Skip to main content

SOLAR: A Consequence Finding System for Advanced Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2796))

Abstract

SOLAR is an efficient first-order consequence finding system based on a connection tableau format with Skip operation. Consequence finding 1,2,3,4 is a generalization of refutation finding or theorem proving, and is useful for many reasoning tasks such as knowledge compilation, inductive logic programming, abduction. One of the most significant calculus of consequence finding is SOL 2. SOL is complete for consequence finding and can find all minimal-length consequences with respect to subsumption. SOLAR (SOL for Advanced Reasoning) is an efficient implementation of SOL and can avoid producing non-minimal/redundant consequences due to various state of the art pruning methods, such as skip-regularity, local failure caching, folding-up (see 5,6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. del Val, A.: A new method for consequence finding and compilation in restricted languages. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1999, 259–264 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Inoue, K.: Linear resolution for consequence finding. Artificial Intelligence 56, 301–353 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Minicozzi, E., Reiter, R.: A note on linear resolution strategies in consequence-finding. Artificial Intelligence 3, 175–180 (1972)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Slagle, J.R., Chang, C., Lee, R.C.: Completeness theorems for semantic resolution in consequence-finding. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1969, 281–285 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iwanuma, K., Inoue, K., Satoh, K.: Completeness of pruning methods for consequence finding procedure SOL. In: Proceedings of FTP 2000, 89–100 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iwanuma, K., Inoue, K.: Conditional answer computation in SOL as speculative computation in multi-agent environments. In: Proceedings of CLIMA 2002, pp. 149–162 (2002); It also appears in Electronic Notes on Theoretical Computer Science 70(5) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto, A.: Representing inductive inference with SOLD-resolution. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1997 Workshop on Abduction and Induction in AI, pp. 59–63 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue, K.: Induction, abduction, and consequence-finding. In: Rouveirol, C., Sebag, M. (eds.) ILP 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2157, pp. 65–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Reiser, P., King, R.D., Kell, D.B., Muggleton, S.H., Bryant, C.H., Oliver, S.G.: Developing a logical model of yeast metabolism. Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence 5, 223–244 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McIlraith, S., Amir, E.: Theorem proving with structured theories. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2001, pp. 624–631 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loveland, D.W.: Automated Theorem Proving: a logical basis. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Siegel, P.: Représentation et utilization de la connaissance en calcul propositionnel. In: Thése d’État, Université d’Aix-Marseille II, Luminy, France (1987) (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Letz, R.: Clausal tableaux. In: Bibel, W., Schmitt, P.H. (eds.) Automated Deduction - A Basis for Applications. Foundations, vol. I, pp. 39–68. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Letz, R., Goller, C., Mayr, K.: Controlled integration of the cut rule into connection tableau calculi. Journal of Automated Reasoning 13, 297–338 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. McCune, W.: Experiments with discrimination-tree indexing and path indexing for term retrieval. Journal of Automated Reasoning 9, 147–167 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.: The TPTP problem library for automated theorem proving v2.5.0 (2002), http://www.tptp.org/

  17. McCune, W.: OTTER3.0 reference manual and guide. Technical Report ANL- 94/6, Argonne National Laboratory (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simon, L., del Val, A.: Efficient consequence finding. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2001, pp. 359–370 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nabeshima, H., Iwanuma, K., Inoue, K. (2003). SOLAR: A Consequence Finding System for Advanced Reasoning. In: Cialdea Mayer, M., Pirri, F. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods . TABLEAUX 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2796. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45206-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45206-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40787-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45206-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics