Skip to main content

Projective DNF Formulae and Their Revision

  • Conference paper
Learning Theory and Kernel Machines

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2777))

Abstract

Valiant argued that biology imposes various constraints on learnability, and, motivated by these constraints, introduced his model of projection learning [14]. Projection learning aims to learn a target concept over some large domain, in this paper {0,1}n, by learning some of its projections to a class of smaller domains, and combining these projections. Valiant proved a general mistake bound for the resulting algorithm under certain conditions. The basic assumption underlying projection learning is that there is a family of simple projections that cover all positive instances of the target, where simple means belonging to some efficiently learnable class. The projections describing the target in this way can also be thought of as a set of experts, each specialized to classify a subset of the instances, such that whenever two experts overlap they always agree in their classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angluin, D.: Queries revisited. In: Abe, N., Khardon, R., Zeugmann, T. (eds.) ALT 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2225, pp. 12–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Auer, P., Warmuth, M.K.: Tracking the best disjunction. Machine Learning 32(2), 127–150 (1998); Earlier version in 36th FOCS (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, A.: On-line algorithms in machine learning (1996), Available from http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~avrim/Papers/pubs.html

  4. Goldsmith, J., Sloan, R.H., Szörényi, B., Turán, G.: Theory revision with queries: Horn, read-once, and parity formulas. Technical Report TR03-039, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) (2003) (Also submitted for journal publication), Available at http://www.eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc/

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldsmith, J., Sloan, R.H., Turán, G.: Theory revision with queries: DNF formulas. Machine Learning 47(2/3), 257–295 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hegedüs, T.: Generalized teaching dimensions and the query complexity of learning. In: Proc. 8th Annu. Conf. on Comput. Learning Theory, pp. 108–117. ACM Press, New York (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellerstein, L., Pillaipakkamnatt, K., Raghavan, V., Wilkins, D.: How many queries are needed to learn? J. ACM 43(5), 840–862 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Helmbold, D., Sloan, R., Warmuth, M.K.: Learning nested differences of intersection closed concept classes. Machine Learning 5(2), 165–196 (1990); Special Issue on Computational Learning Theory, first appeared in 2nd COLT conference (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kivinen, J., Warmuth, M.K.: Additive versus exponentiated gradient updates for linear prediction. In: Proc. 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 209–218. ACM Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Littlestone, N.: Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linearthreshold algorithm. Machine Learning 2(4), 285–318 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Littlestone, N.: A mistake-bound version of Rivest’s decision-list algorithm. Personal communication to Avrim Blum (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mesterharm, C.: Tracking linear-threshold concepts with Winnow. In: Kivinen, J., Sloan, R.H. (eds.) COLT 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2375, pp. 138–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Rivest, R.L.: Learning decision lists. Machine Learning 2, 229–246 (1987)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Valiant, L.G.: Projection learning. Machine Learning 37(2), 115–130 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Valiant, L.G.: A neuroidal architecture for cognitive computation. Journal of the ACM 47(5), 854–882 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wrobel, S.: Concept Formation and Knowledge Revision. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wrobel, S.: First order theory refinement. In: De Raedt, L. (ed.) Advances in ILP, pp. 14–33. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sloan, R.H., Szörényi, B., Turán, G. (2003). Projective DNF Formulae and Their Revision. In: Schölkopf, B., Warmuth, M.K. (eds) Learning Theory and Kernel Machines. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2777. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45167-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45167-9_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40720-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45167-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics