Skip to main content

Formal Reasoning Techniques for Goal Models

  • Chapter
Journal on Data Semantics I

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((JODS,volume 2800))

Abstract

Over the past decade, goal models have been used in Computer Science in order to represent software requirements, business objectives and design qualities. Such models extend traditional AI planning techniques for representing goals by allowing for partially defined and possibly inconsistent goals. This paper presents a formal framework for reasoning with such goal models. In particular, the paper proposes a qualitative and a numerical axiomatization for goal modeling primitives and introduces label propagation algorithms that are shown to be sound and complete with respect to their respective axiomatizations. In addition, the paper reports on experimental results on the propagation algorithms applied to a goal model for a US car manufacturer.

This is an extended and updated version of the paper: Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Nicchiarelli, E., and Sebastiani, R., “Reasoning with Goal Models”. In S. Spaccapietra, S. T. March, and Y. Kambayashi (Eds.), Conceptual Modeling – ER 2002, proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, LNCS 2503 Springer, 2002.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anton, A.I.: Goal based requirements analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Requirements Engineering ICRE 1996, pp. 136–144 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anton, A.I., Potts, C.: The use of goals to surface requirements for evolving systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1998), Kyoto, Japan, April 1998, pp. 157–166 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, A., Furst, M.: Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90(1-2) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boehm, B.: Identify quality-requirements conflicts. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Requirements Engineering ICRE 1996, Colorado spring, Colorado (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bundy, A., Giunchiglia, F., Sebastiani, R., Walsh, T.: Calculating Criticalities. Artificial Intelligence 88(1-2) (December 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming 20(1-2), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarvis, R., McArthur, G., Mylopoulos, J., Rodriguez-Gianolli, P., Zhou, S.: Semantic Models for Knowledge Management. In: Proc. of the Second International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaindl, H.: A design process based on a model combining scenarios with goals and functions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetic 30(5), 537–551 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kautz, H., McAllester, D., Selman, B.: Encoding Plans in Propositional Logic. In: Proceedings International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and Using Non-Functional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 6(18), 483–497 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Newell, A., Simon, H.: GPS: A Program that Simulates Human Thought. In: Feigenbaum, E., Feldman, J. (eds.) Computers and Thought. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson, N.: Problem Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rolland, C., Grosz, Kla, R.: Experience with goal-scenario coupling. In: Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Limerik, Ireland (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rolland, C., Souveyet, C., Ben Achour, C.: Guiding goal modelling using scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(12) (December 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamsweerde, A.v., Darimont, R., Letier, E.: Managing conflicts in goaldriven requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(11), 908–926 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weld, D.S.: Recent Advances in AI Planning. AI Magazine 20(2), 93–123 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Nicchiarelli, E., Sebastiani, R. (2003). Formal Reasoning Techniques for Goal Models. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S., Aberer, K. (eds) Journal on Data Semantics I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2800. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39733-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39733-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20407-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39733-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics