Skip to main content

A Constructive Proof of Higman’s Lemma in Isabelle

  • Conference paper
Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3085))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Higman’s lemma, a specific instance of Kruskal’s theorem, is an interesting result from the area of combinatorics, which has often been used as a test case for theorem provers. We present a constructive proof of Higman’s lemma in the theorem prover Isabelle, based on a paper proof by Coquand and Fridlender. Making use of Isabelle’s newly-introduced infrastructure for program extraction, we show how a program can automatically be extracted from this proof, and analyze its computational behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barras, B., et al.: The Coq proof assistant reference manual – version 7.2. Technical Report 0255, INRIA (February 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benl, H., Berger, U., Schwichtenberg, H., Seisenberger, M., Zuber, W.: Proof theory at work: Program development in the Minlog system. In: Bibel, W., Schmitt, P. (eds.) Automated Deduction – A Basis for Applications. Systems and Implementation Techniques of Applied Logic Series, vol. II, pp. 41–71. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berghofer, S.: Program Extraction in simply-typed Higher Order Logic. In: Geuvers, H., Wiedijk, F. (eds.) TYPES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2646, pp. 21–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Constable, R.L., et al.: Implementing Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coquand, T., Fridlender, D.: A proof of Higman’s lemma by structural induction. Unpublished draft (November 1993), available at http://www.math.chalmers.se/~frito/Papers/open.ps.gz

  7. Fridlender, D.: Higman’s lemma in type theory. In: Giménez, E. (ed.) TYPES 1996. LNCS, vol. 1512, pp. 112–133. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Higman, G.: Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras. In: Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 3(2), pp. 326–336 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magnusson, L.: The Implementation of ALF—a Proof Editor Based on Martin- Löf ’s Monomorphic Type Theory with Explicit Substitution. Phd thesis, Dept. of Computing Science, Chalmers Univ. of Technology and Univ. of Göteborg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murthy, C.: Extracting Constructive Content from Classical Proofs. PhD thesis, Cornell University (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Murthy, C.R., Russell, J.R.: A constructive proof of Higman’s lemma. In: Mitchell, J.C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Philadelphia, PA, June 1990, pp. 257–269. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nash-Williams, C.: On well-quasi-ordering finite trees. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 59(4), 833–835 (1963)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Paulin-Mohring, C.: Inductive Definitions in the System Coq - Rules and Properties. In: Bezem, M., Groote, J.F. (eds.) TLCA 1993. LNCS, vol. 664, pp. 49–92. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Seisenberger, M.: Konstruktive Aspekte von Higmans Lemma. Master’s thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seisenberger, M.: On the Constructive Content of Proofs. PhD thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wenzel, M.: Isabelle/Isar – a versatile environment for human-readable formal proof documents. PhD thesis, Institut für Informatik, TU München (2002), http://tumb1.biblio.tu-muenchen.de/publ/diss/in/2002/wenzel.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berghofer, S. (2004). A Constructive Proof of Higman’s Lemma in Isabelle. In: Berardi, S., Coppo, M., Damiani, F. (eds) Types for Proofs and Programs. TYPES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3085. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24849-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24849-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22164-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24849-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics