Skip to main content

Semantic Optimization of Preference Queries

  • Conference paper
Constraint Databases (CDB 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3074))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Preference queries are relational algebra or SQL queries that contain occurrences of the winnow operator (find the most preferred tuples in a given relation). We present here a number of semantic optimization techniques applicable to preference queries. The techniques make it possible to remove redundant occurrences of the winnow operator and to apply a more efficient algorithm for the computation of winnow. We also study the propagation of integrity constraints in the result of the winnow. We have identified necessary and sufficient conditions for the applicability of our techniques, and formulated those conditions as constraint satisfiability problems.

Research supported by NSF Grant IIS-0307434.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Wimmers, E.L.: A Framework for Expressing and Combining Preferences. In: ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 297–306 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baudinet, M., Chomicki, J., Wolper, P.: Constraint-Generating Dependencies. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 59, 94–115 (1999) (Preliminary version in ICDT 1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Börzsönyi, S., Kossmann, D., Stocker, K.: The Skyline Operator. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 421–430 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chomicki, J., Godfrey, P., Gryz, J., Liang, D.: Skyline with Presorting. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE (2003); Poster

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, Q., Gryz, J., Koo, F., Leung, C., Liu, L., Qian, X., Schiefer, B.: Implementation of Two Semantic Query Optimization Techniques in DB2 Universal Database. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chakravarthy, U.S., Grant, J., Minker, J.: Logic-Based Approach to Semantic Query Optimization. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 15(2), 162–207 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chomicki, J.: Querying with Intrinsic Preferences. In: Jensen, C.S., Jeffery, K., Pokorný, J., Šaltenis, S., Bertino, E., Böhm, K., Jarke, M. (eds.) EDBT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2287, pp. 34–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Chomicki, J.: Preference Formulas in Relational Queries. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 28(4), 427–466 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishburn, P.C.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fishburn, P.C.: Preference Structures and their Numerical Representations. Theoretical Computer Science 217, 359–383 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Govindarajan, K., Jayaraman, B., Mantha, S.: Preference Queries in Deductive Databases. New Generation Computing, 57–86 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, S., Sun, W., Weiss, M.A.: Solving Satisfiability and Implication Problems in Database Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 21(2), 270–293 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hristidis, V., Koudas, N., Papakonstantinou, Y.: PREFER: A System for the Efficient Execution of Multiparametric Ranked Queries. In: ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 259–270 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kießling, W., Güntzer, U.: Database Reasoning – A Deductive Framework for Solving Large and Complex Problems by means of Subsumption. In: Luck, K.v., Marburger, H. (eds.) IS/KI 1994 and KI-WS 1994. LNCS, vol. 777, pp. 118–138. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kießling, W., Hafenrichter, B.: Optimizing Preference Queries for Personalized Web Services. In: IASTED International Conference on Communications, Internet and Information Technology (November 2002); Also Tech. Rep. 2002-12, July 2002, Institute of Computer Science, University of Augsburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kießling, W., Hafenrichter, B.: Algebraic Optimization of Relational Preference Queries. Technical Report 2003-1, Institut für Informatik, Universität Augsburg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kießling, W.: Foundations of Preferences in Database Systems. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kießling, W., Köstler, G.: Preference SQL - Design, Implementation, Experience. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Köstler, G., Kießling, W., Thöne, H., Güntzer, U.: Fixpoint Iteration with Subsumption in Deductive Databases. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 4, 123–148 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuper, G., Libkin, L., Paredaens, J. (eds.): Constraint Databases. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Klug, A.: Calculating Constraints on Relational Tableaux. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 5, 260–290 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Klug, A., Price, R.: Determining View Dependencies Using Tableaux. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 7 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kossmann, D., Ramsak, F., Rost, S.: Shooting Stars in the Sky: An Online Algorithm for Skyline Queries. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lacroix, M., Lavency, P.: Preferences: Putting More Knowledge Into Queries. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), pp. 217–225 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maher, M., Wang, J.: Optimizing Queries in Extended Relational Databases. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds.) DEXA 2000. LNCS, vol. 1873, pp. 386–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Papadias, D., Tao, Y., Fu, G., Seeger, B.: An Optimal and Progressive Algorithm for Skyline Queries. In: ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 467–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simmen, D.E., Shekita, E.J., Malkemus, T.: Fundamental Techniques for Order Optimization. In: ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 57–67 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Torlone, R., Ciaccia, P.: Which Are My Preferred Items? In: Workshop on Recommendation and Personalization in E-Commerce (May 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, X., Ozsoyoglu, Z.M.: Implication and Referential Constraints: A New Formal Reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 9(6), 894–910 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chomicki, J. (2004). Semantic Optimization of Preference Queries. In: Kuijpers, B., Revesz, P. (eds) Constraint Databases. CDB 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3074. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25954-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25954-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22126-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25954-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics