Skip to main content

  • Conference paper
Automated Deduction – CADE-19 (CADE 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2741))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We make the notion of scope in the λ-calculus explicit. To that end, the syntax of the λ-calculus is extended with an end-of-scope operator ⋌, matching the usual opening of a scope due to λ. Accordingly, β-reduction is extended to the set of scoped λ-terms by performing minimal scope extrusion before performing replication as usual. We show confluence of the resulting scoped β-reduction. Confluence of β-reduction for the ordinary λ-calculus is obtained as a corollary, by extruding scopes maximally before forgetting them altogether. Only in this final forgetful step, α-equivalence is needed. All our proofs have been verified in Coq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, M., Cardelli, L., Curien, P.-L., Lévy, J.-J.: Explicit substitutions. Journal of Functional Programming 1(4), 375–416 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Asperti, A., Guerrini, S.: The Optimal Implementation of Functional Programming Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barendregt, H.P.: The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 103. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baro, S., Maurel, F.: The qν and qνk calculi: name capture and control. PPS prépublication 16, Université Denis Diderot (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkling, K.J.: A symmetric complement to the lambda-calculus. Interner Bericht ISF-76-7, GMD, D-5205, St. Augustin 1, West Germany (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bird, R.S., Paterson, R.A.: De Bruijn notation as a nested datatype. Journal of Functional Programming 9(1), 77–91 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Blom, S.C.C.: Term Graph Rewriting, syntax and semantics. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonelli, E.: Substitutions explicites et réécriture de termes. PhD thesis, Université Paris XI (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cardelli, L., Gordon, A.D.: Mobile ambients. In: Nivat, M. (ed.) FOSSACS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1378, pp. 140–155. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, C., Xi, H.: Meta-programming through typeful code representation, http://www.cs.bu.edu/~hwxi/

  11. Church, A.: A set of postulates for the foundation of logic. Annals of Mathematics 33, 346–366 (1932)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Comon, H., Dauchet, M., Gilleron, R., Jacquemard, F., Lugiez, D., Tison, S., Tommasi, M.: Tree automata techniques and applications, http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/tata

  13. David, R., Guillaume, B.: A λ-calculus with explicit weakening and explicit substitution. Mathematical Structures for Computer Science 11, 169–206 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. de Bruijn, N.G.: Lambda calculus notation with nameless dummies, a tool for automatic formula manipulation. Indagationes Mathematicae 34, 381–392 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Di Cosmo, R., Kesner, D., Polonovski, E.: Proof nets and explicit substitutions. In: Tiuryn, J. (ed.) FOSSACS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1784, pp. 63–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon, A.D., Melham, T.F.: Five axioms of alpha-conversion. In: von Wright, J., Harrison, J., Grundy, J. (eds.) TPHOLs 1996. LNCS, vol. 1125, pp. 173–190. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hollenberg, M., Vermeulen, C.F.M.: Counting variables in a dynamic setting. Journal of Logic and Computation 6(5), 725–744 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahrs, S.: Context rewriting. In: Rusinowitch, M., Remy, J.-L. (eds.) CTRS 1992. LNCS, vol. 656, pp. 21–35. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lafont, Y.: Interaction nets. In: POPL 1990, pp. 95–108. ACM Press, New York (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lafont, Y.: From proof-nets to interaction nets. In: Girard, J.-Y., Lafont, Y., Regnier, L. (eds.) Advances in Linear Logic. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 222, pp. 225–248. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamping, J.: An algorithm for optimal lambda calculus reduction. In: POPL 1990, pp. 16–30. ACM Press, New York (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Lévy, J.-J.: Réductions correctes et optimales dans le λ-calcul. Thèse de doctorat d’´etat, Université Paris VII (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parrow, J.: The fusion calculus: Expressiveness and symmetry in mobile processes. In: LICS 1998, pp. 176–185. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schroer, D.E.: The Church–Rosser Theorem. PhD thesis, Cornell University (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Terese. Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vestergaard, R., Brotherston, J.: A formalised first-order confluence proof for the λ-calculus using one-sorted variable names. In: Middeldorp, A. (ed.) RTA 2001. LNCS, vol. 2051, pp. 306–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hendriks, D., van Oostrom, V. (2003). ⋌. In: Baader, F. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-19. CADE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2741. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40559-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45085-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics