Skip to main content

Watched Data Structures for QBF Solvers

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2919))

Abstract

In the last few years, we have seen a tremendous boost in the efficiency of SAT solvers, this boost being mostly due to Chaff. Chaff owes some of its efficiency to its “two-literal watching” data structure.

In this paper we present watched data structures for Quantified Boolean Formula (QBF) satisfiability solvers. In particular, we propose (i) two Chaff-like literal watching schemes for unit clause detection; and (ii) two other watched data structures, one for detecting pure literals and the other for detecting void quantifiers. We have conducted an experimental evaluation of the proposed data structures, using both randomly generated and real-world benchmarks. Our results indicate that clause watching is very effective, while the 2 and 3 literal watching data structures become more effective as the clause length increases. The quantifier watching structure does not appear to be effective on the instances considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davis, M., Putnam, H.: A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM 7, 201–215 (1960)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem proving. Journal of the ACM 5 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, H., Stickel, M.E.: An efficient algorithm for unit propagation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics (AI-MATH 1996), Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moskewicz, M.W., Madigan, C.F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. In: Proc. DAC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lynce, I., Marques-Silva, J.: Efficient data structures for fast sat solvers. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, SAT 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Tacchella, A.: Backjumping for Quantified Boolean Logic Satisfiability. Artificial Intelligence 145, 99–120 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gent, I., Walsh, T.: Beyond NP: the QSAT phase transition. In: Proc. AAAI, pp. 648–653 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gent, I., Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Rowley, A., Tacchella, A. (2004). Watched Data Structures for QBF Solvers. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing. SAT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2919. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24605-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24605-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24605-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics