Abstract
Early studies of indirect loss framed the problem narrowly and focused on secondary ripple effects triggered by supply bottlenecks, i. e., the shortages that cause undamaged producers and service providers to shut down (Cochrane, 1974). Since then, the concept has been refined and the analytical tools for estimating such losses have advanced markedly (RMS, 1996; Rose et al., 1995). Yet despite such advancements, indirect loss remains a somewhat amorphous concept. In contrast to what was once believed, it does not readily yield simple rules of thumb, e. g., “indirect loss is equivalent in magnitude to direct loss.” In fact, it has since been learned that indirect loss can vary dramatically, and under some circumstances may even prove to be negative implying regional net gains (negative losses). This Chapter provides: a conceptual framework for analyzing indirect loss, a brief description of an algorithm for calculating such loss, a discussion of the range of post disaster outcomes that might be expected, and a brief review of the evidence. These elements are then used to evaluate claims various agencies have made regarding the economic fallout from the World Trade Center attack.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boisvert, R. 1992. “Indirect Losses from a Catastrophic Earthquake and Local, Regional, and National Interest,” in Indirect Economic Consequences of a Catastrophic Earthquake. Washington, DC; National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, FEMA.
Bram, J., A Haughwout, and J. Orr. 2002. “Has September 11 Affected New York City’s Growth Potential?” FRBNY Economic Policy Review, November.
Bram, J., J. Orr, and C. Rappaport. 2002. “Measuring the Effects of the September 11 Attack on New York City,” FRBNY Economic Policy Review, November.
Brookshire, D. and M. McKee. 1992. “Indirect Loss Measurement and Computable Equilibrium Models,” in Indirect Economic Consequences of a Catastrophic Earthquake. Washington, DC; National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, FEMA.
Chang, S.E. 1996. “Regional Economic Impact of the January 17, 1995 Kobe, Japan Earthquake,” paper presented at the 43rd North American RSAI Meetings, Washington, DC, November 14–17, 1996.
Chang, S.E. 1999. “The Red River Flood of 1997: An Assessment of Damage and Long Term Economic Recovery,” EQE International.
Cochrane, H. 1974. “Predicting the Economic Impact of Earthquakes,” in H.C. Cochrane et al. eds. Social Science Perspectives on the Coming San Francisco Earthquake. National Hazards Research Paper, No. 25, NHRAIC, Boulder, CO; U. of Colorado.
Cochrane, H. 1996. “Is Northridge A Model for Future Events? What are the Economic Consequences With and Without Insurance and Federal Assistance?” Paper presented at EERI/FEMA Conference Analyzing Economic Impacts and Recovery, Pasadena, CA.
Cochrane, H. 1997. “Indirect Economic Losses,” in Development of Standardized Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology Vol. II. Menlo Park, CA; Risk Management Solutions, Inc.
Cochrane, H., M.P. Laub, and J.R. Barth. 1992. “The Effect of Earthquakes on Banking and Financial Markets, and Computable Equilibrium Models,” in Indirect Economic Consequences of a Catastrophic Earthquake. Washington, DC; National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, FEMA
Congressional Budget Office. 1994. “The Economic Impact of a Solvency Crisis in the Insurance Industry,” April, Washington, DC.
Cummins, J.D. and P.M. Danzon. 1991. “Price Shocks and Capital Flows in Liability Insurance,” in J.D. Cummins, S.E. Harrington, and R.W. Klein eds. Cycles and Crises in Property/Casualty Insurance: Causes and Implications for Public Policy. Kansas City, MO; National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Doherty, N., A. Kleffner, and L. Posey. 1992. Insurance Surplus: Its function, Its Accumulation, and Its Depletion. Boston, MA; The Earthquake Project.
Eisenbeis, R.A. 1995. “Systemic Risk: Bank Deposits and Credit,” in George Kaufman ed. Research in Financial Services Private and Public Policy, Banking, Financial Markets and Systemic Risk, Vol. 7. Greenwich; JAI Press, 55–86.
Government Accounting Office. 2002. “Review of the Studies of the Economic Impact of the September 11, 2001Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center.”
Gron, A. 1989. “Capacity Constraints and Cycles in Property-Casualty Insurance Markets,” working paper, University of Chicago.
Guimaraes, P., F.L. Helfner, and D.P. Woodward. 1993. “Wealth and Income Effects of Natural Disasters: An Economic Analysis of Hurricane Hugo,” Review of Regional Studies, 23 (2): 97–114.
Kaufman, G. 1995. “Comment on Systemic Risk,” in G. Kaufman ed. Research in Financial Services Private and Public Policy, Banking, Financial Markets and Systemic Risk, Vol. 7. Greenwich; JAI Press.
Lamb, R P. and W.F. Kennedy. 1996. “Insurer Stock Prices and Market Efficiency Around the Los Angeles Earthquake,” submitted to the Journal of Insurance Issues, June 1996.
Lamb, R. 1995. “An Exposure-Based Analysis of Property-Liability Insurer Stock Values Around Hurricane Andrew,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62 (1): 111–123.
RMS Inc. 1996. “Development of a Standardized Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology,” draft technical manual prepared for the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC.
Rose, A., J. Benavides, S.E. Chang, P. Szczesniak, and D. Lim. 1995. “The Regional Economic Impact of an Earthquake: Direct and Indirect Effects of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions,” paper presented at the 42nd North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association Meeting International, Cincinnati, November 10, 1995.
Schwartz, A.J. 1995. “Systemic Risk and the Macroeconomy,” in G. Kaufman ed. Research in Financial Services Private and Public Policy, Banking, Financial Markets and Systemic Risk, Vol. 7, Greenwich; JAI Press, 10–30.
West, C.T. and D.G. Lenze. 1994. “Modeling the Regional Economic Impact of Natural Disaster and Recovery: A General Framework and Applications to Hurricane Andrew,” International Regional Science Review, 17: 121–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cochrane, H.C. (2004). Indirect Losses from Natural Disasters: Measurement and Myth. In: Okuyama, Y., Chang, S.E. (eds) Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24787-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24787-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05985-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24787-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive