Skip to main content

Voxel or MIRD-type model: a sensitivity study relevant to nuclear medicine

  • Conference paper
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 14))

Abstract

Scope of this work is to investigate for which type of radiopharmaceuticals is particularly important to perform patient dosimetry using realistic reference voxel models (a male and a female) instead of the MIRD-type model. For the present work, calculations for patient doses were performed using biokinetic data and the SAFs of the voxel models. A comparison in relation to organ and effective dose estimates by the two methods was done for radiopharmaceuticals chosen for their widely differing biodistributions. By comparing directly the organ doses resulting from the MIRD-type phantom to those from the voxel ones, both types representing the average patient, it can be studied for which types of radiopharmaceuticals a change-over to voxel-based SAFs is essential. Moreover, gender specific differences were studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cristy M, Eckerman F (1987) Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. Vol 1–7 (ORNL/TM-8381/V1), Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petoussi-Henß N, Zankl, M (1998) Voxel anthropomorphic models as a tool for internal dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 79: 415–418

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones D G (1998) A realistic anthropomorphic phantom for calculating specific absorbed fractions of energy deposited from internal gamma emitters. Radiat Prot Dosim 79(1–4): 411

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoriyaz H, Santos A D, Stabin M G et al (2000) Absorbed fractions in a voxel-based phantom calculated with the MCNP-4B code. Med Phys 27(7): 1555–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith T, Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl, M (2000) Comparison of internal radiation doses estimated by MIRD and voxel techniques for a ‘family’ of phantoms. Eur J Nucl Med 27(9): 1387–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, T J, Phipps A W, Petoussi-Henss N et al (2001) Impact on internal doses of photon SAFs derived with the GSF adult male voxel phantom. Health Phys 80(5): 477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stabin M G, Yoriyaz, H. (2002) Photon specific absorbed fractions calculated in the trunk of an adult male voxel-based phantom. Health Phys 82(1): 21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zankl M, Petoussi-Henss N, Fill U et al (2003) The application of voxel phantoms to the internal dosimetry of radionuclides. Radiat Prot Dosim 105: 539–548

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aubineau-Lanièce I, de Carlan L, Clairand I et al (2005) Current developments at IRSN on computational tools dedicated to assessing doses for both internal and external exposure. Radiat Prot Dosim 115(1–4): 522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2002) Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values, Pergamon Press, 89, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zankl M, Becker J, Fill U and Petoussi-Henss N. GSF male and female adult voxel models representing ICRP reference man-the present status. American Nuclear Society Topical Meeting in Monte Carlo, Chattanooga, TN, April 2005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Becker J, Zankl M, Petoussi-Henss N Modifications of human voxel models used for radiation protection calculations (These proceedings)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zankl M, Wittmann A (2001) The adult male voxel model “Golem” segmented from whole body CT patient data. Radiat. Environ. Biophys 40:153–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl M, Fill U, et al (2002) The GSF family of voxel phantoms Phys Med Biol 47: 89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fill U, Zankl M, Petoussi-Henss N et al (2004) Adult female voxel models of different stature and photon conversion coefficients for radiation protection. Health Phys 86: 253–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawrakow I, Rogers, DWO (2003) The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. National Research Council of Canada, PIRS-701

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zubal I G, Harrell C R, Smith E O et al. (1994) Computerized threedimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys 21(2): 299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1998). Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals-Addendum to ICRP 53. (ICRP Publication 80), Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl M, Nosske D (2005) Estimation of patient dose from radiopharmaceuticals using voxel models. Cancer Biother. Radio. 20(1): 103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Petoussi-Henss .

Editor information

R. Magjarevic J. H. Nagel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Petoussi-Henss, N., Zankl, M., Hoeschen, C., Nosske, D. (2007). Voxel or MIRD-type model: a sensitivity study relevant to nuclear medicine. In: Magjarevic, R., Nagel, J.H. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_519

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_519

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36839-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36841-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics