Skip to main content

The Metagrammar Compiler: An NLP Application with a Multi-paradigm Architecture

  • Conference paper
Multiparadigm Programming in Mozart/Oz (MOZ 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3389))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The concept of metagrammar has been introduced to factorize information contained in a grammar. A metagrammar compiler can then be used to compute an actual grammar from a metagrammar. In this paper, we present a new metagrammar compiler based on 2 important concepts from logic programming, namely (1) the Warren’s Abstract Machine and (2) constraints on finite set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. XTAG-Research-Group: A lexicalized tree adjoining grammar for english. Technical Report IRCS-01-03, IRCS, University of Pennsylvania (2001), Available at, http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~xtag/gramrelease.html

  2. Abeillé, A., Candito, M., Kinyon, A.: Ftag: current status and parsing scheme. In: VEXTAL, Venice, Italy (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kroch, A., Joshi, A.: The linguistic relevance of tree adjoining grammars. Technical report, MS-CIS-85-16, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joshi, A., Schabes, Y.: Tree-adjoining grammars. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3, pp. 69–124. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vijay-Shanker, K., Schabes, Y.: Structure sharing in lexicalized tree adjoining grammars. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1992), Nantes, pp. 205–212 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Candito, M.: Représentation modulaire et paramétrable de grammaires électroniques lexicalisées: application au français et à l’italien. PhD thesis, Université Paris 7 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaiffe, B., Crabbé, B., Roussanaly, A.: A new metagrammar compiler. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Frameworks (TAG+6), Venice (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xia, F., Palmer, M., Vijay-Shanker, K.: Toward semi-automating grammar development. In: Proc. of the 5th Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium(NLPRS-1999), Beijing, China (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers, J., Vijay-Shanker, K.: Reasoning with descriptions of trees. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 72–80 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crabbé, B.: Lexical classes for structuring the lexicon of a tag. In: Proceedings of the Lorraine/Saarland workshop on Prospects and Advances in the Syntax/Semantics Interface (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crabbé, B.: Alternations, monotonicity and the lexicon: an application to factorising information in a tree adjoining grammar. In: Proceedings of the 15th ESSLLI, Vienne (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perrier, G.: Interaction grammars. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), Saarbrucken, pp. 600–606 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Roy, P.: Extended dcg notation: A tool for applicative programming in prolog. Technical report, Technical Report UCB/CSD 90/583, Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ait-Kaci, H.: Warren’s abstract machine: A tutorial reconstruction. In: Furukawa, K. (ed.) Logic Programming: Proc. of the Eighth International Conference, p. 939. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duchier, D.: Constraint programming for natural language processing (2000) Lecture Notes. In: ESSLLI 2000 (2000), Available at, http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/Papers/abstracts/duchier-esslli2000.html

  16. Crabbé, B., Gaiffe, B., Roussanaly, A.: Représentation et gestion du lexique d’une grammaire d’arbres adjoints, Traitement Automatique des Langues, 43,3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Villemonte de la Clergerie, E.: Designing efficient parsers with DyALog, Slides presented at GLINT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duchier, D., Le Roux, J., Parmentier, Y. (2005). The Metagrammar Compiler: An NLP Application with a Multi-paradigm Architecture. In: Van Roy, P. (eds) Multiparadigm Programming in Mozart/Oz. MOZ 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3389. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31845-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31845-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25079-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31845-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics