Skip to main content

On the (Im)possibility of Non-interactive Correlation Distillation

  • Conference paper
LATIN 2004: Theoretical Informatics (LATIN 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2976))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the problem of non-interactive correlation distillation (NICD). Suppose Alice and Bob each has a string, denoted by A = a 0 a 1...a n − 1 and B = b 0 b 1...b n − 1, respectively. Furthermore, for every k=0,1,...,n-1, (a k ,b k ) is independently drawn from a distribution \(\mathcal{N}\), known as the “noise mode”. Alice and Bob wish to “distill” the correlation non-interactively, i.e., they wish to each apply a function to their strings, and output one bit, denoted by X and Y, such that Prob[X = Y] can be made as close to 1 as possible. The problem is, for what noise model can they succeed? This problem is related to various topics in computer science, including information reconciliation and random beacons. In fact, if NICD is indeed possible for some general class of noise models, then some of these topics would, in some sense, become straightforward corollaries.

We prove two negative results on NICD for various noise models. We prove that for these models, it is impossible to distill the correlation to be arbitrarily close to 1. We also give an example where Alice and Bob can increase their correlation with one bit of communication. This example, which may be of its own interest, demonstrates that even the smallest amount of communication is provably more powerful than no communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon, N., Maurer, U., Wigderson, A.: Private communication

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, Y., Rabin, M.O.: Information theoretically secure communication in the limited storage space model. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 65–79. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blahut, R.E.: Theory and practice of error control codes. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, C.H., Bessette, F., Brassard, G., Salvail, L., Smolin, J.: Experimental quantum cryptography. Journal of Cryptology 5(1), 3–28 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett, C.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Linsker, R.: Digital recording system with time-bracketed authentication by on-line challenges and method for authenticating recordings. US patent 5764769 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brassard, G., Salvail, L.: Secret-key reconciliation by public discussion. In: Helleseth, T. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1993. LNCS, vol. 765, pp. 410–423. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cachin, C., Maurer, U.: Linking information reconciliation and privacy amplification. Journal of Cryptology 10(2), 97–110 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cachin, C., Maurer, U.: Unconditional security against memory-bounded adversaries. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 292–306. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of information theory. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding, Y.Z.: Oblivious transfer in the bounded storage model. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 155–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lancaster, P., Tismenetsky, M.: The theory of matrices, with applications, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maurer, U.M.: Conditionally-perfect secrecy and a provably secure randomized cipher. Journal of Cryptology 5, 53–66 (1992)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Maurer, U.M.: Secret key agreement by public discussion from common information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 39, 733–742 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mossel, E., O’Donnell, R.: Coin Flipping from a Cosmic Source: On Error Correction of Truly Random Bits (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rabin, M.: Transaction Protection by Beacons. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 27(2), 256–267 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, K.: On the (Im)possibility of Non-interactive Correlation Distillation (full version). To appear in ECCC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, K. (2004). On the (Im)possibility of Non-interactive Correlation Distillation. In: Farach-Colton, M. (eds) LATIN 2004: Theoretical Informatics. LATIN 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2976. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24698-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24698-5_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21258-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24698-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics