Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3258))

Abstract

This paper presents a model and implementation techniques for speeding up constraint propagation. Two fundamental approaches to improving constraint propagation are explored: keeping track of which propagators are at fixpoint, and choosing which propagator to apply next. We show how idempotence reasoning and events help track fixpoints more accurately. We improve these methods by using them dynamically (taking into account current domains to improve accuracy). We define priority-based approaches to choosing a next propagator and show that dynamic priorities can improve propagation. We illustrate that the use of multiple propagators for the same constraint can be advantageous with priorities, and introduce staged propagators which combine the effects of multiple propagators with priorities for greater efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apt, K.: Principles of Constraint Programming. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baptiste, P., Le Pape, C., Nuijten, W.: Constraint-based Scheduling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beldiceanu, N., Harvey, W., Henz, M., Laburthe, F., Monfroy, E., Müller, T., Perron, L., Schulte, C.: TRICS 2000. Technical Report TRA9/00, School of Computing, National University of Singapore (Sept. 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlsson, M., Ottosson, G., Carlson, B.: An open-ended finite domain constraint solver. In: Hartel, P.H., Kuchen, H. (eds.) PLILP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1292, pp. 191–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Codognet, P., Diaz, D.: Compiling constraints in clp(FD). The Journal of Logic Programming 27(3), 185–226 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Granvilliers, L., Monfroy, E.: Implementing constraint propagation by composition of reductions. In: Palamidessi, C. (ed.) ICLP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2916, pp. 300–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvey, W.: Personal communication (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harvey, W., Stuckey, P.J.: Constraint representation for propagation. In: Maher, M.J., Puget, J.-F. (eds.) CP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1520, pp. 235–249. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. ILOG S.A. ILOG Solver 5.0: Reference Manual. Gentilly, France (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Intelligent Systems Laboratory. SICStus Prolog user’s manual, 3.11.1. Technical report, Swedish Institute of Computer Science (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laburthe, F.: CHOCO: implementing a CP kernel. In: Beldiceanu et al. [3], pp. 71–85

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lhomme, O., Gotlieb, A., Rueher, M.: Dynamic optimization of interval narrowing algorithms. The Journal of Logic Programming 37(1-3), 165–183 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Müller, T.: The Mozart constraint extensions reference (1999), Available from www.mozart-oz.org

  14. Puget, J.-F.: A fast algorithm for the bound consistency of alldiff constraints. In: Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1998), Madison, WI, USA, July 1998, pp. 359–366. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Régin, J.-C.: A filtering algorithm for constraints of difference in CSPs. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, USA, vol. 1, pp. 362–367. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Savéant, P.: Constraint reduction at the type level. In: Beldiceanu et al. [3], pp. 16–29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Hentenryck, P., Saraswat, V., Deville, Y.: Design, implementation and evaluation of the constraint language cc(FD). Journal of Logic Programming 37(1-3), 139–164 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Hentenryck, P., Simonis, H., Dincbas, M.: Constraint satisfaction using constraint logic programming. Artificial Intelligence 58, 113–159 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace, M., Novello, S., Schimpf, J.: Eclipse: A platform for constraint logic programming. Technical report, IC-Parc, Imperial College, London, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wallace, R.J., Freuder, E.C.: Ordering heuristics for arc consistency algorithms. In: Ninth Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 163–169 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schulte, C., Stuckey, P.J. (2004). Speeding Up Constraint Propagation. In: Wallace, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2004. CP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3258. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23241-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30201-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics