Skip to main content

Cognitive Load Effects on End User Understanding of Conceptual Models: An Experimental Analysis

  • Conference paper
Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3255))

Abstract

According to Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), presenting information in a way that cognitive load falls within the limitations of working memory can improve speed and accuracy of understanding, and facilitate deep understanding of information content. This paper describes a laboratory experiment which investigates the effects of reducing cognitive load on end user understanding of conceptual models. Participants were all naïve users, and were given a data model consisting of almost a hundred entities, which corresponds to the average-sized data model encountered in practice. One group was given the model in standard Entity Relationship (ER) form and the other was given the same model organised into cognitively manageable “chunks”. The reduced cognitive load representation was found to improve comprehension and verification accuracy by more than 50%, though conflicting results were found for time taken. The practical significance of this research is that it shows that managing cognitive load can improve end user understanding of conceptual models, which will help reduce requirements errors. The theoretical significance is that it provides a theoretical insight into the effects of complexity on understanding of conceptual models, which have previously been unexplored. The research findings have important design implications for all conceptual modelling notations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Entity Relationship And Object Oriented Model Automatic Clustering. Data And Knowledge Engineering 20(1), 87–117 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baddeley, A., Hitch, G.: Working Memory. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 8, Academic Press, London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baddeley, A.D.: The Magical Number Seven: Still Magic After All These Years? Psychological Review 101(2), 353–356 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baddeley, A.D.: Essentials of Human Memory. In: Cognitive psychology, p. xi, 356. Psychology Press, Hove (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bannert, M.: Managing Cognitive Load: Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Learning and Instruction 12(1), 139–146 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batini, C., Ceri, S., Navathe, S.B.: Conceptual Database Design: An Entity Relationship Approach. Benjamin Cummings, Redwood City (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Browne, G.J., Ramesh, V.: Improving Information Requirements Determination: A Cognitive Perspective. Information & Management 39, 625–645 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program, Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P.P.: The Entity Relationship Model: Towards An Integrated View Of Data. ACM Transactions On Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, P.P.: Entity-Relationship Modeling: Historical Events, Future Trends, and Lessons Learned. In: Broy, M., Denert, E. (eds.) Software Pioneers: Contributions to Software Engineering, pp. 100–114. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cofer, C.N.: On Some Factors in the Organisational Characteristics of Free Recall. American Psychologist, 261–272 (April 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M.: Modelling in Australian Practice - Preliminary Insights. Information Age, 34–42 (February 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, G.B: Strategies for Information Requirements Determination. IBM Systems Journal 21(1) (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Driver, M., Mock, T.: Human Information Processing Decision Style Theory and Accounting Information Systems. Accounting Review 50 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ewusi-Mensah, K.: Critical Issues in Abandoned Information Systems Projects. Communications of the ACM 40, 74–80 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman, P., Miller, D.: Entity Model Clustering: Structuring A Data Model By Abstraction. The Computer Journal 29(4), 348–360 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finklestein, C.: An Introduction to Information Engineering: From Strategic Planning to Information Systems. Addison-Wesley, Singapore (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flood, R.L., Carson, E.R.: Dealing With Complexity: An Introduction To The Theory And Application Of Systems Science. Plenum Press, New York (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldstein, R.C., Storey, V.C.: Some Findings On The Intuitiveness Of Entity Relationship Constructs. In: Lochovsky, F.H. (ed.) Entity Relationship Approach To Database Design And Querying, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hahn, J., Kim, J.: Why Are Some Diagrams Easier to Work With?: Effects of Diagrammatic Representation on the Cognitive Integration Process of Systems Analysis and Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(3), 181–213 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hitchman, S.: Practitioner Perceptions On The Use Of Some Semantic Concept. In: The Entity Relationship Model, European Journal of Information Systems (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hitchman, S.: The Entity Relationship Model And Practical Data Modelling, Journal of Conceptual Modelling 31 (March 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jakoby, J., Speller, D., Kohn, C.: Brand Choice As A Function Of Information Load, Journal Of Applied Psychology 63 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chang, S.K., Sweller, J.: The Expertise Reversal Effect. Educational Psychologist 38(1), 23–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, J., Hahn, J., Hahn, H.: How Do We Understand a System with (So) Many Diagrams? Cognitive Integration Processes in Diagrammatic Reasoning. Information Systems Research 11(3), 284–303 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, Y.-G., March, S.T.:Comparing Data Modelling Formalisms, Communications of the ACM 38(6) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kirschner, P.A.: Cognitive Load Theory: Implications of Cognitive Load Theory on the Design of Learning. Learning and Instruction 12(1), 1–10 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11(1) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lauesen, S., Vinter, O.: Preventing Requirement Defects. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2000), Stockholm, Sweden, June 5-6 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality In Conceptual Modelling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lipowski, Z.J.: Sensory And Information Inputs Overload: Behavioural Effects. Comprehensive Psychiatry 16(3), 105–124 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maier, R.: Benefits And Quality Of Data Modelling: Results Of An Empirical Analysis. In: Thalheim, B. (ed.) Proceedings Of The Fifteenth International Conference On The Entity Relationship Approach, October 7-9, Elsevier, Cottbus (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Martin, J.: Information Engineering, Englewood Cliffs, vol. 3. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miller, G.A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus Or Minus Two: Some Limits On Our Capacity For Processing Information. The Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moody, D.L.: Dealing with Complexity: A Practical Method for Representing Large Entity Relationship Models (PhD Thesis), Melbourne, Australia: Department Of Information Systems, University of Melbourne (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: Improving the Quality of Data Models: Empirical Validation of a Quality Management Framework. Information Systems 28(6), 619–650 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Mousavi, S., Low, R., Sweller, J.: Reducing Cognitive Load by Mixing Auditory and Visual Presentation Modes. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 272–284 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Murdock, B.B.: TODAM3: A Model Of Storage And Retrieval Of Item, Associative And Serial Order Information. Psychological Review 100(2), 183–203 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Newell, A.A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nordbotten, J.C., Crosby, M.E.: The Effect of Graphic Style on Data Model Interpretation. Information Systems Journal 9 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paas, F.: Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem Solving Skill in Statistics: A Cognitive Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology 84, 429–434 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist 38(1), 1–4 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Piattini, M., Genero, M., Calero, C.: Data Model Metrics. In: Chang, S.K. (ed.) Handbook of Software and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 2, World Scientific, New Jersey (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shanks, G.G.: The Challenges Of Strategic Data Plannin. In: Practice: An Interpretive Case Study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 6 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Simsion, G.C.: A Structured Approach To Data Modelling. The Australian Computer Journal 21(3), 108–117 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Simsion, G.C., Witt, G.C.: Data Modeling Essentials: Analysis, Design, and Innovation, 2nd edn. The Coriolis Group (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Standish Group (1995): The CHAOS Report into Project Failure, The Standish Group International Inc. Available on-line at http://www.standishgroup.com/visitor/chaos.htm

  48. STANDISH GROUP (1996): Unfinished Voyages, The Standish Group International Inc., available on-line at http://www.standishgroup.com/visitor/voyages.htm

  49. Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science 12, 257–285 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty and Instructional Design. Learning and Cognition 4 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sweller, J., Chandler, P.: Why Some Material is Difficult to Learn, Cognition and Instruction 12 (3) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Paas, F.: Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3), 251–296 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Teorey, T.J.: Database Modelling And Design, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Teory, T.J., Wei, G., Bolton, D.L., Koenig, J.A.: ER Model Clustering As An Aid For User Communication And Documentatio. In: Database Design. Communications Of The ACM (August 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thalheim, B.: Entity Relationship Modeling: Foundations of Database Technology, p. xii, 627. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Uhr, L., Vossier, C., Weman, J.: Pattern Recognition over Distortions by Human Subjects and a Computer Model of Human Form Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning 63 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Van Merriënboer, J.J.G.: Training Complex Skills: A Four Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vessey, I., Conger, S.: Requirements Specification: Learning Object, Process and Data Methodologies. Communications of the ACM 37, 102–113 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wand, Y., Weber, R.A.: On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars. Journal of Information Systems 3(4), 7–237 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Weber, R.A.: Ontological Foundations Of Information Systems, Melbourne, Australia: Coopers And Lybrand Accounting Research Methodology Monograph No. 4, Coopers And Lybrand (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Woods, D.: Towards a Theoretical Base for Representation Design in the Computer Medium: Ecological Perception and Aiding Human Cognition. In: Flach, J., et al. (eds.) Global Perspectives on the Ecology of Human-Machine Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Woods, D.D., Watts, J.C.: How Not to Have to Navigate Through Too Many Displays. In: Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P.V. (eds.) Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 617–650. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moody, D.L. (2004). Cognitive Load Effects on End User Understanding of Conceptual Models: An Experimental Analysis. In: Benczúr, A., Demetrovics, J., Gottlob, G. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3255. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30204-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30204-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23243-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30204-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics