Skip to main content

The Related-Key Rectangle Attack – Application to SHACAL-1

  • Conference paper
Information Security and Privacy (ACISP 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3108))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The rectangle attack and the related-key attack on block ciphers are well-known to be very powerful. In this paper we combine the rectangle attack with the related-key attack. Using this combined attack we can attack the SHACAL-1 cipher with 512-bit keys up to 59 out of its 80 rounds. Our 59-round attack requires a data complexity of 2149.72 chosen plaintexts and a time complexity of 2498.30 encryptions, which is faster than exhaustive search.

This work was supported by MOST research fund (M1-0326-08-0001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biham, E., Shamir, A.: Differential Cryptanalysis of DES-like Cryptosystems. In: Menezes, A., Vanstone, S.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 1990. LNCS, vol. 537, pp. 2–21. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biham, E.: New Types of Cryptanalytic Attacks Using Related Keys. Journal of Crytology 7(4), 229–246 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Biham, E., Biryukov, A., Shamir, A.: Cryptanalysis of skipjack reduced to 31 rounds using impossible differentials. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 12–23. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biham, E., Dunkelman, O., Keller, N.: The Rectangle Attack - Rectangling the Serpent. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 340–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Biham, E., Dunkelman, O., Keller, N.: Rectangle Attacks on 49-Round SHACAL- 1. In: Johansson, T. (ed.) FSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2887, pp. 22–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Blunden, M., Escott, A.: Related Key Attacks on Reduced Round KASUMI. In: Matsui, M. (ed.) FSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2355, pp. 277–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Handschuh, H., Naccache, D.: SHACAL. In: Preproceedings of NESSIE first workshop, Leuven (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong, S., Kim, J., Kim, G., Sung, J., Lee, C., Lee, S.: Impossible Differential Attack on 30-Round SHACAL-2. In: Johansson, T., Maitra, S. (eds.) INDOCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2904, pp. 97–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakimoski, G., Desmedt, Y.: Related-Key Differential Cryptanalysis of 192-bit Key AES Variants. In: Matsui, M., Zuccherato, R.J. (eds.) SAC 2003. LNCS, vol. 3006, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelsey, J., Schneier, B., Wagner, D.: Key Schedule Cryptanalysis of IDEA, GDES, GOST, SAFER, and Triple-DES. In: Koblitz, N. (ed.) CRYPTO 1996. LNCS, vol. 1109, pp. 237–251. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelsey, J., Schneir, B., Wagner, D.: Related-Key Cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham- DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA. In: Han, Y., Quing, S. (eds.) ICICS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1334, pp. 233–246. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelsey, J., Kohno, T., Schneier, B.: Amplified Boomerang Attacks Against Reduced-Round MARS and Serpent. In: Schneier, B. (ed.) FSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1978, pp. 75–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J., Moon, D., Lee, W., Hong, S., Lee, S., Jung, S.: Amplified Boomerang Attack against Reduced-Round SHACAL. In: Zheng, Y. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2501, pp. 243–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Knudsen, L.R.: Trucated and Higher Order Differentials. In: Gollmann, D. (ed.) FSE 1996. LNCS, vol. 1039, pp. 196–211. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ko, Y., Hong, S., Lee, W., Lee, S., Kang, J.: Related Key Differential Attacks on 26 Rounds of XTEA and Full Rounds of GOST. In: Roy, B., Meier, W. (eds.) FSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3017, pp. 299–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, D.: The Boomerang Attack. In: Knudsen, L.R. (ed.) FSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1636, pp. 156–170. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, J., Kim, G., Hong, S., Lee, S., Hong, D. (2004). The Related-Key Rectangle Attack – Application to SHACAL-1. In: Wang, H., Pieprzyk, J., Varadharajan, V. (eds) Information Security and Privacy. ACISP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27800-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27800-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22379-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27800-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics