Skip to main content

Looking at the Last Two Turns, I’d Say This Dialogue Is Doomed – Measuring Dialogue Success

  • Conference paper
Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3206))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Two sets of linguistic features are developed: The first one to estimate if a single step in a dialogue between a human being and a machine is successful or not. The second set to classify dialogues as a whole. The features are based on Part-of-Speech-Labels (POS), word statistics and properties of turns and dialogues. Experiments were carried out on the SympaFly corpus, data from a real application in the flight booking domain. A single dialogue step could be classified with an accuracy of 83% (class-wise averaged recognition rate). The recognition rate for whole dialogues was 85%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batliner, A., Hacker, C., Steidl, S., Nöth, E., Haas, J.: User States, User Strategies, and System Performance: How to Match the One with the Other. In: Proc. of ISCA-EHSD 2003, an ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems, Château d’Oex, pp. 5–10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirschberg, J., Litman, D., Swerts, M.: Prosodic Cues to Recognition Errors. In: Proc. of ASRU 1999, Keystone, pp. 349–352 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levow, G.-A.: Characterizing and Recognizing Spoken Corrections in Human-Computer Dialogue. In: Proc. of COLING/ACL 1998, Montréal, vol. 1, pp. 736–742 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruff, C.: Bestimmung des Dialog(schritt)erfolgs mit linguistischen Merkmalen. Studienarbeit, Lehrstuhl für Mustererkennung, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stemmer, G., Steidl, S., Nöth, E., Niemann, H., Batliner, A.: Comparison and Combination of Confidence Measures. In: Sojka, P., et al. (eds.) TSD 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2448, pp. 181–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker, M.A., Langkilde, I., Wright, J., Gorin, A., Litman, D.: Learning to Predict Problematic Situations in a Spoken Dialogue System: Experiments with How I Help You? In: Proc. of NAACL 2000, Seattle, pp. 210–217 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Steidl, S., Hacker, C., Ruff, C., Batliner, A., Nöth, E., Haas, J. (2004). Looking at the Last Two Turns, I’d Say This Dialogue Is Doomed – Measuring Dialogue Success. In: Sojka, P., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech and Dialogue. TSD 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30120-2_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30120-2_79

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23049-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30120-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics