and I. Benbasat, “A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems.” J Manag Inform Syst, 9, 1992, 27-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., R.H. Guttman and A.G. Moukas, “Agents that Buy and Sell: Transforming Commerce as we Know It,” Comm ACM, 42(3), 1999, 81-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, M., “Modeling Techniques for Complex Environmental Problems,” in Makowski, M. and Nakayama, H. (eds.) Natural Environment Management and Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenburg: IIASA, 2001, pp. 41–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matwin, S., S. Szpakowicz, Z. Koperczak, et al., “Negoplan: An Expert System Shell for Negotiation Support,” IEEE Expert, 4(4), 1989, 50-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., T. Kurtzberg, L. Thompson, et al., “Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations,” Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 77(1), 1999, 22-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., T. Kurtzberg, L. Thompson, et al., “Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations,” Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 77(1), 1999, 22-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, H., J. Wallenius, P. Korhonen, et al., A Man-Machine Interactive Approach to Collective Bargaining. Buffalo: SUNY, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustajoki, J. and R.P. Hamalainen, “Web-HIPRE: Global Decision Support by Value Tree and AHP Analysis,” INFOR, 38(3), 2000, 208-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustajoki, J., R.P. Hamalainen and M. Marttunen, “Participatory Multicriteria Decision Analysis with Web-HIPRE: A Case of Lake Regulation Policy,” Environ Model Software, 19(6), 2004, 537-547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B.A. and V.L. O’Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • NovaForum, “The Electronic Courthouse,” 2006. Available via http://www.electroniccourthouse.com. Accessed: Dec. 10,2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhart, J.D. and C. Goeltner, “Computer Models as Support for Complex Negotiations,” in International Conference for the Society for General System Research, Budapest, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J.M. and P. Neye, “The Impact of Communication Media on Negotiation Outcomes,” Int J Conflict Manag, 11(2), 2000, 162-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H., The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswamy, A., J. Eliasberg, R.R. Burke, et al., “Developing Marketing Expert Systems: An Application to International Negotiations,” J Market, 53, 1989, 24-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswamy, A. and G.R. Shell, “Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an “Electronic Bargaining Table,” Manag Sci, 43(8), 1997, 1147-1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, A.K., “Finding the “Right” Price,” in Supply & Demand Chain Executive, 2001. Available via http://www.sdcexec.com/publication/article.jsp?pubId=1&id=1404. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, E. G. and S.V. Ahamed, “An Expert System for Labor-Management Negotiation,” Proceedings of the Society for Computer Simulation Conference, Boston, MA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, G., “Philosophy of Socio-Technical Systems,” Techné 4(3), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, C., Online Dispute Resolution for Business. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. and J.M. Alexander, Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Approach. New York: Praeger, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B. and U. Lechner, “Logic for Media – The Computational Media Metaphor,” Proc Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoop, M., A. Jertila and T. List, “Negoisst: N Negotiation Support System for Electronic Business-to-business Negotiations in E-commerce,” Data Knowl Eng, 47(3), 2003, 371-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoop, M., F. Kohne and D. Staskiewicz, “An Integrated Decision and Communication Perspective on Electronic Negotiation Support Systems: Challenges and Solutions,” J Decis Syst, 14(4), 2004, 375-398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoop, M. and C. Quix, “DOC.COM: A Framework for Effective Negotiation Support in Electronic Marketplaces,” Comput Network, 37(2), 2001, 153-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, J.K., Negotiating the Law of the Sea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starke, K. and A. Rangaswamy, “Computer-Mediated Negotiations: Review and Research Opportunities,” in Kent, A. and Williams, J.G. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Microcomputers, vol 25. University Park: Marcel, 2000, pp. 47-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ströbel, M., Engineering Electronic Negotiations. New York: Kluwer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ströbel, M. and C. Weinhardt, “The Montreal Taxonomy for Electronic Negotiations,” Group Decis Negot, 12(2), 2003, 143-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K., “Multiagent Compromise via Negotiation,” in Huhns, M. and Gasser, L. (eds.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1989, pp. 119-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K. P., “Persuasive Argumentation in Negotiation,” Theor Decis, 28(3), 1990, 203-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teich, J., Decision Support for Negotiation. Dissertation, School of Management, SUNY Buffalo, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teich, J., H. Wallenius, M. Kuula, et al., “A Decision Support Approach for Negotiation with an Application to Agricultural Income Policy Negotiations,” Eur J Oper Res, 81, 1995, 76-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teich, J., H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, et al., “Designing Electronic Auctions: An Internet-Based Hybrid Procedure Combining Aspects of Negotiations and Auctions,” J Electron Commerce Res, 1, 2001, 301-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, E. M., “SmartSettle described with the Montreal Taxonomy,” Group Decis Negot, 2(12), 2002, 165-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C., “Agents and E-commerce: Using Intelligent Agents to Buy and Sell Goods Can Create Truly Rational Market Behaviour,” Rep Bus Mag, 16(3), 1999, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. and J. Nadler, “Negotiating via Information Technology: Theory and Application,” J Soc Stud, 58(1), 2002, 109-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuinstra, W., L. Hordijk and M. Amann, “Using Computer Models in International Negotiations – The Case of Acidification in Europe,” Environment, 41(9), 1999, 33-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera, R., G.E. Kersten and S. Köszegi, “The Determinants of NSS Success: An Integrated Model and Its Evaluation,” J Organ Comput and Electron Commerce, 16(2), 2006, 123-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., G.E. Kersten and M.H. Hine, “An Inspire ENS Graph is Worth 334 Words, on Average,” Electron Market, 16(3), 2006, 186-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., “Online Negotiation in Electronic Commerce,” International Journal of Management Theory and Practices, 4(1), 2003, 39-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., J.B. Rose and N. Archer, “A Web-Based Negotiation Support System,” Electron Market, 8(3), 1998, 13-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kersten, G., Lai, H. (2008). Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems. In: Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1. International Handbooks Information System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48713-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics